Grassroots Narratives and Practices of Diversity in Mostar and Novi Sad

  • Piotr Goldstein
Part of the Global Diversities book series (GLODIV)


Yugoslavia, as its name — “the country of South Slavs” — suggested, was a country whose very existence was based on the ideal of the value of diversity. Different South Slavic peoples and other ethnic groups living among them were to be equal constituents of the country. Despite this narrative, the country collapsed amid the tragic Yugoslav wars of the 1990s, which divided its people along ethnic lines. In the aftermath of the wars, the international community has sought to rebuild trust and dialogue across ethnic communities while supporting post-Yugoslav states’ transition to democracy. While “there is no single document that describes the democratic reconstruction model”, be it in the Western Balkans or elsewhere (Ottaway, 2003, p. 314), it is evident from international donor policies that the international community was “determined to make Bosnia into a multiethnic democratic state” (Ottaway, 2003, p. 320). The same holds true for other ethnically diverse areas of the Western Balkans.


Civil Society Civic Activism Civil Society Actor Intergroup Contact Associational Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Beauregard, R., & Body-Gendrot, S. (1999). The Urban Moment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Belloni, R. (2001). Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieber, F. (2002). Aid dependency in Bosnian politics and civil society: Failures and successes of post-war peacebuilding in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Croatian International Relations Review, 8(26/27), 25–29.Google Scholar
  5. Bieber, F. (2003). The other civil society in Serbia: Non-governmental nationalism — the case of the Serbian resistance movement. In P. Kopecký & C. Mudde (Eds.), Uncivil Society? (pp. 18–34). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bieber, F., & Winterhagen, J. (2006). Ethnic Violence in Vojvodina: Glitch or Harbinger of Conflicts to Come? Flensburg. Retrieved from: [accessed 2 April 2013].Google Scholar
  7. Bilewicz, M. (2007). History as an obstacle: Impact of temporal-based social categorizations on Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 551–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binnie, J., Holloway, J., Millington, S., & Young, C. (2006). Cosmopolitan Urbanism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dawson-Szilagyi, B. (2004). The Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia and Autonomous Region of Vojvodina, and the Need for a More Coherent U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The American Hungarian Association. Retrieved from: Conflict in Vojvodina.pdf [accessed 12 September 2010].Google Scholar
  10. Goldstein, P. (2009). Political Discrimination of the Roma in the European Union. Unpublished MA thesis, International University Institute for European Studies, Gorizia. Retrieved from: [accessed 12 June 2015].Google Scholar
  11. Gunzburger Makaš, E. (2007). Representing Competing Identities. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University. Retrieved from: [accessed 17 August 2013].Google Scholar
  12. Hromadžić, A. (2008). Discourses of integration and practices of reunification at the Mostar Gymnasium, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Comparative Education Review, 52(4), 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hromadžic, A. (2011). Bathroom mixing: Youth negotiate democratization in postconflict Bosnia and Herzegovina. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 34(2), 268–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jansen, S. (2005). Who’s afraid of white socks? Towards a critical understanding of post-Yugoslav urban self-perceptions. Ethnologia Balkanica, 9, 151–167.Google Scholar
  15. Kebo, O. (2003). The Mostar story, or the twenty-first-century Berlin. In G. Glasson Deschaumes & R. Ivekovic (Eds.), Divided Countries, Separated Cities (pp. 106–111). New Delhi; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(7), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ottaway, M. (2003). Promoting democracy after conflict: The difficult choices. International Studies Perspectives, 4(3), 314–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Palmberger, M. (2008). Nostalgia matters: Nostalgia for Yugoslavia as potential vision for a better future. Sociologija, 50(4), 355–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piekut, A., Rees, P., Valentine, G., & Kupiszewski, M. (2012). Multidimensional diversity in two European cities: Thinking beyond ethnicity. Environment and Planning A, 44(12), 2988–3009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putnam, R.D. (1992). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rumiz, P. (2011). Maschere per un massacro. Milano: Feltrinelli Editore.Google Scholar
  22. Solioz, C. (2006). Strengths and weaknesses of civil society in the Balkans: Continuities from conflict to peace. Istanbul. Retrieved from: [accessed 5 April 2012].Google Scholar
  23. Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. van de Port, M. (1998). Gypsies, Wars and Other Instances of the Wild. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vojvođanska Zelena Inicijativa. (n.d.). Sve može…samo trba znati. Retrieved from: [accessed 15 January 2012].

Copyright information

© Piotr Goldstein 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piotr Goldstein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations