Abstract
Yugoslavia, as its name — “the country of South Slavs” — suggested, was a country whose very existence was based on the ideal of the value of diversity. Different South Slavic peoples and other ethnic groups living among them were to be equal constituents of the country. Despite this narrative, the country collapsed amid the tragic Yugoslav wars of the 1990s, which divided its people along ethnic lines. In the aftermath of the wars, the international community has sought to rebuild trust and dialogue across ethnic communities while supporting post-Yugoslav states’ transition to democracy. While “there is no single document that describes the democratic reconstruction model”, be it in the Western Balkans or elsewhere (Ottaway, 2003, p. 314), it is evident from international donor policies that the international community was “determined to make Bosnia into a multiethnic democratic state” (Ottaway, 2003, p. 320). The same holds true for other ethnically diverse areas of the Western Balkans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Beauregard, R., & Body-Gendrot, S. (1999). The Urban Moment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Belloni, R. (2001). Civil society and peacebuilding in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Peace Research, 38(2), 163–180.
Bieber, F. (2002). Aid dependency in Bosnian politics and civil society: Failures and successes of post-war peacebuilding in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Croatian International Relations Review, 8(26/27), 25–29.
Bieber, F. (2003). The other civil society in Serbia: Non-governmental nationalism — the case of the Serbian resistance movement. In P. Kopecký & C. Mudde (Eds.), Uncivil Society? (pp. 18–34). London and New York: Routledge.
Bieber, F., & Winterhagen, J. (2006). Ethnic Violence in Vojvodina: Glitch or Harbinger of Conflicts to Come? Flensburg. Retrieved from: http://www.ecmi.de/uploads/media/working_paper_27.pdf [accessed 2 April 2013].
Bilewicz, M. (2007). History as an obstacle: Impact of temporal-based social categorizations on Polish-Jewish intergroup contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 551–563.
Binnie, J., Holloway, J., Millington, S., & Young, C. (2006). Cosmopolitan Urbanism. London: Routledge.
Dawson-Szilagyi, B. (2004). The Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia and Autonomous Region of Vojvodina, and the Need for a More Coherent U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: The American Hungarian Association. Retrieved from: http://www.americanhungarianfederation.org/docs/The Conflict in Vojvodina.pdf [accessed 12 September 2010].
Goldstein, P. (2009). Political Discrimination of the Roma in the European Union. Unpublished MA thesis, International University Institute for European Studies, Gorizia. Retrieved from: https://www.escholar.manchester.ac.uk/uk-ac-man-scw:121091 [accessed 12 June 2015].
Gunzburger Makaš, E. (2007). Representing Competing Identities. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cornell University. Retrieved from: http://www.academia.edu/2211279/4_Building_Rebuilding_Remembering [accessed 17 August 2013].
Hromadžić, A. (2008). Discourses of integration and practices of reunification at the Mostar Gymnasium, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Comparative Education Review, 52(4), 541–63.
Hromadžic, A. (2011). Bathroom mixing: Youth negotiate democratization in postconflict Bosnia and Herzegovina. PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 34(2), 268–289.
Jansen, S. (2005). Who’s afraid of white socks? Towards a critical understanding of post-Yugoslav urban self-perceptions. Ethnologia Balkanica, 9, 151–167.
Kebo, O. (2003). The Mostar story, or the twenty-first-century Berlin. In G. Glasson Deschaumes & R. Ivekovic (Eds.), Divided Countries, Separated Cities (pp. 106–111). New Delhi; New York: Oxford University Press.
Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(7), 717–741.
Ottaway, M. (2003). Promoting democracy after conflict: The difficult choices. International Studies Perspectives, 4(3), 314–322.
Palmberger, M. (2008). Nostalgia matters: Nostalgia for Yugoslavia as potential vision for a better future. Sociologija, 50(4), 355–70.
Piekut, A., Rees, P., Valentine, G., & Kupiszewski, M. (2012). Multidimensional diversity in two European cities: Thinking beyond ethnicity. Environment and Planning A, 44(12), 2988–3009.
Putnam, R.D. (1992). Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rumiz, P. (2011). Maschere per un massacro. Milano: Feltrinelli Editore.
Solioz, C. (2006). Strengths and weaknesses of civil society in the Balkans: Continuities from conflict to peace. Istanbul. Retrieved from: http://www.ceis-eu.org/events/2006/doc/2006_istanbul.pdf [accessed 5 April 2012].
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–37.
van de Port, M. (1998). Gypsies, Wars and Other Instances of the Wild. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Vojvođanska Zelena Inicijativa. (n.d.). Sve može…samo trba znati. Retrieved from: http://www.vojvodjanskazelenainicijativa.org.rs/reakcije.html [accessed 15 January 2012].
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Piotr Goldstein
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldstein, P. (2015). Grassroots Narratives and Practices of Diversity in Mostar and Novi Sad. In: Matejskova, T., Antonsich, M. (eds) Governing through Diversity. Global Diversities. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-43825-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-43825-6_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43824-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43825-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)