Conclusion: Nation and Diversity — A False Conundrum
Part of the
book series (GLODIV)
In this brief chapter at the end of a collection of essays which have thoroughly investigated multifarious aspects of diversity in a variety of contexts and from a plurality of disciplinary perspectives, we wish to reflect on the place of the nation. Why so? Because it seems to us that one of the most enduring obstacles to thinking of diversity as a constituent component of today’s societies is the way nations remain conceptualized in the mainstream. Nations are often perceived as mono-cultural entities, singular in their cultural essence and often in the people who compose them. According to one of its most renowned analysts, Anthony D. Smith (1991, p. 14), the nation is “a named human population sharing an historic territory, common myths and historical memories, a mass, public culture, a common economy and common legal rights and duties for all members”. The point here is not so much to contest this substantialist understanding of nationhood, as aptly pointed out by Brubaker (1994). Rather, it is to suggest that if one holds such a mono-culturalist understanding of “nation”, it is not surprising that diversity becomes a clear threat. This is apparent when it comes to current public discourses. In fact, increasing efforts to treat diversity as a new governmental paradigm continue to coexist with a general public idea that diversity, particularly when associated with international migration, past or present, is problematic or undesirable (Citrin & Sides, 2008; Simon & Sikich, 2007).
KeywordsSocial Cohesion International Migration National Identity Community Cohesion Public Culture
Amin, A. (2006). The good city. Urban Studies, 43
(5/6), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities.
London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ang, I., & Stratton, J. (1998). Multiculturalism in crisis: The new politics of race and national identity in Australia. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies
, 2(Spring), 22–41.Google Scholar
Antonsich, M. (2012). Exploring the demand of assimilation among white majorities in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38
(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonsich, M. (2014). Living together in diversity. A journey from scholarly views to people’s voices and back. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana
, Serie XIII, vol. VII, pp. 317–337.Google Scholar
Antonsich, M., Fortier, A.-M., Darling, J., Wood, N., & Closs Stephens, A. (2014). Reading Angharad Closs Stephens’s the persistence of nationalism. From imagined communities to urban encounters. Political Geography, 40
, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banting, K.G., & Kymlicka, W. (2012). Is There Really a Backlash against Multiculturalism Policies? Universitat Pompeu Fabra GRITIM Working Paper Series no. 14(Autumn).
Retrieved from: http://www.upf.edu
/gritim/_pdf/14_wp_banting_kymlicka.pdf [accessed 13 January 2014].Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2002). Farewell to multiculturalism? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 3
(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, G. (2004). Introduction. In W. Schiffauer, G. Baumann, R. Kastoryano, & S. Vertovec, Civil Enculturation
(pp. 1–18). Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Biswas, S. (2002). W(h)ither the nation-state? National and state identity in the face of fragmentation and globalisation. Global Society, 16
(2), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, W. (2009). Regulating Aversion.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (1994). Rethinking nationhood. Contention, 4
(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24
(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R. (2006). Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bruno, G. (1877). Le Tour de la France par deux enfants.
Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
Chan, J., Ho-Pong To, T., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75
(2), 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheong, P.H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy, 27
(1), 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, J., & Sides, J. (2008). Immigration and the imagined community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies, 56
(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closs Stephens, A. (2013). The Persistence of Nationalism.
London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Confino, A., & Skaria, A. (2002). The local life of nationhood. National Identities, 4
(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edensor, T. (2002). National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life.
Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke, & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward Assimilation and Citizenship
(pp. 59–86). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (2011). Citizenship in a communitarian perspective. Ethnicities, 11
(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities, 8
(4), 536–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, R. (2007). An excess of alterity? Debating difference in a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30
(6), 979–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, N., & Mason, A. (2010). Introduction: Immigration, diversity and social cohesion. Ethnicities, 10
(4), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home Office (2001). Community Cohesion.
London: Home Office. Retrieved from: http://resources.cohesioninstitute.org.uk
Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state. The British Journal of Sociology, 55
(2), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lægaard, S. (2010). Immigration, social cohesion, and naturalization. Ethnicities, 10
(4), 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, H. (2012). Spaces of encounters. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102
(4), 828–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lödén, H. (2014). Peace, love, depoliticisation and the domestic alien: National identity in the memorial messages collected after the terror attacks in Norway 22 July 2011. National Identities, 16
(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowy Institute (2014). Lowy Institute Poll 2014.
Sydney: Lowy Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.lowyinstitute.org
Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference. Social & Cultural Geography, 12
(7), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, D. (2006). Getting “host” communities on board: Finding the balance between “managed migration” and “managed settlement” in community cohesion strategies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32
(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, D. (2008). The End of Multiculturalism
? Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. (2000). Citizenship and National Identity.
Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Modood, T. (2011). Multiculturalism and Integration.
Fiesole: EUI. Retrieved from: http://www.coe.int
Modood, T., & Meer, N. (2012). Framing contemporary citizenship and diversity in Europe. In A. Triandafyllidou, T. Modood, & N. Meer (Eds.), European Multiculturalisms
(pp. 33–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, A. (2011). Multiculturalism as nation-building in Australia: Inclusive national identity and the embrace of diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34
(12), 2153–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozouf, J., & Ozouf, M. (1997). Le petit livre rouge de la République. In P. Nora (Ed.), Les lieux de mémoire
(vol. 1) (pp. 291–321). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism.
London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rossetto, T. (2015). Performing the nation between us: Urban photographic sets with young migrants. Fennia 193
(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
Schildkraut, D. (2014). Immigrant resentment and American identity in the twenty-first century. In A.A. Barreto, & R.L. O’Bryant (Eds.), American Identity in the Age of Obama
(pp. 100–132). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simon, R.J., & Sikich, K.W. (2007). Public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies across seven nations. International Migration Review, 41
(4), 956–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1991). National Identity.
Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. (1995). Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era.
Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (2001). Nations, national identities and human agency: Putting people back into nations. Sociological Review, 49
(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uberoi, V. (2007). Social unity in Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33
(1), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uberoi, V., & Modood, T. (2013). Has multiculturalism in Britain retreated? Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 53
(1), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference. Progress in Human Geography, 32
(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (Eds.) (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash.
New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Winter, E. (2014). Us, them, and others: Reflections on Canadian multiculturalism and national identity at the turn of the twenty-first century. Canadian Sociological Association/La Société canadienne de sociologie, 51
(2), 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worley, C. (2005). “It’s not about race. It’s about the community”: New Labour and “community cohesion”. Critical Social Policy, 25
(4), 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
© Marco Antonsich and Tatiana Matejskova 2015