Conclusion: Nation and Diversity — A False Conundrum

  • Marco Antonsich
  • Tatiana Matejskova
Part of the Global Diversities book series (GLODIV)


In this brief chapter at the end of a collection of essays which have thoroughly investigated multifarious aspects of diversity in a variety of contexts and from a plurality of disciplinary perspectives, we wish to reflect on the place of the nation. Why so? Because it seems to us that one of the most enduring obstacles to thinking of diversity as a constituent component of today’s societies is the way nations remain conceptualized in the mainstream. Nations are often perceived as mono-cultural entities, singular in their cultural essence and often in the people who compose them. According to one of its most renowned analysts, Anthony D. Smith (1991, p. 14), the nation is “a named human population sharing an historic territory, common myths and historical memories, a mass, public culture, a common economy and common legal rights and duties for all members”. The point here is not so much to contest this substantialist understanding of nationhood, as aptly pointed out by Brubaker (1994). Rather, it is to suggest that if one holds such a mono-culturalist understanding of “nation”, it is not surprising that diversity becomes a clear threat. This is apparent when it comes to current public discourses. In fact, increasing efforts to treat diversity as a new governmental paradigm continue to coexist with a general public idea that diversity, particularly when associated with international migration, past or present, is problematic or undesirable (Citrin & Sides, 2008; Simon & Sikich, 2007).


Social Cohesion International Migration National Identity Community Cohesion Public Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amin, A. (2006). The good city. Urban Studies, 43(5/6), 1009–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Ang, I., & Stratton, J. (1998). Multiculturalism in crisis: The new politics of race and national identity in Australia. TOPIA: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 2(Spring), 22–41.Google Scholar
  4. Antonsich, M. (2012). Exploring the demand of assimilation among white majorities in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(1), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonsich, M. (2014). Living together in diversity. A journey from scholarly views to people’s voices and back. Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, Serie XIII, vol. VII, pp. 317–337.Google Scholar
  6. Antonsich, M., Fortier, A.-M., Darling, J., Wood, N., & Closs Stephens, A. (2014). Reading Angharad Closs Stephens’s the persistence of nationalism. From imagined communities to urban encounters. Political Geography, 40, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banting, K.G., & Kymlicka, W. (2012). Is There Really a Backlash against Multiculturalism Policies? Universitat Pompeu Fabra GRITIM Working Paper Series no. 14(Autumn). Retrieved from: [accessed 13 January 2014].Google Scholar
  8. Bauböck, R. (2002). Farewell to multiculturalism? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 3(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baumann, G. (2004). Introduction. In W. Schiffauer, G. Baumann, R. Kastoryano, & S. Vertovec, Civil Enculturation (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  10. Biswas, S. (2002). W(h)ither the nation-state? National and state identity in the face of fragmentation and globalisation. Global Society, 16(2), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, W. (2009). Regulating Aversion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Brubaker, R. (1994). Rethinking nationhood. Contention, 4(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  13. Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brubaker, R. (2006). Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bruno, G. (1877). Le Tour de la France par deux enfants. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  16. Chan, J., Ho-Pong To, T., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheong, P.H., Edwards, R., Goulbourne, H., & Solomos, J. (2007). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: A critical review. Critical Social Policy, 27(1), 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Citrin, J., & Sides, J. (2008). Immigration and the imagined community in Europe and the United States. Political Studies, 56(1), 33–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Closs Stephens, A. (2013). The Persistence of Nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Confino, A., & Skaria, A. (2002). The local life of nationhood. National Identities, 4(1), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edensor, T. (2002). National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  22. Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke, & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward Assimilation and Citizenship (pp. 59–86). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Etzioni, A. (2011). Citizenship in a communitarian perspective. Ethnicities, 11(3), 336–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fox, J., & Miller-Idriss, C. (2008). Everyday nationhood. Ethnicities, 8(4), 536–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grillo, R. (2007). An excess of alterity? Debating difference in a multicultural society. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 979–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Holtug, N., & Mason, A. (2010). Introduction: Immigration, diversity and social cohesion. Ethnicities, 10(4), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Home Office (2001). Community Cohesion. London: Home Office. Retrieved from: Scholar
  28. Joppke, C. (2004). The retreat of multiculturalism in the liberal state. The British Journal of Sociology, 55(2), 237–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lægaard, S. (2010). Immigration, social cohesion, and naturalization. Ethnicities, 10(4), 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leitner, H. (2012). Spaces of encounters. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(4), 828–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lödén, H. (2014). Peace, love, depoliticisation and the domestic alien: National identity in the memorial messages collected after the terror attacks in Norway 22 July 2011. National Identities, 16(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowy Institute (2014). Lowy Institute Poll 2014. Sydney: Lowy Institute. Retrieved from: Scholar
  33. Matejskova, T., & Leitner, H. (2011). Urban encounters with difference. Social & Cultural Geography, 12(7), 717–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McGhee, D. (2006). Getting “host” communities on board: Finding the balance between “managed migration” and “managed settlement” in community cohesion strategies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32(1), 111–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McGhee, D. (2008). The End of Multiculturalism? Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, D. (1995). On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Miller, D. (2000). Citizenship and National Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  38. Modood, T. (2011). Multiculturalism and Integration. Fiesole: EUI. Retrieved from: Scholar
  39. Modood, T., & Meer, N. (2012). Framing contemporary citizenship and diversity in Europe. In A. Triandafyllidou, T. Modood, & N. Meer (Eds.), European Multiculturalisms (pp. 33–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Moran, A. (2011). Multiculturalism as nation-building in Australia: Inclusive national identity and the embrace of diversity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(12), 2153–2172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ozouf, J., & Ozouf, M. (1997). Le petit livre rouge de la République. In P. Nora (Ed.), Les lieux de mémoire (vol. 1) (pp. 291–321). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  42. Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Rossetto, T. (2015). Performing the nation between us: Urban photographic sets with young migrants. Fennia 193(2), 165–184.Google Scholar
  44. Schildkraut, D. (2014). Immigrant resentment and American identity in the twenty-first century. In A.A. Barreto, & R.L. O’Bryant (Eds.), American Identity in the Age of Obama (pp. 100–132). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Simon, R.J., & Sikich, K.W. (2007). Public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies across seven nations. International Migration Review, 41(4), 956–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith, A.D. (1991). National Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, A.D. (1995). Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, A. (2001). Nations, national identities and human agency: Putting people back into nations. Sociological Review, 49(1), 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Uberoi, V. (2007). Social unity in Britain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(1), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uberoi, V., & Modood, T. (2013). Has multiculturalism in Britain retreated? Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 53(1), 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (Eds.) (2010). The Multiculturalism Backlash. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Winter, E. (2014). Us, them, and others: Reflections on Canadian multiculturalism and national identity at the turn of the twenty-first century. Canadian Sociological Association/La Société canadienne de sociologie, 51(2), 128–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worley, C. (2005). “It’s not about race. It’s about the community”: New Labour and “community cohesion”. Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 483–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marco Antonsich and Tatiana Matejskova 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco Antonsich
  • Tatiana Matejskova

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations