Advertisement

Abstract

This chapter explores the logics of peacebuilding practices in South America, delineating the characteristics of the region in this regard. The research focuses in particular on the case of Colombia and on the region of Montes de María, located on Colombia’s Atlantic coast. The chapter initially discusses the patterns of conflict transformation in the South American region, and subsequently turns to an analysis of how peace has been contested at the local level in Colombia. Significantly, the Colombia case study has been selected because of two overriding factors. First, Colombia remains the only country in South America that is currently experiencing an armed conflict, suggesting that it represents, at best, a regional exception or, at worst, an aberration. While all other armed conflicts have come to a close and all authoritarian regimes have eventually undergone political transitions, Colombia is still experiencing widespread political violence wielded by diverse illegal armed groups. Second, Colombia represents the most pronounced case of local-level peacebuilding initiatives (LPBIs) being proven to have an important, albeit limited, impact upon the causes and consequences of armed conflict, in spite of the presence of conventional liberal peace politics. Consequently, Colombia speaks to, yet differs from, broader processes within the region, where civil society mobilizations were critical not only in shaping transition from authoritarian rule, such as in Chile and Argentina, but also where civil society actors assumed a formal role in peace negotiations, such as the case of Guatemala.

Keywords

Civil Society Social Movement United Nations Development Programme Authoritarian Regime Political Violence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Oliver Ramsbotham, Tom Woodhouse and Hugh Miall, Contemporary Conflict Resolution (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011), chapter XX.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adane Ghebremeskel and Richard Smith, ‘Comments on Paul van Tongeren’s “Potential Cornerstone of Infrastructure for Peace? How Local Peace Committees Can Make a Difference”’, Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliver Richmond, ‘From Peacebuilding as Resistance to Peacebuilding as Liberation’, in Rethinking Peacebuilding: The Quest for Just Peace in the Middle East and the Western Balkans, eds Karin Aggestam and Annika Björkdahl (London: Routledge, 2013), 64–77 (67).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See George Joseph and Greg Grandin, eds, A Century of Revolution: Insurgent and Counterinsurgent Violence during Latin America’s Long Cold War (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010) for a detailed analysis of Latin America’s Cold War.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See Greg Grandin, ‘Living in Revolutionary Time: Coming to Terms with the Violence of Latin America’s Long Cold War’, in A Century of Revolution, G. Joseph and G. Grandin (Durham: Duke University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    See Roger Mac Ginty and Andrew Williams, Conflict and Development, especially chapter five (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Guillermo O’Donnell, Philippe Schmitter and Laurence Whitehead, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    See O’Donnell, Schmitter and Whitehead, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule; See also Terry Karl, ‘What Democracy Is … and Is Not’, Journal of Democracy 2, no. 3 (1991): 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    See, for example, Cynthia Arnson, ed., In the Wake of War: Democratization and Internal Armed Conflict in Latin America (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Stanford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See John Paul Lederach, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies (Washington, DC: USIP, 1997).Google Scholar
  11. See also Graham Gill, Dynamics of Democratization: Elites, Civil Society, and the Transition Processes (London: Palgrave, 2000);Google Scholar
  12. Erica Chenoweth and María Stepan, Why Civil Resistance Works (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    See Dinorah Azpuru, ‘Democracy and Governance in Conflict and Postwar Latin America: A Quantitative Assessment’, in In the Wake of War, ed. Cynthia Arnson (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Stanford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    See Terry Karl, From Democracy to Democratization and Back: Before Transitions from Authoritarian Rule (CDDRL Working Papers, Stanford University, 2005).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    See Roddy Brett, Local Level Peacebuilding in Colombia (Bogota: United Nations, 2014).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    See, for example, Joe Foweraker, Theorizing Social Movements (London: Pluto Press, 1995);Google Scholar
  17. Sonia Alvarez et al., Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures Re-visioning Latin American Social Movements (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Comisión Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación (CNRR), Grupo de Memoria Histórica. La Masacre de El Salado. Esa Guerra no Era Nuestra (Bogotá: Editorial Taurus-Ediciones Semana, 2009), 9.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Paul van Tongeren, ‘Potential Cornerstone of Infrastructures for Peace? How Local Peace Committees Can Make a Difference’, Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 39–60;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Andries Odendaal, An Architecture for Building Peace at the Local Level: A Comparative Study of Local Peace Committees (New York: UNDP-BCPR, 2010).Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    According to Garcia Duran, Colombia could, in fact, be identified as the country with the highest level of peace mobilizations during armed conflict. See M. Garcia Duran, Movimiento por la Paz en Colombia, 1978–2003 (Bogotá: CINEP, 2006).Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    Roger Mac Ginty, ‘Routine Peace: Technocracy and Peacebuilding’, Cooperation and Conflict 47, no. 3 (2012): 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 25.
    Andries Odendaal, ‘Cornerstones or Scattered Bricks?, Comments on Paul van Tongeren’s “Potential Cornerstone of Infrastructures for Peace? How Local Peace Committees Can Make a Difference”’, Peacebuilding 1, no. 1 (2013): 61–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Roddy Brett and Diana Florez 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roddy Brett
  • Diana Florez

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations