Skip to main content

Abstract

East Asia is often seen as a region where international relations is still characterized by severe security competition. The sovereignty dispute over the Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, administrated by Japan but also claimed by China, has been one of the regional flashpoints involving competition for fishery resources and potential oil reserves. In September 2010, a Chinese trawler collided with a Japan Coast Guard patrol boat in waters near the contested islands, and Beijing allegedly delayed the export of rare earth metals to Japan. Tensions continued to build up, especially after the Japanese government bought the Senkakus from their private landlord in September 2012. This move triggered a series of large-scale anti-Japanese demonstrations in major Chinese cities, a slump in Japanese exports to China and in Chinese tourists to Japan, and frequent appearance of Chinese patrol vessels and aircraft in the surrounding waters and airspace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Discussions in this and the following paragraphs are developed from Chengxin Pan, ‘Shu and the Chinese Quest for Harmony: A Confucian Approach to Mediating across Difference’, in Mediating across Difference: Oceanic and Asian Approaches to Conflict Resolution, eds Morgan Brigg and Roland Bleiker (Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press, 2011), 221–247.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Legge, trans., Confucian Analects, The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean (New York: Dover Publications, 1971), 256.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pan, ‘Shu and the Chinese Quest for Harmony’, 224.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. C. Lau, trans., Mencius, book 4, part A: 4 (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970), 119.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pan, ‘Shu and the Chinese Quest for Harmony’, 225.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Compellence refers to a specific type of coercion that threatens to use force to make another actor do (or undo) some action. See Thomas Schelling, Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, Alastair Iain Johnston, Cultural Realism: Strategic Culture and Grand Strategy in Chinese History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995);

    Google Scholar 

  8. and Yuan-kang Wang, Harmony and War: Confucian Culture and Chinese Power Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qifu Guo, ed. Wuwang guochi: zaichuang huihaung [Never Forget National Humiliation: Recreating the Glory] (Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1996), 126.

    Google Scholar 

  10. David C. Kang, East Asia before the West: Five Centuries of Trade and Tribute (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Barry Buzan and Richard Little, International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), 234.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shogo Suzuki, Civilization and Empire: China and Japan’s Encounter with European International Society (London: Routledge, 2009), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Contra Buzan and Little, International Systems in World History, 234.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takeshi Hamashita, Choko sisutemu to kindai Ajia [The Tribute System and Modern Asia] (Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1997); Suzuki, Civilization and Empire, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. R. Howland, Borders of Chinese Civilization: Geography and History at Empire’s End (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996), 13–15.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Ibid., 14.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamashita, Choko sisutemu to kindai Ajia, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. In 1871, a native tribe in southern Taiwan murdered 54 Ryukyuans following their shipwreck there. The survivors were rescued by local Chinese officials and escorted to the Ryukyuan trading mission in Fuzhou in 1872. From the perspective of international law, it was a misstep indeed for China to admit that the Ryukyuans were Japanese citizens; nevertheless, admitting Japan’s effective governance over Ryukyu did not necessarily imply that China henceforth had lost Ryukyu as a vassal as far as their tributary relations were concerned. Suzuki, Civilization and Empire, 158–159.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qing Grand Council (Junjichu), ed. Qing guangxuchao zhongri jiaoshe shiliao [Sino-Japanese Diplomatic History during Emperor Quangxu’s Reign], vol. 1 (Taipei: Wenhai, 1963), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ru-lun Wu, ed. Li Wenzhong gong (Hongzhang) quan ji, yishu hangao [Li Hongzhang Collection, Letters with Translation Bureau], vol. 8 (Taipei: Wenhai, 1980), 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chia-bin Liang, ‘Liuqiu wangguo zhongri zhengchi kaoshi [An Inquiry of the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Extinguishment of the Ryukyu Kingdom]’, in Zhongguo jindai xiandai shilunji [Essays on Modern China], vol. 15, ed. Executive Committee for the Promotion of Chinese Culture Renaissance (Taipei: Taiwan Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1986), 115–117.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li Wenzhong gong (Hongzhang) quanji, yishuhangao, vol. 7, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ed. Nippon gaiko bunsho [Documents on Japanese Foreign Policy], vol. 12 (Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1949), 178–179. Ryukyu had been under the strict control of the Satsuma clan since 1609, but it maintained an ambiguous status as a ‘double tributary state’ to both Japan and China.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yen-wei Wang, Qingji waijiao shiliao [Diplomatic History of the Qing Dynasty], vol. 16 (Taipei: Wenhai, 1963), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuanhua Shi, ed., Jindai Zhongguo zhoubian waijiao shilun [Modern China and Its Neighbours: A Diplomatic History] (Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu Chubanshe, 2006), 272.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liang, ‘Liuqiu wangguo zhongri zhengchi kaoshi’, 143, 145–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Qing guangxuchao zhongri jiaoshe shiliao, vol. 2, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Howland, Borders of Chinese Civilization, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ibid., 233.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See note 16.

    Google Scholar 

  34. The ‘1992 consensus’ refers to a modus operandi under which Taipei neither openly challenges Beijing’s ‘One China Principle’ (there is only one China and Taiwan is a part of it) nor accepts the latter’s definition of China (PRC).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chisheng Chang, ‘Tianxia System on a Snail’s Horns’, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 12, no. 1 (2011): 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. David L. Hall and Roger T. Ames, Thinking through Confucius (New York: State University of New York Press, 1987), 288–289.

    Google Scholar 

  37. This resembles the concept of the ‘Security Dilemma Sensibility’, in Ken Booth and Nicholas J. Wheeler, The Security Dilemma: Fear, Cooperation, and Trust in World Politics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Doctrine of the Mean, chapter 14:5, in Legge, Confucius, 396.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Ching-Chang Chen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, CC. (2016). East Asia: Understanding the Broken Harmony in Confucian Asia. In: Richmond, O.P., Pogodda, S., Ramović, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disciplinary and Regional Approaches to Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-40761-0_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics