Humanitarianism and Peace
Popular images of humanitarian aid workers handing out food in refugee camps and vaccinating children in isolated areas, often in the midst of ongoing political violence, portray a clear synergy between the goals of the humanitarian and the aims of the peacebuilder. While the practices they engage in are often different, there is an overlap in terms of their ethical stance towards violence and their political commitment to engage in activities which will alleviate human suffering. This chapter will reflect on these commonalities, arguing that such an overlap is indeed present but that the shared sense of purpose is also regularly questioned. Through these reflections, the chapter will uncover the ways in which the goals of liberal peace are simultaneously adopted, adapted and challenged by humanitarians.
KeywordsHumanitarian Actor Global Governance Human Security Disciplinary Perspective Humanitarian Assistance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.OCHA (Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs), ‘Peacebuilding and Linkages with Humanitarian Action: Key Emerging Trends and Challenges’, OCHA Policy Development and Studies Branch, OCHA Occasional Policy Briefing Series, no. 7 (2011): 4; see also Elizabeth G. Ferris, The Politics of Protection (Washington: Brookings Institute, 2011).Google Scholar
- 2.Mark Duffield, Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), 111.Google Scholar
- 5.Soren Jessen-Peterson, ‘Humanitarianism in Crisis’, United States Institute for Peace Special Report 273 (Washington: United States Institute for Peace, 2011).Google Scholar
- 6.David Chandler, Empire in Denial: The Politics of State Building (London: Pluto Press, 2006).Google Scholar
- 7.Chandler, Empire in Denial; Mark Duffield, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed, 2001); and Development, Security and Unending War.Google Scholar
- 18.Alexandra Gheciu, ‘Divided Partners: The Challenges of NATO-NGO Cooperation in Peacebuilding Operations’, Global Governance 17, no. 1 (2011): 95–113.Google Scholar
- 20.Mark Duffield, ‘Aid Policy and Post-Modern Conflict: A Critical Review’. Discussion Paper No. 19, 1998 (School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham); M. Glad, A Partnership at Risk? The UN-NGO Relationship in Light of UN Integration: A NRC Discussion Paper (2012); Joanna Macrae, ‘The Death of Humanitarianism?: An Anatomy of the Attack’, Disasters 22, no. 4 (1998): 309–317; Macrae and Leader, ‘Apples, Pears and Porridge’; White and Cliffe, ‘Matching Response to Context in Complex-Political Emergencies’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Sarah Collinson, Samir Elhawary and Robert Muggah, ‘States of Fragility: Stabilisation and Its Implications for Humanitarian Action’, Disasters 34, no. s3 (2010): 280.Google Scholar
- 36.Marie-Pierre Allié, ‘Introduction: Acting at Any Price’, in Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience, eds Claire Magone, Michael Neuman and Fabrice Weissman (London: Hurst & Company, 2011); Glad, 2012; Jessen-Petersen, ‘Humanitarianism in Crisis’; Sommaruga, ‘Humanitarian Action and Peacekeeping Operations’.Google Scholar
- 38.Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities (London: Verso, 1999);Google Scholar
- Naz K. Moderizadeh, Dustin A. Lewis and C. Bruderlein, ‘Humanitarian Engagement under Counter-Terrorism: A Conflict of Norms and Emerging Policy Landscape’, International Review of the Red Cross 93, no. 883 (2011): 623–647; White and Cliffe, ‘Matching Response to Context in Complex-Political Emergencies’.CrossRefGoogle Scholar