Advertisement

Art Crime pp 169-178 | Cite as

Aramaic Incantation Bowls in War and in Peace

  • Neil Brodie

Abstract

The archaeological sites and museums of Iraq have been subject to intermittent and sometimes serious looting since the end of the 1991 Gulf War. Stolen and illegally exported artifacts have been traded and collected on the international market without any indication of provenance (ownership history) that might help to reveal their illicit pedigrees. The act of looting destroys material evidence of the past and the trade is in the hands of criminals. Nevertheless, many of these artifacts that are now in private hands are being published and studied by university-based scholars. This chapter offers a brief overview of the legal and ethical issues that the collection and study of unprovenanced, but likely looted and criminally traded, objects entails, by reference to the example of Aramaic-inscribed incantation bowls.

Keywords

Press Release Archaeological Site Academic Freedom Archaeological Context Cultural Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Neil Brodie, “The market background to the April 2003 plunder of the Iraq National Museum,” in The Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq, ed Peter G. Stone and Joanne Farchakh Bajjaly, 41–54. (London: Boydell Press, 2008), pp. 46, 50–51 table 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shaul Shaked, J.N. Ford, and Siam Bhayro,. Aramaic Bowl Spells: Jewish Babylonian Aramaic Bowls Volume One. (Leiden: Brill 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dan Levene, A Corpus of Magic Bowls: Incantation Texts in Jewish Aramaic from Late Antiquity (London: Kegan Paul, 2003).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Neil Brodie, “Iraq 1990–2004 and the London Antiquities Market,” in Archaeology, Cultural Heritage and the Antiquities Trade, ed Neil Brodie, Morag M. Kersel, Christina Luke and Kathryn Walker Tubb, 206–226 (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 16.
    John Peters, Nippur, or, Explorations and adventures on the Euphrates: The narrative of the University of Pennsylvania Expedition to Babylonia in the years 1888–1890 (New York: G.P. Putnam and Sons, 1897), pp. 182–194.Google Scholar
  6. 19.
    Shaul Shaked, “Transmission and transformation of spells: the case of the Jewish Babylonian Aramaic bowls,” Continuity and Innovation in the Magical Tradition, ed Gideon Bohak, Yuval Harari and Shaul Shaked, 187–218 (Leiden: Brill 2011), at pp. 201–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 21.
    Christa Müller-Kessler, “Of Jesus, Darius, Marduk…: Aramaic magic bowls in the Moussaieff collection” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 125, 219–240, 2005 at p. 221.Google Scholar
  8. 25.
    Isaiah Berlin, Two concepts of liberty. Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1969).Google Scholar
  9. 26.
    Andrew George,. Babylonian Literary Texts in the Schøyen Collection (Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology. Volume 3). (Bethesda: CDL Press 2009), p. xvi.Google Scholar
  10. 27.
    Neil Brodie, “Congenial bedfellows? The academy and the antiquities trade” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27, 411–440, 2011.Google Scholar
  11. 28.
    Angela Brew, The Nature of Research Inquiry in Academic Contexts (London: Routledge 2001), p. 78.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Neil Brodie 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Brodie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations