Aramaic Incantation Bowls in War and in Peace
The archaeological sites and museums of Iraq have been subject to intermittent and sometimes serious looting since the end of the 1991 Gulf War. Stolen and illegally exported artifacts have been traded and collected on the international market without any indication of provenance (ownership history) that might help to reveal their illicit pedigrees. The act of looting destroys material evidence of the past and the trade is in the hands of criminals. Nevertheless, many of these artifacts that are now in private hands are being published and studied by university-based scholars. This chapter offers a brief overview of the legal and ethical issues that the collection and study of unprovenanced, but likely looted and criminally traded, objects entails, by reference to the example of Aramaic-inscribed incantation bowls.
KeywordsPress Release Archaeological Site Academic Freedom Archaeological Context Cultural Object
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Neil Brodie, “The market background to the April 2003 plunder of the Iraq National Museum,” in The Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq, ed Peter G. Stone and Joanne Farchakh Bajjaly, 41–54. (London: Boydell Press, 2008), pp. 46, 50–51 table 2.Google Scholar
- 3.Dan Levene, A Corpus of Magic Bowls: Incantation Texts in Jewish Aramaic from Late Antiquity (London: Kegan Paul, 2003).Google Scholar
- 16.John Peters, Nippur, or, Explorations and adventures on the Euphrates: The narrative of the University of Pennsylvania Expedition to Babylonia in the years 1888–1890 (New York: G.P. Putnam and Sons, 1897), pp. 182–194.Google Scholar
- 21.Christa Müller-Kessler, “Of Jesus, Darius, Marduk…: Aramaic magic bowls in the Moussaieff collection” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 125, 219–240, 2005 at p. 221.Google Scholar
- 25.Isaiah Berlin, Two concepts of liberty. Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1969).Google Scholar
- 26.Andrew George,. Babylonian Literary Texts in the Schøyen Collection (Cornell University Studies in Assyriology and Sumerology. Volume 3). (Bethesda: CDL Press 2009), p. xvi.Google Scholar
- 27.Neil Brodie, “Congenial bedfellows? The academy and the antiquities trade” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27, 411–440, 2011.Google Scholar
- 28.Angela Brew, The Nature of Research Inquiry in Academic Contexts (London: Routledge 2001), p. 78.Google Scholar