Female Domestic Workers on the Move: Examining Global Householding and Global De-Householding in Today’s World

  • Rieko Karatani
Open Access


Blown in by a windstorm from the East, Mary Poppins came to the Banks’ home at Number 17 Cherry Tree Lane, London. The main character of P. L. Travers’ children’s novel, published in 1934, is allegedly the world’s best-known “nanny.”1 The Banks’ household is a traditional one. Mr Banks works in a bank in the City of London, leaving the task of hiring a suitable nanny for their children to Mrs Banks alone. Mrs Banks places a job advertisement in the newspaper, specifying a strong letter of recommendation as a requirement. Thus, a female employer decides the employment conditions of and negotiates with the female employee—a woman directing another woman.2 In the Banks’ home, the nanny is to work in a live-in environment, sleep in a nursery room, and have one day off every other Thursday. Even then, of course, it is not a full day, but only the afternoon between 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. In the eyes of the nanny’s employer, there exists neither labor standard legislation nor any basic rights for laborers or employees.


European Union Host Country Home Country Migrant Worker Immigrant Woman 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ackers, L. (1998). Shifting spaces: women, citizenship and migration within the European Union. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labor. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bhabha, J. & Shutter, S. (1994). Women’s movement: Women under immigration and nationality and refugee law. London: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  4. Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  5. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  6. Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2009). The age of migration: International population movements in the modern world (4th edn). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Chang, G. (2000). Disposable domestics: Immigrant women workers in the global economy. Cambridge: South End Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cholewinski, R. (1997). Migrant workers in international human rights law: Their protection in countries of employment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, J. (Ed.) (2008). The international migration of health workers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Council of Europe (1996). Joint specialist group on migration, cultural diversity and equality between women and men, final report of activities (EG-MG, 2 rev.). Retrieved form http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/equality/03themes/gender-equality/EG-MG(1996)2_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Curran, S., Shafer, S., Donato, K., & Garip, F. (2006). Mapping gender and migration in sociological scholarship: Is it segregation or integration? International Migration Review, 40, 199–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donato, K., Gabaccia, D., Holdaway, J., Manalansan, M., & Pessar, P. (2006). A glass half full? gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Donnelly, J. (1986). International human rights: a regime analysis. International Organisation, 40(3), 599–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Douglass, M. (2006). Global householding in Pacific Asia. International Development Planning Review, 28(4), 421–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehrenreich, B., & Hochschild, A. R. (2002). Global women: nannies, maids, and sex workers in the new economy. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  16. Enloe, C. (2000). Banana, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics (2nd edn). Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gregory, J., Sales, R., & Hegewisch, A. (1999). Women, work and equality: The challenge of equal pay in a deregulated market. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Gregson, N. & Lowe, M. (1994). Servicing the middle classes: Class, gender and waged domestic labour in contemporary Britain. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: Vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guiraudon, V. & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control, Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 163–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, L. (2000). The little mermaid’s silent security dilemma and the absence of gender in the Copenhagen School. Millennium, 29(2), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy-Fanta, C. (1993). Latina politics-Latino politics. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hatsuse, R. (2003). “Nihgen no anzenhosho” ron no houkousei [Directions for the studies of “human security”], Gendaishakai kenkyu [Contemporary Research], 4/5, 81–95.Google Scholar
  24. Home Office. (2005). UK visas diplomatic service procedures entry clearance vol. 1 general instructions (Chapter 14.5).Google Scholar
  25. Hune, S. (1987). Drafting an international convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and their families. International Migration Review, 21, 123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hune, S. (1991). Migrant women in the context of the international convention on the protection of the rights of all migrant workers and members of their families. International Migration Review, 25, 800–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huysmans, J. (1998). Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the creative development of a security studies agenda in Europe. European Journal of International Relations, 4, 479–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Keck, M. E. & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kingma, M. (2006). Nurses on the move: Migration and the global health care economy. London: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Krause, K. & Williams, M. C. (1996). Broadening the agenda of security studies: politics and methods, Mershon International Studies Review, 40, 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parreñas, R. S. (2005). Children of global migration: Transnational families and gendered woes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Pessar, P. R. & Mahler, S. J. (2003). Transnational migration: Bringing gender. International Migration Review, 37, 812–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, V. S. (1996). Shifting ground(s): Epistemological and territorial remapping in the context of globalization(s), In E. Kofman, & G. Young (Eds), Globalization: theory and practice (pp. 11–28). New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, J., Wallerstein, I., & Evers, H. D. (1984). Households and the world-economy. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Steans, J. (2006). Gender and international relations: Issues, debates and future directions (2nd edn). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  37. Tickner, J. A. (1997). You just don’t understand: troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tickner, J. A. (2001). Gendering world politics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Development Program (1994). Human development report 1994: New dimensions of human security. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations General Assembly (2000a). Protocol against the smuggling of migrants by land, sea and air, supplementing the United Nations Convention against transnational crime. Treaty Series. (Vol. 2241, p. 507, Doc. A/55/383). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  41. United National General Assembly (2000b). Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations Convention against transnational organized crime. Treaty Series. (Vol. 2237, p. 319, Doc. A/55/383). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rieko Karatani 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rieko Karatani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations