A Dialogical Conversation: A Response to the Responses
I have found all three responses to my article fascinating and thought-provoking. Of course, these three chapters are much more than mere responses — each in their own way, to a lesser or greater degree, has taken my paper as a point of departure to reflect upon the related ideas of the politics of belonging, intersectionality and transversal politics, as well as to tell the stories of the fascinating women and women’s groups they have been working with. I find that even when seemingly the writers do not agree with what I have written (or sometimes the way they interpret what I’ve written), there is a basic agreement and a shared perspective with them all.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dhaliwal, S. and N. Yuval-Davis (eds) (2014) Women Against Fundamentalism: Stories of Dissent and Solidarity. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
- Fraser, N. and A. Honneth (1998) Redistribution or Recognition? A Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Hill-Collins, P. (1990) Black Feminist Thought, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Ruddick, S. (1989) Maternal Thinking. London: The Women’s Press.Google Scholar
- Tronto, J. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for the Ethics of Care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yuval-Davis, N. (2011a) The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Yuval-Davis, N. (2011b) Beyond the Recognition and Re-distribution Dichotomy: Intersectionality and Stratification, in H. Lutz, M. T. Herrera Viva and L. Spuil (eds) Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies. London: Ashgate, 155–170.Google Scholar