Towards an Ethics of Care: Response to ‘Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging’

  • Aili Mari Tripp

Abstract

Nira Yuval-Davis, in her thought-provoking essay ‘Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging’, advocates for a view of intersectionality that is mutually constitutive and is focused on a politics of belonging, which has to do with contestation between different people sharing the same location. She stresses that one cannot homogenize a political project of people who are positioned differently. She argues that in spite of globalization, state citizenship still remains the most important political project of our time, along with nationalist and religious projects. In this context she wants to develop a feminist political project of belonging based on an ‘ethics of care’, rather than one built on citizenship, nationalism, religion or cosmopolitanism. It is an ethics of care that is based on power and shared values rather than an economy of care that simply makes it easier for women to be exploited. She asks on what basis should that ‘ethics of care’ be built and is uncomfortable with the notion that it be built on the bond of mothers to their children, which is a relationship of love, need and dependence rather than a more symmetrical relationship. What criteria, then, should be used to decide how differences should be respected and how does one determine the ability to respect, she asks?

Keywords

Amid Smoke Nigeria Heroine Metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Assiter, Allison (2009) Kierkegaard, Metaphysics and Political Theory: Unfinished Selves. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. AWPSG (2004) Liberian Women Peacemakers: Fighting for the Right to Be Seen, Heard and Counted. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dukulé, Abdoulaye W. (2005) Ellen Johnson Sirleaf Speaks on Governance, Elections and Other Issues (Interview). The Perspective, 6 May 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Htun, Mala and Juan Pablo Ossa (2013) Political Inclusion of Marginalized Groups: Indigenous Reservations and Gender Parity in Bolivia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, K. (1991) Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lutz, H, M. T. Herrera Vivar and L. Supik (2011) Framing Intersectionality: Debates on a Multifaceted Concept in Gender Studies. London: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  7. King, Martin Luther, Jr. (1967) Where Do We Go from Here?. Atlanta, GA: Annual Report Delivered at the 11th Convention of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.Google Scholar
  8. National Catholic Register (2014) Christians and Muslims United in Nigeria, Says Bishop. 16 May 2014.Google Scholar
  9. New York Times (2014) Car: Woman Chosen to Lead Central African Republic Out of Mayhem. 20 January 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Nussbaum, Martha C. (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nussbaum, Martha C. and Amartya Sen (eds) (1993) The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Subramanian, Mangala (2014) Resisting Gendered Religious Nationalism: The Case of Religious-Based Violence in Gujarat, India. Advances in Gender Research, 18B, 71–96.Google Scholar
  13. The Guardian (2014) Lagos Traders Protest Abduction of School Girls in Borno. 5 May 2014.Google Scholar
  14. Yuval-Davis, Nira (2011) Power, Intersectionality and the Politics of Belonging. Aalborg University: FREIA — Feminist Research Center in Aalborg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Aili Mari Tripp 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aili Mari Tripp

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations