Peace and the Religions in a Changing World: From Consensus to Difference

  • Darren J. Dias
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Postcolonial Studies in Education book series (PCSE)


Lorenzo Milani never faced the issue of interreligious dialogue, perhaps because a recognition of its importance did not gain momentum until shortly before his death or perhaps because his context was more monocultural and monoreligious than the multicultural and multireligious world of today. However, given his interest in building inclusive communities, whether at San Donato or Barbiana, his coherence between reflection, action, and commitment, his advocacy for alternative modes of deploying of power and his privileged option for the poor,1 an article on peace and the world’s religions resonates with his life and ministry.


Religious Tradition Religious Diversity Violent Conflict Peace Process Dialogical Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Borg, C., Cardona, M., and Caruana, S. (2009). “Introduction.” In Letter to a Teacher: Lorenzo Milani’s Contributions to Critical Citizenship (Malta: Agenda), pp.6–7.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dwyer, J. A. (1991). “Peace.” In Joseph A Komonchak, Mary Collins, Dermot A. Lane (eds.), The New Dictionary of Theology (Collegeville: The Liturigcal Press), p.749.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Matthais Mettner (1996). “Paix,” trans. A. Disselkamp, Nouveau Dictionnaire de Théologie, dir. Peter Eicher (Paris: Les Editions du Cerf), p.649.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Johnson, J. T. (2003). “Aquinas and Luther on War and Peace.” Journ al of Religious Ethics 33, 11.Google Scholar
  5. 13.
    See Paul VI (1967). Populorum Progressio, available at:, accessed February 29, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 15.
    Girard, R. (2004). “Violence and Religion: Cause or Effect?.” In The Hedgehog Review 6.1, 8–12.Google Scholar
  7. 16.
    Kimball, C. (2011). When Religion Becomes Evil (Hoboken: Jossey-Bass).Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    Juergensmyer, M. (2004). “Is Religion the Problem?.” In The Hedgehog Review 6.1, 29–30.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Little, D. (2005). “Religion, Conflict and Peace.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 98.Google Scholar
  10. 33.
    Swidler, L. (2009). “Doing Effective Dialogue and Loving It.” In Rebecca Kratz Mays and Leonard Swindler (eds.), Interfaith Dialogue at the Grass Roots (Philadelphia: Ecumenical Press), p.11.Google Scholar
  11. 42.
    Copeland, M. S. (1996). “Difference as a Category in Critical Theologies for the Liberation of Women.” In Elisabeth Schussler Fiorenza and M. Shawn Copeland (eds.), Feminist Theology in Different Contexts (Maryknoll: Orbis Books), p.143.Google Scholar
  12. 44.
    Lawrence, F. (1993). “The Fragility of Consciousness: Lonergan and the Postmodern Concern for the Other.” In Theological Studies 54, p.82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 46.
    Wiggins, J. B. (1996). In Praise of Religious Diversity (New York: Routledge), p.13.Google Scholar
  14. 47.
    Tracy, D. (1987). “Christianity in the Wider Context: Demands and Transformations.” In Religion and Intellectual Life 4, p.12.Google Scholar
  15. 49.
    Lonergan, B. J. F. (1972). Method in Theology (New York: Herder and Herder), pp.13–14.Google Scholar
  16. 52.
    This is a distinction in Lonergan’s notion of dialectic by Robert Doran. See Robert Doran, M. (1990). Theology and the Dialectics of History (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), p.10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carmel Borg and Michael Grech 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren J. Dias

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations