Skip to main content

Does Democracy Promote Peace? A Rancière Reading of Politics and Democracy

  • Chapter
  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

The above two quotes capture the issue that this chapter addresses: the relationship of democracy to peace. With almost a difference of one hundred years and relatively different economic and political situations, Wilson and Sen seem to agree that democratic politics and practices lead to peace.

A steadfast concert for peace can never be maintained except by a partnership of democratic nations. No autocratic government could be trusted to keep faith within it or observe its covenants. It must be a league of honour, a partnership of opinion. Intrigue would eat its vitals away; the plottings of inner circles who could plan what they would and render account to no one would be a corruption seated at its very heart. Only free peoples can hold their purpose and their honour steady to a common end and prefer the interests of mankind to any narrow interest of their own.

Wilson’s War Message to Congress, 1917.

Democracy is more than a collection of specific institutions, such as balloting and elections – these institutions are important too, but as part of a bigger engagement involving dialogue, freedom of information, and unrestricted discussion. These are also the central features of civil paths to peace.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biesta, G. (2010). “A New Logic of Emancipation: The Methodology of Jacques Rancière.” Educational Theory, 60, 1, pp.39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2006). Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. A. (2010). “Police and Oligarchy.” In Jean-Philippe Deranty (ed.). Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts. Durham, NC: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derycke, M. (2010). “Ignorance and Translation, ‘Artifacts’ for Practice of Equality.” Educational Philosophy and|Theory, 42, 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenoun, S., Kavanagh, J., and Rancière, J. (2000). “Jacques Rancière: Literature, Politics, Aesthetics: Approaches to Democratic Disagreement.” SubStance, 92.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeVan, M. (2011). “Four Notes for a Politics of Peace.” Peace Studies Journal, 4, 3, pp.49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, T. (2010). “Wrong, Disagreement, Subjectification.” In Jean-Philippe Deranty (ed.), Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts. Durham, NC: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2009). “Democracy Is Where We Make It: The Relevance of Jacques Rancière.” Symposium. Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy / Revue canadienne de philosophiecontinentale, 13, 1, pp.3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagia, D. and Rancière, J. (2000). “Dissention Words. A Conversation with Jacques Rancière.” Diacritics, 30, 2, pp.113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2010a). On Ignorant Schoolmasters. In Charles Bingham and GiertBiesta, G. (eds.), Rancière. Education, Truth, Emancipation. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2010b). Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Ed. and trans. Steven Corcoran. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2007a). On the Shores of Politics. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2007b). “The Emancipated Spectator.” Art Form. Available at: http://digital.mica.edu/departmental/gradphoto/public/Upload/200811/Ranciere%20%20spectator.pdf, on August 8, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2006a). “The Ethical Turn of Aesthetics and Politics.” Critical Horizons, 9, 1, p.1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2006b). Hatred of Democracy. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2004a). The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2004b). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2003). The Philosopher and His Poor. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (2001). “Ten Thesis on Politics.” Theory and Event, 5, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (1991). The Ignorant Schoolmaster: Five Lessons in Intellectual Emancipation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. (1991). “Rancière and the Practice of Equality.” Social Text, 29, pp.57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2011). Peace and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson’s War Message to Congress, 1917. Available at: wwi.lib.byu.edu/index.php/Wilson%27s_War_Message_to_Congress, on November 30, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Carmel Borg and Michael Grech

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercieca, D.P. (2014). Does Democracy Promote Peace? A Rancière Reading of Politics and Democracy. In: Borg, C., Grech, M. (eds) Lorenzo Milani’s Culture of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan’s Postcolonial Studies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-38212-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics