Because “I Care”: From an Encounter to a Political Option

  • Francois Mifsud
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Postcolonial Studies in Education book series (PCSE)


The encounter with “the other” creates a dilemma of how and in what way the self will respond to this “other.” In this chapter, the concept of “the other” is used to signify those who differ from an individual or group (“the self” or “the we”) in some way that the self/we perceives to be significant. This difference may refer to features like culture, religion, nationality, political ideology, or language. “The other” is interpreted both as a singular and as plural noun. Thus, “the other” can be either a she/he or a “they/them.”


Ethical Discourse Plural Noun Private Realm Relational Engagement Dialogical Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carnap, R. (1995). An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Ed. M. Garner. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Chérif, M. (2008). Islam and the West: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. Trans. T. Lavender Fagan. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (2007). On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. Trans. M. Dooley and M. Hughes. New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  4. ——. (2005). The Politics of Friendship. Trans. G. Collins. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. ——. (2002). Acts of Religion. Ed. G. Anidjar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. ——. (2000). Of Hospitality: Anne Defourmantelle Invites Jacques Derrida to Respond. Trans. R. Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. ——. (1998). Monolingualism of the Other Or the Prosthesis of Origin. Trans. P. Mensah. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hollis, M. (1994). The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kapuściński, R. (2008). The Other. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Levinas, E. (1999). Alterity and Transcendence. Trans. M. B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Meyers, R.G. (2006). Understanding Empiricism. Malta: Acumen.Google Scholar
  12. Mouffe, C. (2009). The Democratic Paradox. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  13. ——. (2008). On The Political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. ——. (2005). The Return of the Political. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Russel, B. (2004). History of Western Philosophy. New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  16. ——. (1992). Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. School of Barbian (2009). “Letter to a Teacher.” In C. Borg, M. Cardona, and S. Caruana (ed. and trans.), Letter to a Teacher: Lorenzo Milani’s Contribution to Critical Citizenship. Malta: Agenda.Google Scholar
  18. Tarnas, R. (1991). The Passion of Western Mind: Understanding the Ideas That Have Shaped Our World View. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Carmel Borg and Michael Grech 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francois Mifsud

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations