Skip to main content

Abstract

The former state socialist countries of Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union have been transformed into capitalist systems, albeit with substantial differences among them and from advanced capitalist systems elsewhere. The value of an institutional approach has gained recognition as neoclassical economics proved a poor guide to forms of economic development and performance. Defining these capitalisms has followed three broad routes. One follows Polanyi, embedding them in social and political development without showing links to economic performance. A second follows Hall and Soskice’s two varieties of capitalism, but this fits poorly with countries in the process of creating institutional forms. Adaptations include suggestions for new varieties. Countries of the former Soviet Union prove particularly difficult to fit into existing classifications. A third approach starts from forms of international integration and seeks institutional preconditions rather than determinants. Institutions then appear as one factor, albeit an important one, determining economic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A. and N. Thrift (1994). ‘Living in the global’ in A. Amin and N. Thrift (eds) Globalization, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beblavý, M., L. Kureková, J. Drahokoupil, M. Myant, and S. Domonkos (2012). ‘Linking labour regimes and technological innovation in central and eastern Europe: the case of automotive and software industries’. NEUJOBS Working Paper, 6/2, date accessed 15 July 2015, http://www.neujobs.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung (2011). Sustainable Governance Indicators 2011. Verlag Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh, date accessed 15 July 2015, http://www.sgi-network.org/index.php.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits (2012). Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchen, C. (2007). ‘Estonia and Slovenia as Antipodes’ in D. Lane and M. Myant (eds) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Basingstoke: Palgrave), 65–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (2001). Models of Capitalism: Growth and Stagnation in the Modern Era (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (ed) (2005). Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches (Basingstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. (2007). Post-Communist Welfare States: Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann, M. (2007). ‘The origins of Varieties of Capitalism: Lessons from post-Socialist transition in Estonia and Slovenia’ in B. Hancke, M. Rhodes, and M. Thatcher (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2007). ‘The Evolution of Varieties of Capitalism in Europe’ in B. Hancke, M. Rhodes, M. Thatcher (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and D. Soskice (eds) (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and K. Thelen (2009). ‘Institutional change in varieties of capitalism’. Socio-Economic Review, 7(34), 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancke, B., M. Rhodes M. Thatcher (2007). ‘Introduction: Beyond Varieties of Capitalism’ in B. Hancke, M. Rhodes, M. Thatcher (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • IFAD (2007). Sending Money Home: Worldwide Remittance Flows to Developing Countries (Rome: IFAD).

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2000). World Economic Outlook: Focus on Transition Economies (Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasaki, I. (2004). ‘Evolution of the government-business relationship and economic performance in former Soviet states: Order state, rescue state and punish state’. Economics of Planning, 36(3), 223–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knell, M. and M. Srholec (2007). ‘Diverging Pathways in Central and Eastern Europe’ in D. Lane and M. Myant (eds) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 40–62.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. (2007). ‘Post-State Socialism: A diversity of Capitalisms?’ in D. Lane and M. Myant (eds) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 13–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ledeneva, A. (2013). Can Russia Modernise? Sistema, Power Networks and Informal Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Myant, M. (2014a). ‘The Economies undergoing Long Transitions’ in A. Wilkinson, G. Wood, and R. Deeg (eds) Oxford Handbook of Employment Relations: Comparative Employment Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 359–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myant, M. (2014b). ‘Transforming Economies and Societies in Central Europe’ in J. Koutský, P. Raška, P. Dostál, and T. Herrschel (eds) Transitions in Regional Science — Regions in Transitions: Regional research in Central Europe (Prague: Wolters Kluwer), 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myant, M. (2009). ‘Regional theory and regional development: the example of Ústecký Region in North West Bohemia’. Geographica, 40(1), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myant, M. and J. Drahokoupil (2011). Transition Economies: Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykhnenko, V. (2007a). ‘Poland and Ukraine: Institutional Structures and Economic Performance’ in D. Lane and M. Myant (eds) Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), 124–145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mykhnenko, V. (2007b). ‘Strengths and Weaknesses of “Weak” Co-ordination: Economic institutions, revealed comparative advantages and socio-economic performance of Mixed-Market Economies in Poland and Ukraine’ in B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, and M. Thatcher (eds) Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 351–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, A. and A. Vliegenthart (2009). ‘Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe’. World Politics, 61, 670–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norkus, Z. (2012). On Baltic Slovenia and Adriatic Lithuania (Vilnius: Apostrofa).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time (New York: Farrar and Rinehart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S. (2013). ‘Entrepreneurial propensity of innovation systems: Theory, methodology and evidence’. Research Policy, 42, 1015–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S. and M. Myrzakhmet (2009). ‘Between vision and reality: Promoting innovation through technoparks in an emerging economy’. Technovation, 29, 645–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers, P., C. Williams, and J. Round (2008). ‘Workplace crime and the informal economy in Ukraine: Employee and employer perspectives’. International Journal of Social Economics, 35, 666–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2011). The Globalization Paradox: Why Global Markets, States and Democracy Can’t Coexist (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Round, J., C. Williams, and P. Rodgers (2008). ‘Corruption in the post-Soviet workplace: the experience of recent graduates in contemporary Ukraine’. Work, Employment and Society, 22, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V.A. (2002). The Futures of European Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2013). The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014 (Geneva: World Economic Forum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1922). Economy and Society, An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated by Ephraim Fischoff et al. (1978), 2 vols (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2001). World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets (Washington D.C.: The World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yakovlev, A. (2006). ‘The evolution of business: State interaction in Russia; from state capture to business capture?’ Europe-Asia Studies, 58, 1033–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweynert, J. (2007). ‘Conflicting patterns of thought in the Russian debate on transition: 1992–2002’. Europe-Asia Studies, 59(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Martin Myant

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Myant, M. (2015). Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Socialist Countries. In: Hölscher, J., Tomann, H. (eds) Palgrave Dictionary of Emerging Markets and Transition Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37138-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics