In the early phase of transition that started with the 1990s, Central and Eastern European Countries (CEEC) have pursued far-reaching vertical and individual industrial policy with the focus on privatization and restructuring of traditional industries. Also foreign investment from the West and facilitation of the development of a market economy involved massive injections of state support. With their accession to the European Union (EU), levels and forms of State aid came under critical review by the European Commission’s DG Competition. Findings suggest that once having entered the EU as full members, the new members from the East appear to have been converging into rather stringent competition cultures.


European Union Competition Policy Shipbuilding Industry European Union Accession European Union Competition Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    J. Hölscher and J. Stephan, ‘Competition and Antitrust Policy in the Enlarged European Union: A Level Playing Field?’ (2009) 47(4) J.C.M.S. 863–889.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    L.-H. Röller and C. v. Hirschhausen, ‘State Aid, Industrial Restructuring and Privatization in the New German Länder: Competition Policy with Case Studies of the Shipbuilding and Synthetic Fibres Industries’ (1996), Discussion Paper FS IV 96–13, WZB Berlin.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Hashi, I.; Hajdukovic, D. and Luci, E., Can Government Policy Influence Industrial Competitiveness? Evidence from Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. in: I. Hashi, P.J.J. Welfens and A. Wziatek-Kubiak (eds): Industrial Competitiveness and Restructuring in Enlarged Europe. How Accession Countries Catch Up and Integrate in the European Union (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007) at p. 51.Google Scholar
  4. 10.
    Fiona Wishlade, EU State Aid Control, in: R. Clarke and E.J. Morgan (eds): New Developments in UK and EU Competition Policy (Edward Elgar, 2006) at p. 233.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    I. Atanasiu, ‘State Aid in Central and Eastern Europe’, (2001) 24(2) W. Comp., at p. 263 et.seq.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    I. Hashi, ‘The Comparative Analysis of State Aid and Government Policy in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic’ (2004) Center for Social and Economic Research, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    M. Blauberger, ‘European State Aid Control in the New Member States — The Examples of Poland and the Czech Republic’ (2007) Paper prepared for the EUSA Tenth Biennial Conference, Montreal 17–18 May 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 17.
    M. Cremona, ‘State Aid Control: Substance and Procedures in the Europe Agreements and the Stabilisation and Association Agreements’ (2003) 9(3) E.L.J., at p. 287.Google Scholar
  9. 20.
    M. Blauberger, ‘Compliance with rules of negative integration: European state aid control in the new member states’ (2009) 16(7) J.E.P.P. 1030–1046.Google Scholar
  10. 21.
    G. Falkner and O. Treib, ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States’ (2008) 46(2) J.C.M.S. 293–313.Google Scholar
  11. 22.
    See e.g. R. Kattel, E. Reinert and M. Suurna, ‘Industrial Restructuring and Innovation Policy in Central and Eastern Europe since 1990’ (2009) Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics No. 23, the other canon foundation, Norway and Tallinn University of Technology, at p. 25.Google Scholar
  12. 23.
    A. Reid and V. Peter, ‘Sectoral Innovation Systems — The Policy Landscape in the EU-25’ (2008) Final report for the project Europe Innova initiative (http://www.europe-innova.org) of the European Commission’s Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General, Brussels.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    D. Ellison, ‘Competitiveness Strategies, Resource Struggles and National Interest in the New Europe’ (2005) Paper prepared for the EUSA Ninth Biennial Conference, Austin 31 March-2 April 2005 at p. 26.Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    European Commission, ‘State Aid Scoreboard’ (Autumn 2005 update), at p. 19.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    OECD, ‘Industrial Policy in OECD Countries’ (1992) Annual Review.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    K. Kuik, ‘State Aid and the 2004 Accession. Overview of Recent Developments’ (2004) E. St. A. L., 3(3) 365–373.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jens Hölscher 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jens Hölscher

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations