Core Welfare Modeling Factors

  • Chris Harris


Our objective in this book is to establish welfare functions that can be used in policy. Our key factors are utility, welfare, surplus, and inequality. We have established how these are related to the politics, political economics, and approach to contract. We now view how they are connected to each other.


Utility Function Marginal Utility Indifference Curve Capital Asset Price Model Hyperbolic Discount 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 3.
    Dodds, N. (1985), The Sociology of Money (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. II (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Misgeld (1985), “Critical Hermeneutics versus Neoparsimoniasm,” New German Critique 35: 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    First measured in this context by Allais (1953), “Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque, Critique des Postulats et Aximpoes de l’Elcole Americanine,” Econometrica 21: 503–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 7.
    See Tversky and Kahnemann (1983), “Extension versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment,” Psychological Review 90.4: 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    Kahnemann and Knetsch (1992), “Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 9.
    Gilbert (2007), Stumbling on Happiness (London, UK: Harper Collins).Google Scholar
  8. Kahneman and Snell (1992), “Predicting a Changing Taste: Do People Know What They Will Like?” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5: 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 10.
    Desvouges et al. (1992), Measuring Nonuse Damage with Contingent Valuation: An Experimental Evaluation of Accuracy (RTI Press).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    Kahneman et al. (1999), “Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions? An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 1–3: 203–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 12.
    After Arrow (1965), “Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing,” in Arrow, Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing.Google Scholar
  12. Sometimes also after de Finetti (1952), “Sulla preferibilità,” Giornale degli Economisti NS 11: 685–709, who showed the same result.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    See Gollier, C. (2004), The Economics of Risk and Time (MIT Press).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    From Machina and Viscusi (2014), Handbook on the Economics of Risk and Uncertainty, vol. I (Elsevier BV).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    See, for example, Sunstein (2013), “Is Misfearing the Problem, Is Cost-Benefit Analysis the Solution?” in Shafir, The Behavioral Foundations; or Loewenstein,Google Scholar
  16. John, and Volpp (2013), “Using Decision Errors to Help People Help Themselves,” In Shafir, The Behavioral Foundations.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Binmore (2005), Playing Fair—Game Theory and the Social Contract (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  18. Beckerman (2011), Economics as Applied Ethics: Value Judgements in Welfare Economics (Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 17.
    See Benartzi, Peleg, and Thaler (2013), “Choice Architecture and Retirement Saving Plans,” in Shafir, The Behavioral Foundations.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    Strotz (1956), “Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximisation,” Review of Economic Studies 23: 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    The term is from Robertson (1952), Utility and All That, and Other Essays (UK: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    See Cochrane (2001), Asset Pricing (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    Sunstein and Thaler (2009), Nudge (London, UK: Penguin).Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    Sinclair, C., Marstrand, P., and Newick, P. (1972). Innovation and Human Risk: The Evaluation of Human Life and Safety in Relation to Technical Change (London: Centre for the Study of Industrial Innovation).Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    Zeckhauser (1970), “Uncertainty and the Need for Collective Action,” in Haveman and Margolis, Public Expenditures and Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  26. 33.
    Sunstein (2014), Why Nudge—’The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    See Nord (1999), Cost-Value Analysis in Health Care: Making Sense Out of QALYs (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), for an exposition of this.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 37.
    See Lewbel (2006), “Engel Curves,” in Blume and Durlauf, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics.Google Scholar
  29. 38.
    See DEFRA (2009), Guidance on How to Measure and Report Your Greenhouse Gas Emissions, published by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. PB13309.Google Scholar
  30. 39.
    See Willig (1976), “Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology,” The American Economic Review 66.4: 589–97, for a more thorough exposition.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    See Harris (2014), Fixed and Variable Costs: Theory and Practice in Electricity (Palgrave), for a detailed exposition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 41.
    From Maskin (2014), “The Arrow Impossibility Theorem: Where Do We Go From Here?” in Maskin and Sen, The Arrow Impossibility Theorem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chris Harris 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Harris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations