Advertisement

Dynamic Models of Language Evolution: The Linguistic Perspective

  • Andrew D. M. Smith

Abstract

Language is probably the key defining characteristic of humanity, an immensely powerful tool which provides its users with an infinitely expressive means of representing their complex thoughts and reflections, and of successfully communicating them to others. It is the foundation on which human societies have been built and the means through which humanity’s unparalleled intellectual and technological achievements have been realized. Although we have a natural intuitive understanding of what a language is, the specification of a particular language is nevertheless remarkably difficult, if not impossible, to pin down precisely. All languages contain many separate yet integral systems which work interdependently to allow the expression of our thoughts and the interpretation of others’ expressions: each has, for instance, a set of basic meaningless sounds (e.g. [e], [l], [s]) which can be combined to make different meaningful words and parts of words (e.g. else, less, sell, -less); these meaningful units can be combined to make complex words (e.g. spinelessness, selling), and the words themselves can then be combined in very many complex ways into phrases, clauses and an infinite number of meaningful sentences; finally each of these sentences can be interpreted in dramatically different ways, depending on the contexts in which it is uttered and on who is doing the interpretation. Languages can be analysed at any of these different levels, which make up many of the sub-fields of linguistics, and the primary job of linguistic theorists is to try to explain the rules which best explain these complex combinations.

Keywords

Noun Phrase Linguistic Diversity Complex Adaptive System Language Family Language Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Aitchison (1996) The Seeds of Speech: Language Origin and Evolution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Q. Atkinson, A. Meade, C. Venditti, S. Greenhill, and M. Pagel (2008) ‘Languages Evolve in Punctuational Bursts’, Science, 319, 588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. R. Bateman, I. Goddard, R. O’Grady, V. Funk, R. Mooi, J. Krees, and P. Cannell (1990) ‘Speaking of Forked Tongues: The Feasibility of Reconciling Human Phylogeny and the History of Language’, Current Anthropology, 31, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. Baxter, R. Blythe, W. Croft, and A. McKane (2009) ‘Modeling Language Change: An Evaluation of Trudgill’s Theory of the Emergence of New Zealand English’, Language Variation and Change, 21, 257–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Beckner, R. Blythe, J. Bybee, M. Christiansen, W. Croft, N. Ellis, J. Holland, J. Ke, D. Larsen-Freeman, and T. Schoenemann (2009) ‘Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper’, Language Learning, 59, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Bergslund and H. Vogt (1962) ‘On the Validity of Glottochronology’, Current Anthropology, 3, 115–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Beuls and L. Steels (2013) ‘Agent-based Models of Strategies for the Emergence and Evolution of Grammatical Agreement’, PLoS One, 8, 358960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Blythe and W. Croft (2012) ‘S-curves and the Mechanisms of Propagation in Language Change’, Language, 88, 269–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Bolinger (1975) Aspects of Language (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).Google Scholar
  10. H. Bowe and S. Morey (1999) The Yorta Yorta (Bangerang) Language of the Murray Goulburn, Including Yabula Yabula (Canberra: Pacific Linguistics).Google Scholar
  11. H. Brighton, K. Smith, and S. Kirby (2005) ‘Language as an Evolutionary System’, Physics of Life Reviews, 2, 177–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. P. Brown (2001) ‘Learning to Talk about Motion UP and DOWN in Tzeltal: Is There a Language-Specific Bias for Verb Learning?’ In M. Bowerman and S. Levinson (eds.) Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 512–543 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Brown (2006) ‘A Sketch of the Grammar of Space in Tzeltal’ In S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, 230–272 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. M. Butskhrikidze (2002) The Consonant Phonotactics of Georgian (Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap).Google Scholar
  15. J. Bybee (2006) ‘From Usage to Grammar: The Mind’s Response to Repetition’, Language, 82, 711–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. C. Caldwell and K. Smith (2012) ‘Cultural Evolution and Perpetuation of Arbitrary Communicative Conventions in Experimental Microsocieties’, PLoS One, 7, e43807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Campbell (1988) ‘Review of: Language in the Americas, J. H. Greenberg’, Language, 64, 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. L. Campbell (2004) Historical Linguistics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  19. L. Campbell and W. Poser (2008) Language Classification: History and Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Cavalli-Sforza, P. Menozzi, A. Piazza, and J. Mountain (1988) ‘Reconstruction of Human Evolution: Bringing Together Genetic, Archaeological and Linguistic Data’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 85, 6002–6006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Chater and M. Christiansen (2009) ‘Language Acquisition Meets Language Evolution’, Cognitive Science, 34, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. N. Chater, F. Reali, and M. Christiansen (2009) ‘Restrictions on Biological Adaptation in Language Evolution’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 1015–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. M. Chen and W. Wang (1975) ‘Sound Change: Actuation and Implementation’, Language, 51, 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. N. Chomsky (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  25. N. Chomsky (1980) Rules and Representations (London: Basil Blackwell).Google Scholar
  26. M. Christiansen and N. Chater (2008) ‘Language as Shaped by the Brain’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 489–508.Google Scholar
  27. H. Clark (1996) Using Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. G. Clements (2000) ‘Phonology’ In B. Heine and D. Nurse (eds.) African Languages: An Introduction, 132–160 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  29. F. Coulmas (2013) Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers’ Choices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. W. Croft (2000) Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach (Singapore: Longman).Google Scholar
  31. B. de Boer (2001) The Origins of Vowel Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  32. F. de Saussure (1916) Cours de Linguistique Générale (Paris: Payot).Google Scholar
  33. T. Deacon (1997) The Symbolic Species (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
  34. D. Dediu and R. Ladd (2007) ‘Linguistic Tone Is Related to the Population Frequency of the Adaptive Haplogroups of Two Brain Size Genes, Aspm and Microcephalin’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 10944–10949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. G. Deutscher (2010) Through the Language Glass: How Words Colour Your World (London: William Heinemann).Google Scholar
  36. R. Dixon (1972) The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R. Dixon (1997) The Rise and Fall of Languages (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. A. Drummond and M. Suchard (2010) ‘Bayesian Random Local Clocks, or One rate to Rule them all’, BioMed Central Biology, 8, 114.Google Scholar
  39. M. Dryer (2013a) ‘Order of Subject, Object and Verb’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds.) The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).Google Scholar
  40. M. Dryer (2013b) ‘Prefixing vs. Suffixing in Inflectional Morphology’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds.) The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).Google Scholar
  41. N. Evans (2010) Dying Words: Endangered Languages and What They Have to Tell Us (Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
  42. N. Evans and S. Levinson (2009) ‘The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and Its Importance for Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. C. Everett (2013) ‘Evidence for Direct Geographic Influences on Linguistic Sounds: The Case of Ejectives’, PLoS One, 8, e65275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. C. Everett, D. Blasi, and S. Roberts (2015) ‘Climate, Vocal Folds, and Tonal Languages: Connecting the Physiological and Geographic Dots’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 1322–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. G. Fauconnier and M. Turner (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  46. W. Foley (1997) Anthropological Linguistics: An Introduction (London: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  47. B. Galantucci (2005) ‘An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems’, Cognitive Science, 29, 737–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. S. Garrod, N. Fay, J. Lee, J. Oberlander, and T. MacLeod (2007) ‘Foundations of Representations: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From?’, Cognitive Science, 31, 961–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. M. Gell-Mann (1994) The Quark and the Jaguar (New York: Freeman).Google Scholar
  50. C. Goddard (2005) The Languages of East and Southeast Asia (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  51. T. Gong, L. Shuai, M. Tamariz, and G. Jäger (2012) ‘Studying Language Change Using Price Equation and Pólya-urn Dynamics’, PLoS One, 7, e33171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R. Gray and Q. Atkinson (2003) ‘Language-tree Divergence Times Support the Anatolian Theory of Indo-European Origins’, Nature, 426, 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R. Gray and F. Jordan (2000) ‘Language Trees Support the Express-Train Sequence of Austronesian Expansion’, Nature, 405, 1052–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. J. Greenberg (1963) ‘Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements’ In J. Greenberg Universals of Language, 2nd edition, 73–113 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  55. J. Greenberg (1987) Language in the Americas (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  56. R. Greenberg (2004) Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and Its Disintegration (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  57. P. Grice (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’ In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, volume 3, 41–58 (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  58. C. Hall (1988) ‘Integrating Diachronic and Processing Principles in Explaining the Suffix Preference’ In J. Hawkins (ed.) Explaining Language Universals, 321–349 (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  59. R. Harlow (2007) Māori: A Linguistic Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. S. Harrison (2005) ‘On the Limits of the Comparative Method’ In B. Joseph and R. Janda (eds.) The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 213–243 (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  61. M. Haspelmath, M. Dryer, D. Gil, and B. Comrie (eds.) (2005) The World Atlas of Linguistic Structures (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  62. M. Hauser, N. Chomsky, and T. Fitch (2002) ‘The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It and How Did It Evolve?’, Science, 298, 1569–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. B. Heine and T. Kuteva (2005) Language Contact and Grammatical Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. B. Heine and T. Kuteva (2006) The Changing Language of Europe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. C. Hockett (1960) ‘The Origin of Speech’, Scientific American, 203, 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. S. Höfler and A. Smith (2009) ‘The Pre-Linguistic Basis of Grammaticalisation: A Unified Approach to Metaphor and Reanalysis’, Studies in Language, 33, 886–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. C. Holden (2002) ‘Bantu Language Trees Reflect the Spread of Farming Across sub-Saharan Africa: A Maximum-Parsimony Analysis’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 793–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. C. Holden and R. Gray (2006) ‘Rapid Radiation, Borrowing, and Dialect Continua in the Bantu Languages’ In P. Forster and C. Renfrew (eds.) Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, 19–31 (Cambridge: MacDonald Institute Press).Google Scholar
  69. J. Holmes (2013) An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, 4th edition (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  70. P. Hopper (1987) ‘Emergent Grammar’, Berkeley Linguistics Conference (BLS), 13, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. D. Hull (1988) Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. J. Hurford (1989) ‘Biological Evolution of the Saussurean Sign as a Component of the Language Acquisition Device’, Lingua, 77, 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. J. Hurford (1991) ‘The Evolution of Critical Period for Language Acquisition’, Cognition, 40, 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. M. Israel (2014) ‘Semantics: How Language Makes Sense’ In C. Genetti How Languages Work: An Introduction to Language and Linguistics, 150–179 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  75. A. Kandler, R. Unger, and J. Steele (2010) ‘Language Shift, Bilingualism and the Future of Britain’s Celtic Languages’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B — Biological Sciences, 365, 3855–3864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. A. Kassian, G. Starostin, A. Dybo, and V. Chernov (2010) ‘The Swadesh Wordlist: An Attempt at Semantic Specification’, Journal of Language Relationship, 4, 46–89.Google Scholar
  77. A. Kinsella (2009) Language Evolution and Syntactic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. S. Kirby (2000) ‘Syntax without Natural Selection: How Compositionality Emerges from Vocabulary in a Population of Learners’ In C. Knight, M. Studdert-Kennedy and J. Hurford (eds.) The Evolutionary Emergence of Language: Social Function and the Origins of Linguistic Form, 303–323 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. S. Kirby (2001) ‘Spontaneous Evolution of Linguistic Structure: An Iterated Learning Model of the Emergence of Regularity and Irregularity’, IEEE Journal of Evolutionary Computation, 5, 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. S. Kirby and J. Hurford (2002) ‘The Emergence of Linguistic Structure: An Overview of the Iterated Learning Model’ In A. Cangelosi and D. Parisi (eds.) Simulating the Evolution of Language, 121–148 (London: Springer Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. S. Kirby, H. Cornish, and K. Smith (2008) ‘Cumulative Cultural Evolution in the Lab: An Experimental Approach to the Origins of Structure in Human Language’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 10681–10686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. S. Kirby, M. Tamariz, H. Cornish, and K. Smith (2015) ‘Compression and Communication in the Cultural Evolution of Linguistic Structure’, Cognition, 141, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. M. Krauss (1992) ‘The World’s Languages in Crisis’, Language, 68, 4–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. M. Krifka (2001) ‘Compositionality’ In R. Wilson and F. Keil (eds.) The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences, 152–153 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  85. W. Labov (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar
  86. P. Ladefoged and K. Johnson (2011) A Course in Phonetics, 6th edition (London: Wadsworth).Google Scholar
  87. R. Lees (1953) ‘The Basis of Glottochronology’, Language, 29, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. S. Levinson (1997) ‘Language and Cognition: The Cognitive Consequences of Spatial Description in Guugu Yimithirr’, Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 7, 98–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. S. Levinson (2006) ‘The Language of Space in Yélî Dnye’ In S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, 157–205 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) (2006) Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  91. P. Lewis (2005) Ethnologue: Languages of the World (Dallas: SIL International).Google Scholar
  92. G. Lupyan and R. Dale (2010) ‘Language Structure Is Partly Determined Bysocial Structure’, PLoS One, 5, e8559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. L. Maffi (2001) On Biocultural Diversity: Linking Language, Knowledge and the Environment (Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press).Google Scholar
  94. A. Martinet (1949) ‘La double articulation linguistique’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistic de Copenhague, 5, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. W. McGregor (2006) ‘Prolegomenon to a Warrwa Grammar of Space’ In S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, 115–156 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. A. McMahon (1994) Understanding Language Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. A. McMahon and R. McMahon (1995) ‘Linguistics, Genetics and Archaeology: Internal and External Evidence in the Amerind Controversy’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 93, 125–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. A. McMahon and R. McMahon (2000) ‘Problems of Dating and Time Depth in Linguistics and Biology’ In C. Renfrew, A. McMahon and L. Trask (eds.) Time Depth in Historical Linguistics (2 vols.), 59–74 (Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research).Google Scholar
  99. A. McMahon and R. McMahon (2003) ‘Finding Families: Quantitative Methods in Language Classification’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 101, 7–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. A. McMahon and R. McMahon (2005) Language Classification by Numbers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  101. J. Milroy (1980) Language and Social Networks (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  102. M. Mithun (1991) ‘Active/Agentive Case Marking and Its Motivations’, Language, 67, 510–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. E. Moore (2004) ‘Sociolinguistic Style: A Multidimensional Resource for Shared identity Creation’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 49, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. S. Mufwene (2002) ‘Competition and Selection in Language Evolution’, Selection, 3, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. S. Munroe and A. Cangelosi (2002) ‘Learning and the Evolution of Language: The Role of Cultural Variation and Learning Costs in the Baldwin Effect’, Artificial Life, 8, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. L. Nakhleh, D. Ringe, and T. Warnow (2005) ‘Perfect Phylogenetic Networks: A New Methodology for Reconstructing the Evolutionary History of Natural Languages’, Language, 81, 382–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. D. Nettle (1999) ‘Is the Rate of Linguistic Change Constant?’, Lingua, 108, 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. D. Nettle and S. Romaine (2000) Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  109. P.-Y. Oudeyer (2006) The Self-Organization of Speech (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. M. Pagel and A. Meade (2004) ‘A Phylogenetic Mixture Model for Detecting Pattern-Heterogeneity in Gene Sequence of Character-State Data’, Systematic Biology, 53, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. J. Pierrehumbert, M. Beckman, and R. Ladd (2000) ‘Conceptual Foundations of Phonology as a Laboratory Science’ In N. Burton-Roberts, P. Carr and G. Docherty (eds.) Conceptual and Empirical Foundations of Phonology, 273–303 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  112. S. Pinker and P. Bloom (1990) ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. G. Price (1970) ‘Selection and Covariance’, Nature, 227, 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. G. Pullum and B. Scholz (2002) ‘Empirical Assessment of Stimulus Poverty Arguments’, The Linguistic Review, 19, 9–50.Google Scholar
  115. F. Reali and M. Christiansen (2005) ‘Uncovering the Richness of the Stimulus: Structure Dependence and Indirect Statistical Evidence’, Cognitive Science, 29, 1007–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. F. Reali, M. Christiansen, and P. Monaghan (2003) ‘Phonological and Distributional Cues in Syntax Acquisition: Scaling Up the Connectionist Approach to Multiple-Cue Integration’ In R. Alterman and D. Kirsh (eds.) Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 970–975 (Boston: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).Google Scholar
  117. S. Roberts and J. Winters (2013) ‘Linguistic Diversity and Traffic Accidents: Lessons from Statistical Studies of Cultural Traits’, PLoS One, 8, e70902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. E. Round (2009) ‘Kayardild Morphology, Phonology and Morphosyntax’, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
  119. M. Ruhlen (1991) A Guide to the World’s Languages (London: Arnold).Google Scholar
  120. M. Ruhlen (1994) On the Origin of Languages: Studies in Linguistic Taxonomy (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  121. G. Sankoff (2004) ‘Linguistic Outcomes of Language Contact’ In J. Chambers, P. Trudgill and N. Schilling-Estes (eds.) The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 638–668 (Oxford: Wiley).Google Scholar
  122. H. Schmidt and A. von Haeseler (2009) ‘Phylogenetic Inference Using Maximum Likelihood Methods’ In P. Lemey, M. Salemi and A. Vandamme (eds.) The Phylogenetic Handbook: A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis and Hypothesis Testing, 181–209 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. E. Schultze-Berndt (2006) ‘Sketch of a Jaminjung Grammar of Space’ In S. Levinson and D. Wilkins (eds.) Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity, 63–114 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. T. Scott-Phillips (2014) Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication Is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make It Special (London: Palgrave MacMillan).Google Scholar
  125. T. Scott-Phillips, S. Kirby, and G. Ritchie (2009) ‘Signalling Signalhood and the Emergence of Communication’, Cognition, 113, 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. C. Shannon (1948) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Communication’, Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. P. Siptár and M. Törkenczy (2000) The Phonology of Hungarian (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  128. A. Smith (2005) ‘The Inferential Transmission of Language’, Adaptive Behavior, 13, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. A. Smith (2008) ‘Protolanguage Reconstructed’, Interaction Studies, 9, 100–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. A. Smith and S. Höfler (2015) ‘The Pivotal Role of Metaphor in the Evolution of Human Language’ In J. Díaz Vera Metaphor and Metonymy across Time and Cultures, 123–139 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  131. K. Smith (2004) ‘The Evolution of Vocabulary’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 228, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. K. Smith (2011) ‘Why Formal Models Are Useful for Evolutionary Linguists’ In K. Gibson and M. Tallerman (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, 581–588 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  133. K. Smith and S. Kirby (2008) ‘Cultural Evolution: Implications for Understanding the Human Language Faculty and Its Evolution’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B — Biological Sciences, 363, 3591–3603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. K. Smith, H. Brighton, and S. Kirby (2003a) ‘Complex Systems in Language Evolution: The Cultural Emergence of Compositional Structure’, Advances in Complex Systems, 6, 537–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. K. Smith, S. Kirby, and H. Brighton (2003b) ‘Iterated Learning: A Frame Work for the Emergence of Language’, Artificial Life, 9, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. J.-J. Song (2001) Linguistic Typology: Morphology and Syntax (Harlow: Longman).Google Scholar
  137. D. Sperber and D. Wilson (1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  138. L. Steels (1999) The Talking Heads Experiment (Antwerpen: Laboratorium), special pre-edition.Google Scholar
  139. L. Steels (2011) Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  140. L. Steels and T. Belpaeme (2005) ‘Coordinating Perceptually Grounded Categories through Language: A Case Study for Colour’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 469–529.Google Scholar
  141. M. Swadesh (1952) ‘Lexico-statistic Dating of Prehistoric Ethnic Contacts’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 96, 453–463.Google Scholar
  142. L. Talmy (2000) Towards a Cognitive Semantics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  143. C. Theisen, J. Oberlander, and S. Kirby (2010) ‘Systematicity and Arbitrariness in Novel Communication Systems’, Interaction Studies, 11, 14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. M. Tomasello (2008) Origins of Human Communication (Harvard: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  145. M. Tomasello, M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, and H. Moll (2005) ‘Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675–735.Google Scholar
  146. L. Trask (1996) Historical Linguistics (London: Arnold).Google Scholar
  147. G. Trousdale (2010) An Introduction to English Sociolinguistics (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  148. P. Trudgill (1972) ‘Sex, Covert Prestige, and Linguistic Change in the Urban British English of Norwich’, Language in Society, 1, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. P. Trudgill (2008) ‘Colonial Dialect Contact in the History of European Languages: On the Irrelevance of Identity to New-dialect Formation’, Language in Society, 37, 241–280.Google Scholar
  150. W. Turkel (2002) ‘The Learning Guided Evolution of Natural Language’ In E. Briscoe Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models, 235–254 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. R. van Trijp (2012) ‘The Evolution of Case Systems for Marking Event Structure’ In L. Steels Experiments in Cultural Language Evolution, 169–206 (Oxford: John Benjamins).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. P. Vogt (2005) ‘The Emergence of Compositional Structures in Perceptually Grounded Language Games’, Artificial Intelligence, 167, 206–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. A. Wedel (2006) ‘Exemplar Models, Evolution and Language Change’, The Linguistic Review, 23, 247–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. A. Wray and G. Grace (2007) ‘The Consequences of Talking to Strangers: Evolutionary Corollaries of Socio-Cultural Influences on Linguistic Form’, Lingua, 117, 543–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. H. Yamauchi (2001) ‘The Difficulty of the Baldwinian Account of Linguistic Innateness’ In J. Kelemen and P. Sosík (eds.) Advances in Artificial Life: Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Artificial Life, 391–400 (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. E. Zsiga (2013) The Sounds of Language: An Introduction to Phonetics and Phonology (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar
  157. W. Zuidema (2003) ‘How the Poverty of the Stimulus Solves the Poverty of the Stimulus’ In S. Becker, S. Thrun and K. Obermayer (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15 (Proceedings of NIPS’02), 51–58 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  158. W. Zuidema and B. de Boer (2009) ‘The Evolution of Combinatorial Phonology’, Journal of Phonetics, 37, 125–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew D. M. Smith 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew D. M. Smith

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations