Skip to main content

Linguistic Theory, Linguistic Diversity and Whorfian Economics

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language

Abstract

I begin this chapter by illustrating what theoretical linguists do and why generative linguistics in particular has argued that linguistic data is more abstract and more complex than at first appears. I then illustrate language diversity by comparing aspects of two languages, English and Ma’di, an East African language. Sections 1.2 and 1.3 focus on specific aspects of linguistic data, which are chosen to illustrate general points about linguistic theory and linguistic diversity. In Section 1.4, I briefly note several different theories of linguistic diversity which explore why languages vary and whether variation is limited by internal (psychological) or external (cultural) factors. In Section 1.5, I examine the ‘Whorfian’ hypothesis that linguistic form has a causal relation with thought and behaviour, summarize some of the relevant psycholinguistic work and then examine some articles by economists which claim causal relations between linguistic and social variation. Based in part on what I have said about linguistic theory and linguistic diversity, and in particular the abstractness of linguistic data, I will argue that the economists’ claims cannot be sustained. In the final part of the chapter I discuss some ways in which stylistic variation within a language might affect thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 264.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • T. Au (1983) ‘Chinese and English Counterfactuals: The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Revisited’, Cognition, 15, 155–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Bassetti (2014) ‘Is Grammatical Gender Considered Arbitrary or Semantically Motivated? Evidence from Young Adult Monolinguals, Second Language Learners, and Early Bilinguals’, British Journal of Psychology, 105, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bender, S. Beller and G. Bennardo (2010) ‘Temporal Frames of Reference: Conceptual Analysis and Empirical Evidence from German, English, Mandarin Chinese, and Tongan’, Journal of Cognition and Culture, 10, 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Bernstein (1971) Class, Codes and Control. Volume 1: Theoretical Studies towards a Sociology of Language (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R. Berwick, P. Pietroski, B. Yankama and N. Chomsky (2011) ‘Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited’, Cognitive Science, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. den Besten (1983) ‘On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules’, revised version of a paper in Studies in West Germanic Syntax, Dissertatie Tilburg, 1989, 20, 14–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Biberauer, A. Holmberg and I. Roberts (2007) ‘Disharmonic Word-order Systems and the Final-over-Final-Constraint (FOFC)’ In A. Bisetto and F. Barbieri (eds) Proceedings of XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. Available at http://amsacta.cib.unibo.it/archive/00002397/01/PROCEEDINGS_IGG.pdf

  • M. Blackings and N. Fabb (2003) A Grammar of Ma’di (Berlin: Mouton).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • A. Bloom (1981) The Linguistic Shaping of Thought: A Study in the Impact of Language on Thinking in China and the West (Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Boroditsky (2001) ‘Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time’, Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Boroditsky, L Schmidt and W. Phillips (2003) ‘Sex, Syntax, and Semantics’ In D. Gentner and S. Goldin-Meadow (eds) Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Cognition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Boutonnet, P. Athanasopoulos and G. Thierry (2012) ‘Unconscious Effects of Grammatical Gender during Object Categorisation’, Brain Research, 1479, 72–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.-Y. Chen (2007) ‘Do Chinese and English Speakers Think about Time Differently? Failure of Replicating Boroditsky (2001)’, Cognition, 104, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Chen (2013) ‘The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets’, The American Economic Review, 103, 690–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1957) Syntactic Structures (The Hague: Mouton).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1981) Lectures on Government and Binding (Dordrecht: Foris).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky (1995) The Minimalist Program (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Chomsky and M. Halle (1968) The Sound Pattern of English (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Cinque (2013) ‘Cognition, Universal Grammar, and Typological Generalizations’, Lingua, 130, 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Cole, G. Hermon and L-M. Sung (1990) ‘Principles and Parameters of Long-Distance Reflexives’, Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Corbett (1991) Gender (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • G. Corbett (2013) ‘“30 Number of Genders”, “31 Sex-based and Non-sex-based Gender Systems”, “32 Systems of Gender Assignment”’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Cubelli, D. Paolieri, L. Lotto and R. Job (2011) ‘The Effect of Grammatical Gender on Object Categorization’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 449–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ö. Dahl and V. Velupillai (2013) ‘Tense and Aspect’ In Matthew S. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology). Available online at http://wals.info/chapter/s7 (Accessed on 2014-06-16).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Dediu and D. R. Ladd (2007) ‘Linguistic Tone Is Related to the Population Frequency of the Adaptive Haplogroups of Two Brain Size Genes, ASPM and Microcephalin’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 10944–10949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Dryer (2013) ‘144 Position of Negative Morpheme with Respect to Subject, Object, and Verb’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Evans and S. Levinson (2009) ‘The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Gay, E. Santacreu-Vasut and A. Shoham (2013) ‘The Grammatical Origins of Gender Roles’, BEHL Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Gleitman and A. Papafragou (2005) ‘Language and Thought’ In K. Holyoak and R. Morrison (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 633–662 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Haegeman and T. Ihsane (2001) ‘Adult Null Subjects in the Non-pro-drop Languages: Two Diary Dialects’, Language Acquisition, 9, 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Harley and E. Ritter (2002) ‘Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis’, Language, 78, 482–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Hasher, D. Goldstein and T. Toppino (1977) ‘Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity’, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 107–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Haspelmath (2013) ‘34 Occurrence of Nominal Plurality’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hill and B. Mannheim (1992) ‘Language and World View’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 381–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C-T. J. Huang (1989) ‘Pro Drop in Chinese: A Generalized Control Approach’ In O. Jaeggli and K. Safir (eds) The Null Subject Parameter, 185–214 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • M. Imai, L. Schalk, H. Saalbach and H. Okada (2014) ‘All Giraffes Have Female-Specific Properties: Influence of Grammatical Gender on Deductive Reasoning about Sex-Specific Properties in German Speakers’, Cognitive Science, 38, 514–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. January and E. Kako (2007) ‘Re-evaluating Evidence for Linguistic Relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001)’, Cognition, 104, 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Kashima and Y. Kashima (1998) ‘Culture and Language: The Case of Cultural Dimensions and Personal Pronoun Use’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 461–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Kashima and Y. Kashima (2005) ‘Erratum to Kashima and Kashima (1998) and Reiteration’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 396–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Levinson (1996) ‘Frames of Reference and Molyneux’s Question: Crosslinguistic Evidence’ In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett (eds) Language and Space, 109–169 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Levinson (1997) ‘From Outer to Inner Space: Linguistic Categories and Non-linguistic Thinking’ In J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds) Language and Conceptualization, 13–45 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • S. Levinson (2003) Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • P. Li, L. Abarbanell, L. Gleitman and A. Papafragou (2011) ‘Spatial Reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans’, Cognition, 120, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Li and L. Gleitman (2002) ‘Turning the Tables: Language and Spatial Reasoning’, Cognition, 83, 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Licht, C. Goldschmidt and S. Schwartz (2007) ‘Culture Rules: The Foundations of the Rule of Law and other Norms of Governance’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 659–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Lucy (1997) ‘Linguistic Relativity’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Maddieson (2013) ‘1 Consonant Inventories’, ‘2 Vowel Quality Inventories’, ‘7 Glottalized Consonants’, ‘12 Syllable Structure’, ‘13 Tone’, ‘19 Presence of Uncommon Consonants’ In M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Mavisakalyan (2011) ‘Gender in Language and Gender in Employment’, ANUCBE School of Economics Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. McGlone and J. Tofighbakhsh (2000) ‘Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in Aphorisms’, Psychological Science, 11, 424–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Nichols (2012) ‘Monogenesis or Polygenesis: A Single Ancestral Language for All Humanity?’ In M. Tallerman and K. Gibson (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Prewitt-Freilino, T. Caswell and E. Laakso (2012) ‘The Gendering of Language: A Comparison of Gender Equality in Countries with Gendered, Natural Gender, and Genderless Languages’, Sex Roles, 66, 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Rizzi (2013) ‘Introduction: Core Computational Principles in Natural Language Syntax’, Lingua, 130, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Roberts and J. Winters (2012) ‘Social Structure and Language Structure: The New Nomothetic Approach’, Psychology of Language and Communication, 16, 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Roberts and J. Winters (2013) ‘Linguistic Diversity and Traffic Accidents: Lessons from Statistical Studies of Cultural Traits’, PLOS1 August 14, 2013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070902

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Santacreu-Vasut, A. Shoham and V. Gay (2013) ‘Do Female/Male Distinctions in Language Matter? Evidence from Gender Political Quotas’, Applied Economics Letters, 20, 495–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Santacreu-Vasut, O. Shenkar and A. Shoham (2014) ‘Linguistic Gender Marking and its International Business Ramifications’, Journal of International Business Studies, 47, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Tabellini (2008) ‘Institutions and Culture’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 255–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Tversky, and D. Kahneman (1981) ‘The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice’, Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Vigliocco, D. Vinson, F. Paganelli and K. Dworzynski (2005) ‘Grammatical Gender Effects on Cognition: Implication for Language Learning and Language Use’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Websites

  • http://www.replicatedtypo.com. This is a blog on evolutionary linguistics, which has involved extensive critical discussion of correlations between social and linguistic factors, including some of the work in economics.

  • http://wals.info. The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS). The largest database of typological linguistic information, freely available online.

  • http://sswl.railsplayground.net. Syntactic Structures of the World’s Languages (SSWL): Another freely available online typological database, strongly influenced by generative linguistics.

  • http://www.ethnologue.com. A catalogue of over 7,000 languages of the world.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Nigel Fabb

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fabb, N. (2016). Linguistic Theory, Linguistic Diversity and Whorfian Economics. In: Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics