Skip to main content

Abstract

Language proficiency is extremely important for international migrants. Better language proficiency means easier assimilation in the host country and greater returns to human capital as well as better job opportunities and job matches, among other things. In addition language skills surely influence a number of non-economic outcomes such as social integration, the size of the migrant’s social network, his or her political participation and civic engagement, as well as educational attainment, health outcomes and family life. Familiarity with the destination language helps to minimize migration costs (both the direct out-of-pocket expenses and the psychological costs of leaving the home country) and serves as an informational channel to learn about other determinants of migration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 264.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • A. Adserà and B. Chiswick (2007) ‘Are There Gender Differences in Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes Across European Countries?’, Journal of Population Economics, 20, 495–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Adserà and A. Ferrer (2014a) ‘Factors Influencing the Fertility Choices of Child Immigrants in Canada’, Population Studies, 68, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Adserà and A. Ferrer (2014b) ‘The Effect of Linguistic Proximity on the Occupational Assimilation of Immigrant Men’, CLSRN Working Paper 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Adserà and A. Ferrer (2014c) ‘The Myth of Immigrant Women as Secondary Workers: Evidence from Canada’, American Economic Review, 104, 360–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Adserà and M. Pytliková (2015) ‘The Role of Languages in Shaping International Migration’, Economic Journal, 586, 49–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Akresh, P. Verwimp and T. Bundervoet (2007) ‘Civil War, Crop Failure, and Child Stunting in Rwanda’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4208.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Andersson and L. Nekby (2012) ‘Intensive Coaching of New Immigrants: An Evaluation Based on Random Program Assignment’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 114, 575–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Aydemir (2011) ‘Immigrant Selection and Short-Term Labor Market Outcomes by Visa Category’, Journal of Population Economics, 24, 451–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Azam, A. Chin and N. Prakash (2013) ‘The Returns to English-language Skills in India’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 61, 335–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Bauer, G. Epstein and I. Gang (2005) ‘Enclaves, Language, and the Location Choice of Migrants’, Journal of Population Economics, 18, 649–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Beckhusen, F. Raymond, T. de Graaff, J. Poot and B. Waldorf (2013) ‘Living and Working in Ethnic Enclaves: Language Proficiency of Immigrants in U.S. Metropolitan Areas’, Papers in Regional Science, 92, 305–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Beine, F. cquier and C. Ozden (2011) ‘Diasporas’, Journal of Development Economics, 95, 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Beine and S. Salomone (2013) ‘Network Effect in International Migration: Does Education Matter more than Gender?’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115, 354–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Belot and S. Ederveen (2012) ‘Cultural and Institutional Barriers in Migration between OECD Countries’, Journal of Population Economics, 25, 1077–1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Belot and T. Hatton (2012) ‘Skill Selection and Immigration in OECD countries’, Scandinavian Journal of Economic, 114, 681–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bertrand, M. Luttmer and S. Mullainathan (2000) ‘Network Effects and Welfare Cultures’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 1019–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Bleakley and A. Chin (2004) ‘Language Skills and Earnings: Evidence from Childhood Immigrants’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Bleakley and A. Chin (2008) ‘The Intergenerational Transmission of Language Human Capital among Immigrants’, Journal of Human Resources, 43, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Bleakley and A. Chin (2010) ‘Age at Arrival, English Proficiency, and Social Assimilation among US Immigrants’, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 165–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Boyd (2009) ‘Language at Work: The Impact of Linguistic Enclaves on Immigrant Economic Integration’, Canadian Labour Market and Skills Researcher Network Working Paper No. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Budría and P. Swedberg (2012) ‘The Impact of Language Proficiency on Immigrants’ Earnings in Spain’, IZA Discussion Paper No. 6957.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Casale and D. Posel (2011) ‘English Language Proficiency and Earnings in a Developing Country: The Case of South Africa’, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Casey and C. Dustmann (2008) ‘Intergenerational Transmission of Language Capital and Economic Outcomes’, Journal of Human Resources, 43, 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick (1991) ‘Speaking, Reading and Earnings among Low-Skilled Immigrants’, Journal of Labor Economics, 9, 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick (1998) ‘Hebrew Language Usage: Determinants and Effects on Earnings Among Immigrants in Israel’, Journal of Population Economics, 11(2), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick (1999) ‘Are Immigrants Favorably Self-Selected?’, American Economic Review, 89, 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick (2008) ‘The Economics of Language: An Introduction and Overview’, IZA Working Paper 3568.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (1994) ‘The Complementarity of Language and Other Human Capital: Immigrant Earnings in Canada’, Economics of Education Review, 22, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (1995) ‘The Endogeneity Between Language and Earnings: International Analyses’, Journal of Labor Economics, 13, 246–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (1996) ‘Ethnic Networks and Language Proficiency among Immigrants’, Journal of Population Economics, 9, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (1998) ‘English Language Fluency among Immigrants in the United States’, Research in Labor Economics, 17, 151–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2001) ‘A Model of Destination-Language Acquisition: Application to Male Immigrants in Canada’, Demography, 38, 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2002) ‘Immigrant Earnings: Language Skills, Linguistic Concentrations and the Business Cycle’, Journal of Population Economics, 15, 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2005) ‘Do Enclaves Matter in Immigrant Adjustment?’, City and Community, 4, 5–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2006) ‘Language Skills and Immigrant Adjustment: The Role of Immigration Policy’ In D. Cobb-Clark, R. Henderson and Siew-Ean Khar (eds) Public Policy and Immigrant Settlement (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 121–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2007) ‘Computer Usage, Destination Language Proficiency and the Earnings of Natives and Immigrants’, Review of the Economics of the Household, 5, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P.W. Miller (2008) ‘Why Is Payoff to Schooling Smaller for Immigrants?’, Labour Economics, 15, 1317–1340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and C. Houseworth (2011) ‘Ethnic Intermarriage among Immigrants: Human Capital and Assortative Mating’, Review of Economics of the Household, 9, 149–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. Chiswick and P. Miller (2014) ‘International Migration and the Economics of Language’ In B. Chiswick and P. Miller (eds) Handbook on the Economics of International Migration Volume 1A (Amsterdam: North-Holland), pp. 211–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • X. Clark, T. Hatton and J. Williamson (2007) ‘Explaining U.S. Immigration, 1971–1998’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 359–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Clarke and I. Isphording (2015) ‘Language Barriers in Immigrant Health Production’, IZA Discussion Paper 8846.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Clausen, E. Heinesen, H. Hummelgaard, L. Husted and M. Rosholm (2009) ‘The Effect of Integration Policies on the Time until Regular Employment of Newly Arrived Immigrants: Evidence from Denmark’, Labour Economics, 16, 409–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Cobb-Clark, M. Connolly and C. Worswick (2005) ‘Post-Migration Investments in Education and Job Search: A Family Perspective’, Journal of Population Economics, 18, 663–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Cohen-Goldner and Z. Eckstein (2008) ‘Labor Mobility of Immigrants: Training, Experience, Language and Opportunities’, International Economic Review, 49, 837–872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Cohen-Goldner and Z. Eckstein (2010) ‘Estimating the Return to Training and Occupational Experience: The Case of Female Immigrants’, Journal of Econometrics, 156, 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Damm (2009) ‘Ethnic Enclaves and Immigrant Labor Market Outcomes: Quasi-Experimental Evidence’, Journal of Labor Economics, 27, 281–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Dávila and M. Mora (2001) ‘The Marital Status of Recent Mexican Immigrants in the United States in 1980 and 1990’, International Migration Review, 35, 506–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Di Paolo and J.L. Raymond (2012) ‘Language Knowledge and Earnings in Catalonia’, Journal of Applied Economics, 15(1), 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Di Paolo and A. Tansel (2015) ‘Returns to Foreign Language Skills in a Developing Country: The Case of Turkey’, The Journal of Development Studies, 51, 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Dryer and M. Haspelmath (eds) (2013) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online (Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Duncan and S. Trejo (2007) ‘Ethnic Identification, Intermarriage, and Unmeasured Progress by Mexican Americans’ In G. Borjas (ed.) Mexican Immigration to the United States (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press) 229–267.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann (1993) ‘Earnings Adjustment of Temporary Migrants’, Journal of Population Economics, 6, 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann (1994) ‘Speaking Fluency, Writing Fluency and Earnings of Migrants’, Journal of Population Economics, 7, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann (1999) ‘Temporary Migration, Human Capital, and Language Fluency of Migrants’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 10, 297–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann and F. Fabbri (2003) ‘Language Proficiency and Labour Market Performance of Immigrants in the UK’, Economic Journal, 113, 695–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann and J. Gorlach (2015) ‘The Economics of Temporary Migrations’, Journal of Economic Literature, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann and A. van Soest (2001) ‘Language Fluency and Earnings: Estimation with Misclassified Language Indicators’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Dustmann and A. van Soest (2002) ‘Language and the Earnings of Immigrants’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Dyen, J. Kruskal and P. Black (1992) ‘An Indo-European Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment’, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 82, iii–iv, 1–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Edin, P. Fredriksson and O. Åslund (2003) ‘Ethnic Enclaves and the Economic Success of Immigrants: Evidence from a Natural Experiment’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 329–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Espenshade and H. Fu (1997) ‘An Analysis of English-language Proficiency among U.S. Immigrants’, American Sociological Review, 62, 288–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) ‘Special Eurobarometer on “Europeans and their languages”’, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_243_sum_en.pdf (accessed: 1 February 2012).

  • R. Fernandez and A. Fogli (2006) ‘Fertility: The Role of Culture and Family Experience’, Journal of the European Economic Association, 4, 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Funkhouser and F. Ramos (1993) ‘The Choice of Migration Destination: Dominican and Cuban Americans to the Mainland United States and Puerto Rico’, International Migration Review, 27, 537–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Georgiadis and A. Manning (2011) ‘Change and Continuity among Minority Communities in Britain’, Journal of Population Economics, 24, 541–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Ginsburgh and J. Prieto-Rodriguez (2011) ‘Returns to Foreign Languages of Native Workers in the EU’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64, 599–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C. Gorinas and M. Pytliková (2016) ‘Do Natives’ Attitudes Influence International Migration?’, International Migration Review, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Grogger and G. Hanson (2011) ‘Income Maximization and the Selection and Sorting of International Migrants’, Journal of Development Economics, 95, 42–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Grogger and S. Trejo (2002) ‘Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of California’s Mexican-Origin Population’, Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Heinesen, L. Husted and M. Rosholm (2013) ‘The Effects of Active Labour Market Policies for Immigrants Receiving Social Assistance in Denmark’, IZA Journal of Migration, doi:10.1186/2193-9039-2-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Hong and S. Page (2004) ‘Groups of Diverse Problem Solvers Can Outperform Groups of High-Ability Problem Solvers’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16385–16389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Hou (2005) ‘The Initial Destinations and Redistribution of Canada’s Major Immigrant Groups: Changes over the Past Two Decades’, Statistics Canada Research, Catalogue No. 11F0019MIE-No. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Isphording (2013) ‘Returns to Local and Foreign Language Skills’, Labour, 27, 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Isphording (2014) ‘Disadvantages of Linguistic Origin: Evidence from Immigrant Literacy Scores’, Economics Letters, 123, 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Isphording and S. Otten (2013) ‘The Costs of Babylon: Linguistic Distance in Applied Economics’, Review of International Economics, 21, 354–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Isphording and S. Otten (2014) ‘Linguistic Barriers in the Destination Language Acquisition of Immigrants’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 105, 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kahanec, M. Pytliková and K. Zimmermann (2016) ‘The Free Movement of Workers in an Enlarged European Union: Institutional Underpinnings of Economic Adjustment’ (forthcoming) In M. Kahanec and K. Zimmermann (eds) Labor Migration, EU Enlargement, and the Great Recession (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), ISBN 978-3-662-45320-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kahn (1988) ‘Immigrant Selectivity and Fertility Adaptation in the United States’, Social Forces, 67, 108–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Kerr and W. Lincoln (2010) ‘The Supply Side of Innovations: H-1B Visa Reforms and U.S. Ethnic Invention’, Journal of Labor Economics, 28, 473–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Keuntae and J. Cohen (2010) ‘Determinants of International Migration Flows to and from Industrialized Countries: A Panel Data Approach Beyond Gravity’, International Migration Review, 44, 899–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Kossoudji (1988) ‘The Impact of English Language Ability on the Labor Market Opportunities of Asian and Hispanic Immigrant Men’, Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Lang and E. Siniver (2009) ‘The Return to English in a Non-English Speaking Country: Russian Immigrants and Native Israelis in Israel’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1), 1935–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Lazear (1999) ‘Globalisation and the Market for Team-Mates’, The Economic Journal, 109, 15–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. P. Lazear (2007) ‘Mexican assimilation in the United States’ In G. J. Borjas (ed.) Mexican Immigration to the United States (Chicago: University Press/NBER Cambridge, MA), pp. 107–122.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • A. Leon (2003) ‘Does Ethnic Capital Matter? Identifying Peer Effects in the Inter-generational Transmission of Ethnic Differentials’, MIT Department of Economics, Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Leslie and J. Lindley (2001) ‘The Impact of Language Ability on Employment and Earnings of Britain’s Ethnic Communities’, Economica, 68, 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • V. Levenshtein (1966) ‘Binary Codes Capable of Correcting Deletions, Insertions, and Reversals’, Cybernetics and Control Theory, 10, 707–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Levinsohn (2007) ‘Globalization and the Returns to Speaking English in South Africa’ In A. Harrison (ed.) Globalization and Poverty (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 629–646.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J. Lindley (2002) ‘The English Language Fluency and Earnings of Ethnic Minorities in Britain’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 49, 467–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Massey and K. Espinosa (1997) ‘What’s Driving Mexico U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology, 102, 939–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Mayberry, E. Lock and H. Kazmi (2001) ‘Linguistic Ability and Early Language Exposure’, Nature, 417, 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Mayda (2010) ‘International Migration: A Panel Data Analysis of the Determinants of Bilateral Flows’, Journal of Population Economics, 23, 1249–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. McDonald (2004) ‘Toronto and Vancouver Bound: The Location Choice of New Canadian Immigrants’, Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 13, 85–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. McKenzie and H. Rapoport (2010) ‘Self-selection Patterns in Mexico-U.S. Migration: The Role of Migration Networks’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 811–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Melitz and F. Toubal (2014) ‘Native Language, Spoken Language, Translation and Trade’, Journal of International Economics, 93, 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • X. Meng and R. Gregory (2005) ‘Intermarriage and the Economic Assimilation of Immigrants’, Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Miranda and Y. Zhu (2013) ‘English Deficiency and the Native-Immigrant Wage Gap’, Economics Letters, 118, 38–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Munshi (2003) ‘Networks in the Modern Economy: Mexican Migrants in the US Labor Market’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 549–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Ortega and G. Peri (2009) ‘The Causes and Effects of International Migrations: Evidence from OECD Countries 1980–2005’, NBER Working Paper 14833.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • F. Ortega and G. Peri (2013) ‘The Effect of Income and Immigration Policies on International Migrations’, Migration Studies, 1, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Ortega and G. Peri (2015) ‘Migration, Trade and Income’, Journal of International Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Osborne (2000) ‘The Deceptively Simple Economics of Workplace Diversity’, Journal of Labor Research, 21, 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Palmer and M. Pytliková (2015) ‘Labor Market Laws and Intra-European Migration: The Role of the State in Shaping Destination Choices’, European Journal of Population, 31, 127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Parrotta, D. Pozzoli and M. Pytliková (2014a) ‘Does Labour Diversity Affect Firm Productivity?’, European Economic Review, 66, 144–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Parrotta, D. Pozzoli and M. Pytliková (2014b) ‘The Nexus Between Labor Diversity and Firm’s Innovation’, Journal of Population Economics, 27, 303–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Pedersen, M. Pytliková and N. Smith (2006) ‘Migration into OECD Countries, 1990–2000’ In C. Parsons and T. Smeeding (eds) Immigration and the Transformation of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 43–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • P. Pedersen, M. Pytliková and N. Smith (2008) ‘Selection and Network Effects: Migration Flows into OECD Countries, 1990–2000’, European Economic Review, 52, 1160–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Portes and L. Jensen (1989) ‘The Enclave and the Entrants: Patterns of Ethnic Enterprise in Miami before and after Mariel’, American Sociological Review, 54, 929–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Rooth and J. Saarela (2007) ‘Native Language and Immigrant Labour Market Outcomes: An Alternative Approach to Measuring the Returns to Language Skills’, Journal of International Migration and Integration, 8, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman B. Ryder (1973) ‘A Critique of the National Fertility Study’, Demography 10, 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Saiz and E. Zoido (2005) ‘Listening to What the World Says: Bilingualism and Earnings in the United States’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 523–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Sarvimäki and K. Hämäläinen (2015) ‘Integrating Immigrants: The Impact of Restructuring ALMP’, Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Schaafsma and A. Sweetman (2001) ‘Immigrant Earnings: Age at Immigration Matters’ Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 1066–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Shields and S. Wheatley Price (2002) ‘The English Language Fluency and Occupational Success of Ethnic Minority Immigrant Men Living in English Metropolitan Areas’, Journal of Population Economics, 15, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. M. Sorenson (1988) ‘The Fertility and Language Characteristics of Mexican-American and Non-Hispanic Husbands and Wives’, The Sociological Quarterly, 29, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Stevens (1992) ‘The Social and Demographic Context of Language Use in the United States’, American Sociological Review, 57, 171–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Stevens (1999) ‘Age at Immigration and Second Language Proficiency among Foreign-Born Adults: Age at Immigration and Second Language Proficiency among Foreign-Born Adults’, Language in Society, 28, 555–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Stevens and G. Swicegood (1987) ‘The Linguistic Context of Ethnic Endogamy-Born Adults: Age at Immigration and Second Language Proficiency among Foreign-Born Adults’, American Sociological Association, 2, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Stöhr (2015) ‘The Returns to Occupational Foreign Language Use: Evidence from Germany’, Labour Economics, 32, 86–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Swicegood, F. Bean, E. Herphey Stephen and W. Opitz (1988) ‘Language Usage and Fertility in the Mexican-Origin Population of the United States’, Demography, 25, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O. Toomet (2011) ‘Learn English, Not the Local Language! Ethnic Russians in the Baltic States’, American Economic Review, 101, 526–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Toussaint-Comeau and S. Rhine (2004) ‘Tenure Choice with Location Selection: The Case of Hispanic Neighborhoods in Chicago’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 22, 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. White and J. Glick (2009) Achieving Anew: How New Immigrants Do in American Schools, Jobs and Neighborhoods (New York: Russel Sage Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Williams (2011) ‘The Economic Returns to Multiple Language Usage in Western Europe’, International Journal of Manpower, 32, 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Y. Yao and J. van Ours (2015) ‘Language Skills and Labor Market Performance of Immigrants in the Netherlands’, Labour Economics, 34, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Alícia Adserà and Mariola Pytliková

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Adserà, A., Pytliková, M. (2016). Language and Migration. In: Ginsburgh, V., Weber, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Economics and Language. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32505-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics