Abstract
The political writings of Steven Pinker and Noam Chomsky differ in style, audience, and content. Pinker is a stylist; he wrote a book (2014) advising others how to write. Chomsky’s fact- and irony-rich works demand the reader’s critical participation; they do not try to persuade or charm. Pinker’s work is welcomed by the establishment; Chomsky’s criticism is ignored or rejected. Pinker’s writing expresses few qualms about the social hierarchies, differences in power, capacity to dominate and acquire, and unequal rewards of capitalist economic systems—systems that by their natures and in practice induce considerable disparities in income, power, and wealth. Chomsky is an egalitarian who holds that everyone should have an equal say in economic and political matters that affect them, even suggesting that an ideal system would accord equal reward to all (1981).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Bowles, S. & Herbert, G. (2011) A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1970, 1987) ‘Language and Freedom.’ Reprinted in James Peck, (ed.) The Chomsky Reader, New York: Pantheon.
Chomsky, N. (1981) Radical Priorities, (ed.) Otero, C. P. Montreal: Black Rose.
Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and Politics, (ed.) Otero, C. P. Montreal: Black Rose.
Chomsky, N. (1995) ‘Language and Nature’, Mind, 104, 1–61.
Chomsky, N. (1996) Powers and Prospects. Boston: South End Press.
Chomsky, N. (2006) Failed States. New York: Metropolitan.
Chomsky, N. (2009) Cartesian Linguistics (with new introduction by J. McGilvray). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. & McGilvray, J. (2012) The Science of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosmides, L. (1989) ‘The Logic of Social Exchange’, Cognition, 31, 187–276.
Tooby, J. (2005) ‘Neurocognitive Adaptations Designed for Social Exchange’, in Buss, D. (ed.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 584–627.
Descartes, R. (1637, 1984–1985) ‘Discourse on the Method’, trans. Cottingham, J. Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (trans. & eds.) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (2 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, R. B. (2013) ‘Pinker’s List: Exaggerating Prehistoric War Mortality’, in Fry, Douglas P. (ed.) War, Peace, and Human Nature: The Convergence of Evolutionary and Cultural Views. New York: Oxford, pp. 112–131.
Fodor, J. (1998a) Concepts. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. (1998b) ‘The Trouble with Psychological Darwinism’, London Review of Books, 20 (2), 11–13.
Fukuyama, F. (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York, Free Press.
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) ‘The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve,?’ Science, 298, 1569–1579.
Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1974) ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Lewontin, R. (1998) ‘The Evolution of Cognition: Questions We Will Never Answer’, in Scarborough, D. and Sternberg, S. (eds.) An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. 4. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marr, D. (1982, 2010) Vision. New York: Freeman and Co. (1982 edition). Cambridge: MIT Press (2010 edition).
McGilvray, J. (2013) Chomsky: Language, Mind, and Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
Osborn, R. (2009) ‘Noam Chomsky and the Realist Tradition’, Review of International Studies, 35 (2), 351–370.
Pinker, S. (2002) The Blank Slate. New York: Penguin.
Pinker, S. (2005) ‘So How Does the Mind Work?’, Mind and Language, 20, 1–24.
Pinker, S. (2011) The Better Angels of Our Nature. New York: Penguin.
Pinker, S. (2014) The Sense of Style. New York: Viking/Penguin.
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. (1990) ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (4), 707–784.
Singer, P. (2011) The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution, and Moral Progress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, E. O. (1998) Consilience. New York: Random House.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 James McGilvray
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McGilvray, J. (2015). Chomsky versus Pinker on Human Nature and Politics. In: Edgley, A. (eds) Noam Chomsky. Critical Explorations in Contemporary Political Thought. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32021-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-32021-6_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-56778-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-32021-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)