‘Anyway Let’s Have Peace:’ Women’s Expressions of Opinion on Appeasement

  • Julie V. Gottlieb


From across the political spectrum the agents of civil society were keen to speak for British womanhood, some with good intentions to voice their sex-based concerns, others to mock women’s alleged collective pusillanimity as part of a satirical subversion of the National Government’s foreign policy. Were these caricatures fair representations of British women’s opinion and their reactions to the Munich Crisis? How can we hope to access women’s intimate feelings as they faced another war? The thoughts and deeds of the more prominent ‘Guilty’ or ‘Innocent’ women are accessible to historians through their published material, in media coverage, and in carefully archived private papers. Those of the British ‘woman on the street,’ are less readily apparent. However, we are fortunate that two rich archives, Mass-Observation (M-O) and the so-called Crisis Letters which form part of the Neville Chamberlain papers contain women’s confessional sources, and individualized qualitative material that complements but also fine tunes the quantitative finding of the social researchers.1


Public Opinion Prime Minister Foreign Policy Foreign Affair Letter Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See Murray Goot, “Mass-Observation and Modern Public Opinion Research,” in Wolfgang Donsbach and Michael Traugott (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research (London, 2008), pp. 93–103, for a comparative study of the ethos, methods, and definition of ‘public opinion’ of Gallup and Mass-Observation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Annebella Pollen, “Research Methodology in Mass Observation Past and Present,” History Workshop Journal, 75(1), Spring, 2013, pp. 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    James Hinton, Nine Wartime Lives: Mass Observation and the Making of the Modern Self (Oxford, 2010), p. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Robert Graves and Alan Hodge, The Long Weekend: The Living Story of the Twenties and Thirties (London, 1940), p. 397.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tony Kushner, We Europeans? Mass-Observation, ‘Race’ and British Identity in the Twentieth Century (Farnham, 2005), p. 23.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    For studies of wartime women that rely heavily on Mass-Observation material, see Lucy Noakes, War and the British: Gender and National Identity, 1939–1991 (London, 1998);Google Scholar
  7. Sonya Rose, ‘Sex, Citizenship, and the Nation in World War II Britain,’ American Historical Review, 103(4), October, 1998, pp. 1147–1176;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Penny Summerfield, Women Workers in the Second World War: Production and Patriarchy in Conflict (London, 1984);Google Scholar
  9. Penny Summerfield, Reconstructing Women’s Wartime Lives: Discourse and Subjectivity in Oral Histories of the Second World War (Manchester, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Charles Madge and Tom Harrisson, Britain by Mass-Observation (Harmsworth, 1939)Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    James Hinton, The Mass-Observers: A History, 1937–1949 (Oxford, 2013), p. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 13.
    Dorothy Sheridan (ed.), Wartime Women: A Mass-Observation Anthology (London, 2000), p. 4.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Robert Malcolmson (ed.), Love & War in London: The Mass Observation Diary of Olivia Cockett (London, 2009), p. 12.Google Scholar
  14. 19.
    Winifred F. Peck, “Hospitality: Christmas Cards and the Crisis,” Manchester Guardian, 15 November, 1938.Google Scholar
  15. 20.
    See Dorothy Sheridan (ed.), Among you Taking Notes… The Wartime Diary of Naomi Mitchison 1939–1945 (London, 2000).Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Anne Olivier Bell (ed.), The Diary of Virginia Woolf, Vol. Five 1936–1941 (San Diego, 1984), p. 142.Google Scholar
  17. 29.
    On women as wartime subversives see Antonia Lant, Blackout: Reinventing Women for Wartime British Cinema (Princeton, 1991), Chapter 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 36.
    Richard Overy, The Morbid Age: Britain and the Crisis of Civilization, 1919–1939 (London, 2010), p. 347.Google Scholar
  19. 39.
    Tom Harrisson, “What is Public Opinion?” The Political Quarterly, 11(4) October, 1940, pp. 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 40.
    Norman Rose, “The Resignation of Anthony Eden,” Historical Journal, 25(4), 1982, pp. 911–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 42.
    Martin Pugh, Women and the Women’s Movement in Britain (Basingstoke, 2000), p. 107.Google Scholar
  22. 46.
    Martin Francis, “Tears, Tantrums, and Bared Teeth: The Emotional Economy of Three Conservative Prime Ministers, 1951–1963,” Journal of British Studies, 41(3), July 2002, pp. 354–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 47.
    Robert Self, Neville Chamberlain: A Biography (Aldershot, 2006), p. 328.Google Scholar
  24. 49.
    Neville Chamberlain, In Search of Peace: Speeches, 1937–1938 (London, 1939), pp. 274–276.Google Scholar
  25. 61.
    Virginia Cowles, Looking for Trouble (London, 1941), p. 192.Google Scholar
  26. 62.
    See Jill Liddington, The Road to Greenham Common: Feminism and Anti-Militarism in Britain Since 1820 (Syracuse, 1989).Google Scholar
  27. 77.
    Frank Mort, “Love in a Cold Climate: Letters, Public Opinion and Monarchy in the 1936 Abdication Crisis,” Twentieth Century British History 25(1), 2014, pp. 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 95.
    Frank Mort, “Love in a Cold Climate: Letters, Public Opinion and Monarchy in the 1936 Abdication Crisis,” Twentieth Century British History 25(1), 2014, pp. 30–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Julie V. Gottlieb 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie V. Gottlieb
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations