Advertisement

Socio-Legal Studies and the Cultural Practice of Lawyering

  • Hilary Sommerlad
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

There are several strands to the debate over the relationship between law and the social, and the function and value of social scientific understandings of law. Legal realists emphasized the contribution social science could make to the law, legal practice and government administration (Summers, 1988), and policy-oriented, empirical work remains a significant component of socio-legal studies (Genn et al., 2006). Others stress the challenge social theory has posed to law’s ‘technocratic straitjacket’ (Thornton, 2006; 2007; Heydebrand, 1979) and its claimed coherence (Lacey, 1998, e.g. pp. 10¨C11). However, the socio-legal studies project has also been described as incoherent (Friedman, 1986, p. 779), lacking a theoretical underpinning (Hunt, 1981). For Fitzpatrick, its premises ‘are fundamentally unexamined’ and, refuting the general socio-legal presumption that law shapes society, he argues that law ‘renders society possible’ (1995, p. 106). This conceptual confusion may be seen as encapsulated in the hyphen, which Lacey reads as an implicit acceptance of law’s claims ‘that… the social and the legal each constitutes a coherent and relatively discrete entity’ (1998, p. 221), and a significant strand of the debate is grounded in the closed and autonomous character of the legal universe. Here the focus is on law’s capacity to colonize social scientific ideas, transforming them into ‘hybrid artefacts’ (Teubner, 1989, p. 747),1 so that sociological interpretations are viewed as incapable of grasping ‘law’s own criteria of significance’ (Nelken, 1996, pp. 108–9).

Keywords

Judicial Review Legal Professionalism Legal Practice Relative Autonomy Sociological Interpretation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abel, R (2003) English Lawyers between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  2. Arthurs, H W and R Kreklewich (1996) ‘Law, Legal Institutions and the Legal Profession in the New Economy’ 34 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 1–60Google Scholar
  3. Banakar, R (2005) Studying Cases Empirically (Oxford: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
  4. Banakar, R (2011) ‘The Sociology of Law: From Industrialisation to Globalisation’ http://ssrn.com/abstract=1761466
  5. Bartlett, F and R Mortensen (2009) ‘Integrity in Legal Practice: A Report from the Third International Legal Ethics Conference, Gold Coast, Australia’ 12(1) Legal Ethics 100–6Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (London: Sage)Google Scholar
  7. Blackstone, W (1809) Commentaries on the Laws of England vol. 1 (London: Cadell and Davies)Google Scholar
  8. Bondy, V and M Sunkin (2008) ‘Accessing Judicial Review’ Public Law 647–67Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P (1987) ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’ 38 Hastings Law Journal 814–53Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P (1990) The Logic of Practice (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press)Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P (1996) The Rules of Art (Cambridge: Polity Press)Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P and L Wacquant (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago IL: Chicago University Press)Google Scholar
  13. Broekman, J (1989) ‘Revolution and Commitment to a Legal System’ in N MacCormick and Z Bankowski (eds), Enlightenment, Rights and Revolution: Essays in Legal and Social Philosophy (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press), pp. 315–36Google Scholar
  14. Cain, M (1994) ‘The Symbol Traders’ in M Cain and C Harrington (eds), Lawyers in a Postmodern World (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. 15–48Google Scholar
  15. Cotterrell, R (1998) ‘Why Must Legal Ideas Be Interpreted Sociologically?’ 25(2) Journal of Law and Society 171–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cotterrell, R (2009) ‘Spectres of Transnationalism: Changing Terrains of Sociology of Law’ 36(4) Journal of Law and Society 481–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damaska, M (1986) The Faces of Justice and State Authority (New Haven CT: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
  18. de Sousa Santos, B (1991) ‘Una cartografía simbólica de las representaciones sociales‘ 116 Nueva Socieda 18–38Google Scholar
  19. de Sousa Santos, B (2002) Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  20. Dezalay, Y (1994) ‘The Forum Should Fit the Fuss: The Economics and Politics of Negotiated Justice’ in M Cain and C Harrington (eds), Lawyers in a Postmodern World (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. 124–54Google Scholar
  21. Durkheim, E (1957) Professional Ethics and Civic Morals (London: Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durkheim, E (1964) The Division of Labour in Society (London: Routledge)Google Scholar
  23. Ehrlich, E (1936) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  24. Engel, D (1993) ‘Law in the Domains of Everyday Life: The Construction of Community and Difference’ in A Sarat and T Kearns (eds), Law in Everyday Life (Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 123–70Google Scholar
  25. Entwistle, J (2001) ‘The Dressed Body’ in J Entwistle and E Wilson (eds), Body Dressing (Oxford: Berg), pp. 35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fine, B (2002) ‘Marxism and the Social Theory of Law’ in R Banakar and M Travers (eds), An Introduction to Law and Social Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing), pp. 101–17Google Scholar
  27. Fitzpatrick, P (1995) ‘Being Social in Socio-Legal Studies’ 22 Journal of Law and Society 105–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fournier, V (1999) ‘The Appeal to “professionalism” as a Disciplinary Mechanism’ 47 Sociological Review 280–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Freidson, E (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic (Cambridge: Polity Press)Google Scholar
  30. Friedman, L (1986) ‘The Law and Society Movement’ 38 Stanford Law Review 763–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Genn, H (2009) Judging Civil Justice (Hamlyn Lectures) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Genn, H, M Partington and S Wheeler (2006) Law in the Real World: Improving our Understanding of how Law Works: Final Report and Recommendations (London: UCL)Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City NY: Doubleday)Google Scholar
  34. Goodrich, P (1993) ‘Gynaetopia: Feminine Genealogies of the Common Law’ 20(3) Journal of Law and Society 256–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodrich, P (2009) ‘Intellection and Indiscipline’ 36(4) Journal of Law and Society 460–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goodrich, P and Y Hachamovitch (1991) ‘Time Out of Mind: An Introduction to the Semiotics of the Common Law’ in P Fitzpatrick (ed.), Dangerous Supplements: Resistance and Renewal in Jurisprudence (London: Pluto Press), pp. 159–81Google Scholar
  37. Habermas, J (1996) Between Facts and Norms (Cambridge: Polity Press)Google Scholar
  38. Hacker, D (2008) ‘A Legal Field in Action: The Case of Divorce Arrangements in Israel’ 4(11) International Journal of Law in Context 1–33Google Scholar
  39. Halliday, T and L Karpik (1997) Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar
  40. Hansen, O (1992) ‘A Future for Legal Aid?’ 19 Journal of Law and Society 85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrison, B (1978) Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain (London: Croom Helm)Google Scholar
  42. Heydebrand, W (1979) ‘The Technocratic Administration of Justice’ 2 Research in Law and Sociology 29–64Google Scholar
  43. Hillyard, P (2007) ‘Law’s Empire: Socio-legal Empirical Research in the Twenty-First Century’ 34(2) Journal of Law and Society 266–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hindess, B (2008) ‘Political Theory and “Actually Existing Liberalism”’ 3 Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 347–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hughes, E (1963) ‘Professions’ Daedalus (Fall) 655–68Google Scholar
  46. Hunt, A (1981) ‘Dichotomy and Contradiction in the Sociology of Law’ 8 Journal of Law and Society 47–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hunter, R, C McGlynn and E Rackley (eds) (2010) Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
  48. Hutchinson, A (1998) ‘Legal Ethics for a Fragmented Society’ 5 International Journal of the Legal Profession 175–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson, T (1972) Professions and Power (London: Macmillan)Google Scholar
  50. Johnson, T (1995) ‘Governmentality and the Institutionalization of Expertise’ in T Johnson and E Krause (1999) Death of the Guilds: Professions, State and the Advance of Capitalism 1930 to the Present (New Haven CT: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
  51. Krause, E (1999) Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present (New Haven CT: Yale University Press)Google Scholar
  52. Lacey, N (1998) Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory (Oxford: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
  53. Larson, M (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis (London: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  54. Levinson, S (1993) ‘Identifying the Jewish Lawyer: Reflections on the Construction of a Professional Identity’ 14 Cardozo Law Review 1577–613Google Scholar
  55. Lind, E and T Tyler (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (New York: Plenum Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Luhmann, N (1988) ‘Closure and Openness: On Reality in the World of Law’ in G Teubner (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 335–48Google Scholar
  57. Marshall, T H (1950) Citizenship and Social Class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  58. McCallum, D (2011) ‘Liberal Forms of Governing Australian Indigenous Peoples’ 38(4) Journal of Law and Society 604–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McNay, L (2000) Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory (Cambridge: Polity)Google Scholar
  60. Mortensen, R (2009) ‘The Lawyer as Parent: Sympathy, Care and Character in Lawyers’ Ethics’ 12(1) Legal Ethics 1–34Google Scholar
  61. Naffine, N (2003) ‘Who Are Law’s Persons? From Cheshire Cats to Responsible Subjects’ 66(3) Modern Law Review 346–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nelken, D (1996) ‘Can There Be a Sociology of Legal Meaning?’ in D Nelken (ed.), Law as Communication (Aldershot: Dartmouth), pp. 107–29Google Scholar
  63. Oakes, G (2003) ‘Max Weber on Value Rationality and Value Spheres’ 3(1) Journal of Classical Sociology 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pleasence, P, A Buck, N J Balmer, A O’Grady, H Genn and M Smith (2004) Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice (London: The Stationery Office)Google Scholar
  65. Power, M (1997) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  66. Pue, W (1998) ‘Editorial: Lawyering for a Fragmented World: Professionalism after God’ 5(2–3) International Journal of the Legal Profession 125–40Google Scholar
  67. Rackley, E (2009) ‘Detailing Judicial Difference’ 17 Feminist Legal Studies 11–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rose, N (1996) ‘Assembling the Modern Self’ in R Porter (ed.), The History of the Self (London: Routledge), pp. 224–48Google Scholar
  69. Samuel, G (2009) ‘Interdisciplinarity and the Authority Paradigm: Should Law be Taken Seriously by Scientists and Social Scientists?’ 36(4) Journal of Law and Society 431–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sanderson, P and H Sommerlad (2011) ‘Colonising Law for the Poor: Access to Justice in the New Regulatory State’ in V Bryson and P Fisher (eds), Redefining Social Justice: New Labour Rhetoric and Reality (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 178–200Google Scholar
  71. Sarat, A and W Felstiner (1995) Divorce Lawyers and their Clients (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  72. Sarat, A and S Scheingold (1998) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  73. Sarat, A and S S Silbey (1988) ‘The Pull of the Policy Audience’ 10 Law and Policy 97–166Google Scholar
  74. Saussure, F (1972) Course in General Linguistics (London: Duckworth)Google Scholar
  75. Selznick, P (1992) The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community (Berkeley and Los Angeles CA: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  76. Shamir, R (1995) Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal (Durham NC: Duke University Press)Google Scholar
  77. Silbey, S S (1985) ‘Ideas and Practices in the Study of Law’ 9(1) Legal Studies Forum 7–28Google Scholar
  78. Smart, C (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith, R (1997) Justice: Redressing the Balance (London: Legal Action Group)Google Scholar
  80. Sommerlad, H (1995) ‘Managerialism and the Legal Professional: A New Professional Paradigm’ 2(2/3) International Journal of the Legal Profession 159–85Google Scholar
  81. Sommerlad, H (1999) ‘The Implementation of Quality Initiatives and New Public Management in the Legal Aid Sector in England and Wales: Bureaucratisation, Stratification and Surveillance’ 6 International Journal of the Legal Profession 311–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sommerlad, H (2001) ‘I’ve Lost the Plot: An Everyday Story of the “Political” Legal Aid Lawyer’ 28 Journal of Law and Society 335–60Google Scholar
  83. Sommerlad, H (2004) ‘Some Reflections on the Relationship between Citizenship, Access to Justice and the Reform of Legal Aid’ 31(3) Journal of Law and Society 345–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sommerlad, H (2011a) ‘The Commercialization of Law and the Enterprising Legal Practitioner: Continuity and Change’ 18(1–2) International Journal of the Legal Profession 73–108Google Scholar
  85. Sommerlad, H (2011b) ‘Legal Problems and the Responsibilisation of the Individual’, Meeting of the International Legal Aid Group, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  86. Sommerlad, H (2013) ‘Let History Judge? Gender, Race, Class and Performative Identity: A Study of Women Judges in England and Wales’ in U Schultz and G Shaw (eds), Gender and Judging (Oxford: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
  87. Sommerlad, H and P Sanderson (2009) Training and Regulating those Providers of Publicly Funded Legal Advice Services: A Case Study of Civil Provision (London: Ministry of Justice)Google Scholar
  88. Sommerlad, H and D Wall (1999) Legally Aided Clients and their Solicitor: Qualitative Perspectives on Quality and Legal Aid (London: Law Society)Google Scholar
  89. Sugarman, D (1996) ‘Bourgeois Collectivism, Professional Power and the Boundaries of the State: The Private and Public Life of the Law Society 1825 to 1914’ 3(1/2) International Journal of the Legal Profession 81–135Google Scholar
  90. Summers, R S (1988) Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  91. Sumner, C (1994) ‘Introduction’ in M Cain and C Harrington (eds), Lawyers in a Postmodern World (Buckingham: Open University Press), pp. x–xiiGoogle Scholar
  92. Teubner, G (1989) ‘How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law’ 33 Law and Society Review 727–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thompson, E P (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act (Harmondsworth: Penguin)Google Scholar
  94. Thornton, M (1996) Dissonance and Distrust: Women in the Legal Profession (Melbourne: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  95. Thornton, M (2006) ‘The Dissolution of the Social in the Legal Academy’ 25 Australian Feminist Law Journal 3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thornton, M (2007) ‘The Law School, the Market and the New Knowledge Economy’ 17 Legal Education Review 1–26Google Scholar
  97. Trubek, L and M Kransberger (1998) ‘Critical Lawyers: Social Justice and the Structures of Private Practice’ in A Sarat and S Scheingold (eds), Cause Lawyering and Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 201–20Google Scholar
  98. Unger, R M (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (New York: Free Press)Google Scholar
  99. Vick, D (2004) ‘Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law’ 31(2) Journal of Law and Society 163–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Weber, M (1948) ‘Religious Rejections of the World and their Directions’ in H Gerth and C Wright Mills (eds), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 323–59Google Scholar
  101. Weber, M (1949) ‘“Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy’ in E Shils and H Finch (eds and trans.), Max Weber: The Methodology of the Social Sciences (New York: Free Press), pp. 49–112Google Scholar
  102. Weber, M (1922/1978) Economy and Society (Berkeley CA: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  103. White, L (1990) ‘Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs G’ 38(1) Buffalo Law Review 1–58Google Scholar
  104. Wilensky, H L (1964) ‘The Professionalization of Everyone?’ 70 The American Journal of Sociology 137–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Witz, A (1992) Professions and Patriarchy (London: Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hilary Sommerlad 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilary Sommerlad

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations