Advertisement

De Lege Ferenda: What is the ‘Socio’ of Legal Reasoning?

  • Panu Minkkinen
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

In his seminal albeit controversial Sociological Justice, Donald Black made a strong plea for jurisprudence to ‘face reality’ and to endorse the social and political opportunities that the sociological study of law offered:

Sociological knowledge will surely grow, creeping throughout the world with a fatefulness unknowable. We only know that the science of society changes society. Social action increasingly becomes a self-conscious application of sociology. Sociological power is harnessed, a new form of energy generated, its uses impossible to imagine. A sociological society. (Black, 1989, p. 103)

In Black’s sociological vision, the ‘socio’ of the socio-legal refers to two interrelated things. Firstly, it is the society that jurisprudence as traditional legal reasoning has to face up to as its abandoned reality. Legal reasoning has allegedly decontextualized law from the society that it inherently belongs to, and sociology offers one way to redress this alienation. But secondly, socio would also stand for the science of the society of which law is a part. Unlike traditional legal reasoning, the science of a socially contextualized law has the power to transform its object of study, and so it includes within itself the potential of social reform. The socio is, then, an acknowledgment of both the society to which law belongs and the ability to change that society through appropriately contextualized science and knowledge. Black’s plea was at the same time a recognition of the growing significance of the law and society movement (Chambliss, 1982; Friedman, 1986) and, no doubt, also an accurate prediction of the future successes of its socio-legal sibling (Thomas, 1997; Wheeler and Thomas, 2000).

Keywords

Welfare State Legal Reasoning Legal Practice Civil Liability Substantive Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ancel, M (1965) Social Defence: A Modern Approach to Criminal Problems, J Wilson and M Ancel (trans.) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
  2. Aradau, C and R Van Munster (2007) ‘Governing Terrorism Through Risk: Taking Precautions, (un)Knowing the Future’ 13(1) European Journal of International Relations 89–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayres, I and J Braithwaite (1992) Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  4. Baker, T (2002) ‘Liability and Insurance after September 11: Embracing Risk Meets the Precautionary Principle’ 27(3) The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance 349–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beccaria, C (1986) On Crimes and Punishments [Dei delitti e delle pene 1763], D Young (trans.) (Indiana: Hackett)Google Scholar
  6. Beck, U (2006) ‘Living in the World Risk Society’ 35(3) Economy and Society 329–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Behrent, M C (2010) ‘Accidents Happen: François Ewald, the “Antirevolutionary” Foucault, and the Intellectual Politics of the French Welfare State’ 82(3) The Journal of Modern History 585–624Google Scholar
  8. Black, D (1989) Sociological Justice (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  9. Blankenburg, E (1984) ‘The Poverty of Evolutionism: A Critique of Teubner’s Case for “Reflexive Law” ’ 18(2) Law and Society Review 273–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carbonnier, J (1988) Flexible droit. Pour une sociologie du droit sans rigueur 6th edn (Paris: Libraire Générale de droit et de jurisprudence)Google Scholar
  11. Chambliss, W J (1982) Law, Order, and Power 2nd edn (Reading: Addison-Wesley)Google Scholar
  12. Dean, M (2010) Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society 2nd edn (Los Angeles and London: Sage)Google Scholar
  13. Donzelot, J (1991) ‘The Mobilization of Society’ in G Burchell, C Gordon and P Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 169–80Google Scholar
  14. Donzelot, J (1993) ‘The Promotion of the Social’ in G Gane and T Johnson (eds), Foucault’s New Domains (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 106–38Google Scholar
  15. Ehrlich, E (2002) Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law [Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts 1913], W L Moll (trans.) (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers)Google Scholar
  16. Ewald, F (1986a) L’État providence (Paris: Grasset)Google Scholar
  17. Ewald, F (1986b) ‘Pour un positivisme critique: Michel Foucault et la philosophie du droit’ 3 Droits 137–42Google Scholar
  18. Ewald, F (1986c) ‘Une expérience foucauldienne: les principes généraux du droit’ 471–2 Critique 788–93Google Scholar
  19. Ewald, F (1987a) ‘Justice, Equality, Judgement: On “Social Justice” ’ in G Teubner (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law (New York and Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 91–110Google Scholar
  20. Ewald, F (1987b) ‘Risk, Insurance, Society. An Interview with François Ewald’ 3 History of the Present 1–3 and 6–12Google Scholar
  21. Ewald, F (1988a) ‘A Concept of Social Law’ in G Teubner (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State (New York and Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 40–75Google Scholar
  22. Ewald, F (1988b) ‘The Law of Law’ in G Teubner (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society (New York and Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 36–50Google Scholar
  23. Ewald, F (1990) ‘Norms, Discipline, and the Law’ 30 Representations 138–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ewald, F (1991) ‘Insurance and Risk’ in G Burchell, C Gordon and P Miller (eds), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 197–210Google Scholar
  25. Ewald, F (1993) ‘Two Infinities of Risk’ in B Massumi (ed.), The Politics of Everyday Fear (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 221–8Google Scholar
  26. Ewald, F (1996) Histoire de l’État providence. Les origines de la solidarité (Paris: Grasset)Google Scholar
  27. Ewald, F (1999a) ‘Foucault and the Contemporary Scene’ 25(3) Philosophy and Social Criticism 81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ewald, F (1999b) ‘Risk in Contemporary Society’ 6(2) Connecticut Insurance Law Journal 365–79Google Scholar
  29. Ewald, F (2002) ‘The Return of Descarte’s Malicious Demon: An Outline of a Philosophy of Precaution’ in T Baker and J Simon (eds), Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press), pp. 273–300Google Scholar
  30. Feeley, M M and J Simon (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications’ 30(4) Criminology 449–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. von Feuerbach, P J A (2007) ‘The Foundations of Criminal Law and the Nullum Crimen Principle’ 5(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1005–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foucault, M (1988) ‘The Dangerous Individual’ in M Foucault, Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984 (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 125–51Google Scholar
  33. Foucault, M (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 2nd edn, A Sheridan (trans.) (New York: Vintage)Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M (2001) ‘Questions of Method’ in M Foucault, Power: The Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984 vol. 3 (New York: The New Press), pp. 223–39Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M (2003a) Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974, G Burchell (trans.) (New York: Picador)Google Scholar
  36. Foucault, M (2003b) Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, D Macey (trans.) (London et al: Penguin)Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, M (2004a) Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975, G Burchell (trans.) (New York: Picador)Google Scholar
  38. Foucault, M (2004b) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences (trans. s.n.) (London and New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
  39. Foucault, M (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979, G Burchell (trans.) (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar
  40. Friedman, L M (1986) ‘The Law and Society Movement’ 38(3) Stanford Law Review 763–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fuller, L L (1958) ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart’ 71(4) Harvard Law Review 630–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Garland, D (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  43. Garland, D (2003) ‘The Rise of Risk’ in R V Ericson and A Doyle (eds), Risk and Morality (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), pp. 46–86Google Scholar
  44. Genn, H, M Partington and S Wheeler (2006) Law in the Real World: Improving Our Understanding of How Law Works. The Nuffield Inquiry on Empirical Legal Research: Final Report and Recommendations (London: Nuffield Foundation)Google Scholar
  45. Golder, B and P Fitzpatrick (2009) Foucault’s Law (Abingdon and New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
  46. Haldemann, F (2005) ‘Gustav Radbruch vs. Hans Kelsen: A Debate on Nazi Law’ 18(2) Ratio Juris 162–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hart, H L A (1961/1997) The Concept of Law 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  48. Hebenton, B and T Seddon (2009) ‘From Dangerousness to Precaution: Managing Sexual and Violent Offenders in an Insecure and Uncertain Age’ 49(3) British Journal of Criminology 343–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hillyard, P (2002) ‘Invoking Indignation: Reflections on Future Directions of Socio-Legal Studies’ 29(4) Journal of Law and Society 645–56Google Scholar
  50. Hillyard, P (2007) ‘Law’s Empire: Socio-Legal Empirical Research in the Twenty-First Century’ 34(2) Journal of Law and Society 266–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. von Hirsch, A (1986) Past or Future Crimes: Deservedness and Dangerousness in the Sentencing of Criminals (Manchester: Manchester University Press)Google Scholar
  52. Joyce, P (2001) ‘Governmentality and Risk: Setting Priorities in the New NHS’ 23(5) Sociology of Health and Illness 594–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kelsen, H (1971) ‘What is Justice?’ in H Kelsen, What Is Justice? Justice, Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science: Collected essays by Hans Kelsen (Berkeley and London: University of California Press), pp. 1–24Google Scholar
  54. King, M and C Thornhill (2003) Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. King, M and C Thornhill (eds) (2006) Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing)Google Scholar
  56. Lengwiler, M (2009) ‘Double Standards: The History of Standardizing Humans in Modern Life Insurance’ in S L Star and M Lampland (eds), Standards and their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life (Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 95–113Google Scholar
  57. von Liszt, F (1905) ‘Der Zweckgedanke im Strafrecht (Marbuger Universitätsprogramm 1882)’ in F von Liszt, Strafrechtliche Aufsätze und Vorträge (Berlin: J Guttentag), pp. 126–79Google Scholar
  58. von Liszt, F (2007) ‘The Rationale for the Nullum Crimen Principle’ 5(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice 1009–13Google Scholar
  59. Luhmann, N (1985) A Sociological Theory of Law, E King and M Albrow (trans.) (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
  60. Minkkinen, P (1997) ‘The Juridical Matrix’ 6(3) Social and Legal Studies 425–43Google Scholar
  61. Minkkinen, P (2009) Sovereignty, Knowledge, Law (Abingdon and New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
  62. Nonet, P and P Selznick (2001) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law 2nd edn (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers)Google Scholar
  63. O’Neill, J (1986) ‘The Disciplinary Society: From Weber to Foucault’ 37(1) British Journal of Sociology 42–60Google Scholar
  64. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A (2009) Niklas Luhmann: Law, Society, Justice (Abingdon and New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
  65. Pound, R (1910) ‘Law in Books and Law in Action’ 44(1) American Law Review 12–36Google Scholar
  66. Prins, A (1910) La défense sociale et les transformations du droit pénal (Bruxelles and Leipzig: Misch and Thron)Google Scholar
  67. Rose, R (2001) ‘The Politics of Life Itself’ 18(6) Theory, Culture and Society 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shapiro, S J (2006) ‘What Is the Internal Point of View?’ 75(3) Fordham Law Review 1157–70Google Scholar
  69. Sharpe, A N (2010) Foucault’s Monsters and the Challenge of Law (Abingdon and New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
  70. Simon, J (1988) ‘The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices’ 22(4) Law and Society Review 771–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Simon, J (1992) ‘“In Another Kind of Wood”: Michel Foucault and Sociolegal Studies’ 17(1) Law and Social Inquiry 49–55Google Scholar
  72. Tamanaha, B Z (2001) A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teubner, G (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’ 17(2) Law and Society Review 239–86Google Scholar
  74. Teubner, G (1987) ‘Juridification–Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’ in G Teubner (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres: A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law (New York and Berlin: de Gruyter)Google Scholar
  75. Teubner, G (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System, A Bankowska and R Adler (trans.) (Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell)Google Scholar
  76. Thomas, P A (ed.) (1997) Socio-Legal Studies (Aldershot: Dartmouth)Google Scholar
  77. Twining, W (1997) Law in Context: Enlarging a Discipline (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Unger, R M (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory (New York and London: The Free Press)Google Scholar
  79. Unger, R M (1983) ‘The Critical Legal Studies Movement’ 96(3) Harvard Law Review 561–675Google Scholar
  80. Virally, M (1990) ‘À propos de la “lex ferenda”’ in M Virally, Le droit interna-tional en devenir: essais écrits au fil des ans (Paris: PUF), pp. 213–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber, M (1977) Critique of Stammler [R Stammler, ‘Überwindung’ der materi-alistischen Geschichtsauffassung, 1907], G Oakes (trans.) (New York: The Free Press)Google Scholar
  82. Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 1920–21], vols 1 and 2, E Fischoff et al. (trans.) (Berkeley and London: University of California Press)Google Scholar
  83. West, R (2003) Re-Imagining Justice: Progressive Interpretations of Formal Equality, Rights, and the Rule of Law (Aldershot: Ashgate)Google Scholar
  84. Wheeler, S and P A Thomas (2000) ‘Socio-Legal Studies’ in D Hayton (ed.), Law’s Future(s) (Oxford: Hart Publishing), pp. 267–79Google Scholar
  85. Wilhelmsson, T (1992) Critical Studies in Private Law: A Treatise on Need-Rational Principles in Modern Law (Dordrecht: Kluwer)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Panu Minkkinen 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panu Minkkinen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations