Frege or Dedekind? Towards a Reevaluation of Their Legacies

  • Erich H. Reck
Part of the History of Analytic Philosophy book series (History of Analytic Philosophy)


The philosophy of mathematics has long been an important part of philosophy in the analytic tradition, ever since the pioneering works of Frege and Russell. Richard Dedekind was roughly Frege’s contemporary and his contributions to the foundations of mathematics are widely acknowledged as well. The philosophical aspects of those contributions have been received more critically however. In the present chapter, Dedekind’s philosophical reception is reconsidered. At the chapter’s core lies a comparison of Frege’s and Dedekind’s legacies, within and outside of analytic philosophy. While the comparison proceeds historically, it is shaped by current philosophical concerns, especially by debates about neo-logicist and neo-structuralist views. In fact, philosophical and historical considerations are intertwined thoroughly, to the benefit of both. The underlying motivation is to rehabilitate Dedekind as a major philosopher of mathematics, in relation, but not necessarily in opposition, to Frege.


Analytic Philosophy Free Creation Philosophical Remark Frege Arithmetic Finite Cardinal Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antonelli, Aldo (2010): ‘The Nature and Meaning of Numbers’, The Journal of Philosophy 62, 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avigad, Jeremy (2006): ‘Methodology and Metaphysics in the Development of Dedekind’s Theory of Ideals’, in Ferreirós & Gray (2006), pp. 159–186.Google Scholar
  3. Awodey, S. & Reck, E. (2002): ‘Completeness and Categoricity, Part I:19th-century Axiomatics to 20th-century Metalogic’, History and Philosophy of Logic 23, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benacerraf, Paul (1965): ‘What Numbers Could Not Be’, Philosophical Review 74; reprinted in Benacerraf & Putnam (1983), pp. 272–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benacerraf, P. & Putnam, H., eds (1964/1983): Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, 1st ed., Prentice Hall, 1964; 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  6. Boolos, George (1998): Logic, Logic, and Logic, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burgess, John (2005): Fixing Frege, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carnap, Rudolf (1931): ‘The Logical Foundations of Mathematics’, Erkenntnis, 91–102; reprinted in Benacerraf & Putnam (1964), pp. 41–52.Google Scholar
  9. —— (1949): Meaning and Necessity, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cassirer, Ernst (1907): ‘Kant und die moderne Mathematik’, Kant-Studien 12, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. —— (1910): Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff, Bruno Cassirer: Berlin; English trans., by Swabey and Swabey, in Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of Relativity, Open Court: Chicago, 1923.Google Scholar
  12. Cook, Roy, ed., (2007): The Arché Papers on the Mathematics of Abstraction, Springer: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Corry, Leo (2004): Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures, 2nd ed., Birkhäuser: Basel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dedekind, Richard (1872): Stetigkeit und irrationale Zahlen; reprinted in Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, Vol. 3, R. Fricke, ed., Vieweg, 1932, pp. 335–391; English trans., ‘Continuity and irrational Numbers’, in Dedekind (1963), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  15. —— (1888): Was sind undwas sollen die Zahlen?; reprinted in Gesammelte Mathematische Werke, Vol. 3, R. Fricke, ed., Vieweg, 1932, pp. 315–334; English trans., ‘The Nature and Meaning of Numbers’, in Dedekind (1963), pp. 29–115.Google Scholar
  16. —— (1890): Letter to Keferstein, in Heijenoort (1967), pp. 98–103.Google Scholar
  17. —— (1963): Essays on The Theory of Numbers, W.W. Beman, ed. and trans., Dover: New York.Google Scholar
  18. Demopoulos, William, ed. (1995): Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Demopoulos, W. & Clarke, P. (2007): ‘The Logicism of Frege, Dedekind, and Russell’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic, S. Shapiro, ed., Oxford University Press, pp. 166–202.Google Scholar
  20. Dummett, Michael (1973): Frege: Philosophy of Language, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. —— (1991): Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ewald, William, ed. (1996): From Kant to Hilbert: A Sourcebook in the Foundations of Mathematics, Vols. I-II, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ferreirós, José (1999): Labyrinths of Thought: A History of Set Theory and its Role in Modern Mathematics, Birkhäuser: Basel; 2nd ed., 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. —— (2007): ‘The Rise of Pure Mathematics, as Arithmetic in Gauss’, in The Shaping of Arithmetic after C.F. Gauss’s Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, C. Goldstein, N. Schappacher & J. Schwermer, eds, Springer, pp. 235–268.Google Scholar
  25. —— (2009): ‘Hilbert, Logicism, and Mathematical Existence’, Synthese 170, 33–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. —— (2011): ’On Arbitrary Sets and ZF’, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17, 361–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. —— (forthcoming): ‘On Dedekind’s Logicism’, in Analytic Philosophy and the Foundations of Mathematics, A. Arana & C. Alvarez, eds, Palgrave: London.Google Scholar
  28. Ferreirós, J. & Gray, J., eds (2006): The Architecture of Modem Mathematics, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Frege, Gottlob (1879): Begriffsschrift, Nebert: Halle; reprinted by Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft: Darmstadt, 1977; English trans., Begriffsschrift, in Heijenoort (1967), pp. 1–82.Google Scholar
  30. —— (1884): Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, Koebner: Breslau; reprinted by Meiner, 1986, C. Thiel, ed.; English trans., by J.L. Austin, The Foundations of Arithmetic 1950; reprinted by Northwestern University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  31. —— (1893/1903): Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Vols. I and II, Pohle: Jena; reprinted by Olms: Hildesheim, 1998; English trans., in excerpts, The Basic Laws of Arithmetic, M. Furth, ed. and trans., University of California Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  32. Geach, P. & Black, M., eds (1952): Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Gray, Jeremy (2008): Plato’s Ghost: The Modernist Transformation of Mathematics, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hale, Bob (1987): Abstract Objects, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. —— (2001): ‘Reals by Abstraction’, Philosophia Mathematica 8, 100–123; reprinted in Hale & Wright (2001), pp. 399–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hale, B. & Wright, C. (2001): The Reason’s Proper Study: Essays Towards a Neo-Fregean Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heck, Richard (2011): Frege’s Theorem, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Heijenoort, Jean van, ed. (1967): From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Heis, Jeremy (2011): ‘Ernst Cassirer’s Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Geometry’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, 759–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hellman, Geoffrey (1989): Mathematics without Numbers: Towards a Modal Structural Interpretation, Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. Mancosu, Paolo, ed. (2008): The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Parsons, Charles (1983): Mathematics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. —— (2007): Mathematical Thought and its Objects, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reck, Erich (2003): ‘Dedekind’s Structuralism: An Interpretation and Partial Defense’, Synthese 137:3, pp. 369–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. —— (2005): ‘Frege’s Natural Numbers: Motivations and Modifications’, in Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Vol. III, M. Beaney & E. Reck, eds, Routledge: London, pp. 270–301.Google Scholar
  46. —— (2008): ‘Dedekind’s Contributions to the Foundations of Mathematics’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. Zalta, main editor; available online since April 22, 2008, pp. 1–32; updated and revised in 2011.Google Scholar
  47. Reck, E. & Price, M. (2000): ‘Structures and Structuralism in Contemporary Philosophy of Mathematics’, Synthese 125, 341–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Russell, Bertrand (1903): Principles of Mathematics; reprinted by Routledge: London, 1992.Google Scholar
  49. —— (1904): ‘The Axiom of Infinity’, Hibbert Journal 2, 809–812; reprinted in Essays in Analysis, D. Lackey, ed., Allen & Unwin: London, 1973, pp. 256–259.Google Scholar
  50. Russell, Bertrand (1919): Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Allen & Unwin: London.Google Scholar
  51. —— (1997): Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. —— (1996): ‘Space, Number and Structure: A Tale of Two Debates’, Philosophia Mathematica 4, 148–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sieg, W. & Schlimm, D. (2005): ‘Dedekind’s Analysis of Number: System and Axioms’, Synthese 147, 121–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simons, Peter (1998): ‘Structure and Abstraction’, in Philosophy of Mathematics Today, Matthias Schirn, ed., Clarendon Press: Oxford, pp. 485–501.Google Scholar
  55. Stein, Howard (1987): ‘Logos, Logic, and Logistiké: Some Philosophical Remarks on Nineteenth-Century Transformations of Mathematics’, in History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, W. Aspray & P. Kitcher, eds, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 238–259.Google Scholar
  56. Sundholm, Gö ran (2001): ‘Frege, August Bebel and the Return of Alsace-Lorraine: The Dating of the Distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung’, History and Philosophy of Logic 22, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tappenden, Jamie (2006): ‘The Riemannian Background to Frege’s Philosophy’, in J. Ferreirós & J. Gray (eds), pp. 97–132.Google Scholar
  58. Whitehead, A.N. & Russell, B. (1910–1913): Principia Mathematica, Vols. I-III, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1921/22): Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921; English trans., Kegan Paul: London, 1922.Google Scholar
  60. —— (1956): Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
  61. Wright, Crispin (1983): Frege’s Conception of Numbers as Objects, Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
  62. —— (1997): ‘On the Philosophical Significance of Frege’s Theorem’, in Language, Thought and Logic, R. Heck, ed., pp. 201–245; reprinted in Hale & Wright (2001), pp. 272–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Erich H. Reck 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erich H. Reck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations