Advertisement

Philosophy and the Tide of History: Bertrand Russell’s Role in the Rise of Analytic Philosophy

  • Stewart Candlish
Part of the History of Analytic Philosophy book series (History of Analytic Philosophy)

Abstract

The remarks I have chosen as an epigraph to this chapter encapsulate, neatly though perhaps inadvertently, a striking view of philosophy’s relation to its own history: that writing the history of philosophy involves time off from philosophy itself. Through examination of an intertwined set of examples, an examination which gives us a new perspective on those examples, I shall try to display the indefensibility of this view, and show that lack of attention to our own history leads us into bad philosophy, characterized by complacency and hubris, generating misguided projects, false assumptions, and the overlooking of serious alternatives.

Keywords

Collect Paper Definite Description True Proposition False Proposition Absolute Idealism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Further reading

  1. Ayer, A. J. (1972) Russell (London: Fontana).Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn, S. (2005) ‘Paradise regained’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXXVIII: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Candlish, S. (2007) The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy (Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar
  4. Cartwright, R. (1987a) ‘A neglected theory of truth’, in his Philosophical Essays (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 71–93.Google Scholar
  5. —— (1987b) ‘On the origins of Russell’s theory of descriptions’, in his Philosophical Essays (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 105–33.Google Scholar
  6. Chihara, C. (1972) ‘Russell’s theory of types’, in D. F. Pears (ed.), Bertrand Russell: A Collection of Critical Essays (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  7. Collini, S. (2006) Absent Minds: Intellectuals in Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, D. (2005) Truth and Predication (Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Denyer, N. (1991) Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  10. Frege, G. (1904) Letter to Russell 13.11.1904, in Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980): 160–6.Google Scholar
  11. Fussell, P. (1975) The Great War and Modern Memory (New York and London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Gaskin, R. (2008) The Unity of the Proposition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grayling, A. C. (1996) Russell (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Griffin, N. (1985) ‘Russell’s multiple relation theory of judgement’, Philosophical Studies, 47: 213–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. —— (1993) ‘Terms, relations, complexes’, in A. D. Irvine and G. A. Wedeking (eds), Russell and Analytic Philosophy (Toronto: University of Toronto Press): 159–92.Google Scholar
  16. Haack, S. (1978) Philosophy of Logics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hylton, P. (1990) Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  18. —— (2007) Quine (New York and Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, F. (2004) ‘Review of James Franklin, Corrupting the Youth: A History of Philosophy in Australia’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82/4: 652–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Judt, T. (2005) Postwar (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  21. Linsky, L. (1967) Referring (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  22. —— (1992) ‘The unity of the proposition’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 30: 243–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacIntyre, A. (1984) ‘The relationship of philosophy to its past’, in R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind and Q. Skinner (eds), Philosophy in History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Magee, B. (1971) Modern British Philosophy (London: Secker and Warburg).Google Scholar
  25. Makin, G. (2000) The Metaphysicians of Meaning: Russell and Frege on Sense and Denotation (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  26. Monk, R. (1996) Bertrand Russell: The Spirit of Solitude (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar
  27. Monk, R. and Palmer, A. (eds) (1996) Bertrand Russell and the Origins of Analytical Philosophy (Bristol: Thoemmes).Google Scholar
  28. Moore, G. E. (1903) ‘The refutation of idealism’, in his Philosophical Studies (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1922).Google Scholar
  29. —— (1944) ‘Russell’s “Theory of Descriptions”’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Bertrand Russell, third edition (Evanston: Harper and Row, 1963): 177–225.Google Scholar
  30. Noonan, H. (1996) ‘The Gray’s Elegy argument — and others’, in Monk and Palmer (eds): 65–102.Google Scholar
  31. Palmer, A. (1988) Concept and Object (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  32. Pears, D. F. (1967) Bertrand Russell and the British Tradition in Philosophy (London: Collins).Google Scholar
  33. Pigden, C. (2003) ‘Bertrand Russell: moral philosopher or unphilosophical moralist?’, in Griffin, N. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Pincock, C. (2008) ‘Russell’s last (and best) multiple-relation theory of judgement’, Mind, 117/465: 107–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quine, W. V. O. (1948) ‘On what there is’, Review of Metaphysics, 2: 21–38; Reprinted in his From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
  36. —— (1966) ‘Russell’s ontological development’, The Journal of Philosophy, 63/21: 657–67; Reprinted in R. Schoenman (ed.), Bertrand Russell: Philosopher of the Century (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ramsey, F. P. (1931) The Foundations of Mathematics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  38. Récanati, F. (1995) ‘Quasi-singular propositions: The semantics of belief reports’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume LXIX: 175–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Russell, B. (1893) ‘On the foundations of ethics’, in Russell 1983: 208–11.Google Scholar
  40. —— (1894) ‘Cleopatra or Maggie Tulliver’, in Russell 1983: 92–8.Google Scholar
  41. —— (1897a) ‘Seems, madam? Nay, it is’, in Russell 1983: 106–11.Google Scholar
  42. —— (1897b) An Essay on the Foundations of Geometry (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
  43. —— (1903) The Principles of Mathematics (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1937).Google Scholar
  44. —— (1904a) ‘Meinong’s theory of complexes and assumptions’, in Russell 1994: 432–74.Google Scholar
  45. —— (1904b) Letter to Frege 12.12.1904, in Frege, G. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980): 166–70.Google Scholar
  46. —— (1905) ‘On denoting’, in Russell 1994: 415–27.Google Scholar
  47. —— (1907) ‘On the nature of truth’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, VII, 1906–7: 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. —— (1908) ‘Mathematical logic as based on the theory of types’, in R. C. Marsh (ed.), Logic and Knowledge (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1956): 57–102.Google Scholar
  49. —— (1910) ‘On the nature of truth and falsehood’, in Russell 1992: 116–24.Google Scholar
  50. —— (1911) ‘Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description’, in Russell 1992: 147–61.Google Scholar
  51. —— (1916) Letter to Lady Ottoline Morrell, reprinted in Russell 1968: 281–2, and in Russell 1986: xix-xx.Google Scholar
  52. —— (1919) Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  53. —— (1924) ‘Logical atomism’, in Russell 1988: 160–79.Google Scholar
  54. —— (1937) ‘Introduction to the second edition’, The Principles of Mathematics (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  55. —— (1959) My Philosophical Development (London: George Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  56. —— (1968) The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, Volume 2. Single volume edition (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1975).Google Scholar
  57. —— (1983) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 1: Cambridge Essays 1888–99 (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  58. —— (1986) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 8: The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays 1914–19 (London: George Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
  59. —— (1988) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 9: Essays on Language, Mind and Matter 1919–26 (London: Routledge, 1994).Google Scholar
  60. —— (1992) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 6: Logical and Philosophical Papers 1909–13 (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  61. —— (1994) The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 4: Foundations of Logic 1903–05 (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  62. Russell, B. and Whitehead, A. N. (1910) [See Whitehead and Russell].Google Scholar
  63. Sainsbury, R. M. (1979) Russell (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  64. —— (1996) ‘How can we say something?’ in Monk and Palmer (eds), Reprinted under its intended title, ‘How can some thing say something?’ in Sainsbury, Departing from Frege: Essays in the Philosophy of Language (London and New York: Routledge, 2002): 137–53.Google Scholar
  65. Schaffer, J. (2007) ‘From nihilism to monism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85/2: 175–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Slater, J. G. (1986) ‘Introduction’, in Russell 1986.Google Scholar
  67. Sprigge, T. (1983) The Vindication of Absolute Idealism (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  68. Stevens, G. (2004) ’From Russell’s paradox to the theory of judgement: Wittgenstein and Russell on the unity of the proposition’, Theoria, 70: 28–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Strawson, P. F. (1950) ‘On Referring’, Mind, 59: 320–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitehead, A. N. and Russell, B. (1910) Principia Mathematica, second edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1925).Google Scholar
  71. Wittgenstein, L. (1913) Letter to Russell, in Wittgenstein, Letters to Russell, Keynes and Moore (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974): 24.Google Scholar
  72. —— (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus trans. C. K. Ogden (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stewart Candlish 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stewart Candlish

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations