Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Elections, Voting, Technology ((EVT))

  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

When a typical US citizen considers “election monitors,” he or she might consider a team of US observers traveling to other countries, such as Kenya when it held its 2013 national election. In Kenya, according to the Carter Center, “[t]he country has a longstanding history of ethnic-fueled electoral violence, which culminated in postelection violence in 2007–2008 that left more than 1,000 people dead and over 600,000 internally displaced.”1 International election monitoring is provided by organizations worldwide in order “to support efforts to strengthen democratic processes and institutions and to support the conduct of elections that meet international standards, are peaceful, and have credible results.”2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Liptak, Adam. 2013. “Voting Rights Act Challenged as Cure the South Has Outgrown.” The New York Times, February 17, 2013, at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/18/us/politics/supreme-court-to-hear-alabama-countys-challenge-to-voting-rights-act.html?_ r=0, last accessed April 6, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hale, Kathleen and Mitchell Brown. 2013. “Adopting, Adapting, and Opting Out: State Response to Federal Voting System Guidelines.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43(3): 428–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See also Hale, Kathleen, Robert Montjoy and Mitchell Brown. 2015. Administering Elections: How American Elections Work. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. See Ewald, Alec C. 2009. The Way We Vote: The Local Dimension of American Suffrage. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pildes, Richard. 2006. “Introduction” in David L. Epstein, Richard H. Pildes, Rodolfo O. de la Garza, and Sharyn O’Halloran (eds.) The Future of the Voting Rights Act. Russell Sage Foundation: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Grofman, Bernard, Lisa Handley and Richard G. Niemi. 1992. Minority Representation and the Quest for Voting Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: page 16.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Pildes, Richard. 2006. “The Future of Voting Rights Policy: From Anti-Discrimination to the Right to Vote.” Howard Law Journal 49(3): 741–765, page 744.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel P. Tokaji. 2006. “If It’s Broke, Fix It: Improving Voting Rights Act Preclearance.” Howard Law Journal 49(3): 785–842.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasen, Richard L. 2006. “Congressional Power to Renew Preclearance Provisions” in David L. Epstein, Richard H. Pildes, Rodolfo O. de la Garza, and Sharyn O’Halloran (eds.) The Future of the Voting Rights Act. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Piven, Frances Fox and Richard A. Cloward. 1988. “National Voter Registration Reform: How It Might Be Won.” PS: Political Science and Politics 21(4): 868–875. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/420026.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For more information, see Kropf, Martha and David Kimball. 2012. Helping America Vote? The Limits of Election Reform. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coleman, Kevin J. and Eric A. Fisher. 2014. The Help America Vote Act and Election Administration: Overview and Issues, December 17, 2014, Congressional Research Service, at http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS20898.pdf, last accessed January 8, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens, John Paul. 2008. Crawford v. Marion County Election Board. 553 U.S. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See for example, Tokaji, Daniel P. 2006. “The New Vote Denial: Where Election Reform Meets the New Voting Rights Act.” South Carolina Law Review 57(4): 689–733.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and David Brockington. 2003. Electoral Reform and Minority Representation: Local Experiments with Alternative Elections. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kropf, M.E. (2016). The Federal Part of the Institution. In: Institutions and the Right to Vote in America. Elections, Voting, Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-30171-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics