Skip to main content

‘The Monstrous Regiment’: Literature and the Women’s Liberation Movement

  • Chapter
The History of British Women’s Writing, 1970-Present

Part of the book series: The History of British Women’s Writing ((HBWW))

Abstract

The Women’s Liberation Movement produced feminist writers and readers. It inspired specialist publishers and small presses, as well as academic study, bolstering further interest in women’s writing. The relationship between artistic creation, political identity, and commerce was both mutually strengthening and deeply problematic. Writers explored what the feminist slogan ‘the personal is political’ might mean; readers consumed fiction that encapsulated their own experiences in its focus on the previously unrepresented aspects of women’s private lives. This second wave of feminism created ‘monsters’ in the eyes of detractors, and feminists exploited the ‘monstrous’ in a sustained challenge to the notion of appropriate ‘feminine’ behaviours. One feminist theatre group took the moniker ‘Monstrous Regiment’, thus subverting John Knox’s famous sixteenth-century tract attacking female power. Other misogynist terms, such as ‘Virago’ and ‘Shrew’, were rehabilitated and celebrated by feminists with deliberate irony.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 95.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Juliet Mitchell, ‘Women: The Longest Revolution’, New Left Review, 1:40 (November–December 1966), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hannah Gavron, The Captive Wife (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1966), p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Penelope Mortimer, The Pumpkin Eater (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964), p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fay Weldon, ‘Me and My Shadows’, On Gender and Writing, ed. Michelene Wandor (London: Pandora, 1983), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fay Weldon, Down Among the Women (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973), p. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zoe Fairbairns, ‘Saying What We Want’, The Feminist Seventies, ed. Helen Graham, Ann Kaloski, Ali Neilson, and Emma Robertson (York: Raw Nerve Books, 2003), p. 101. Spare Rib was first published in December 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eve Setch, ‘The Face of Metropolitan Feminism: The London Women’s Liberation Workshop, 1969–79’, Twentieth Century British History, 13:2 (2002), p. 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaitlynn Mendes, ‘Framing Feminism: News Coverage of the Women’s Movement in British and American Newspapers, 1968–1982’, Social Movement Studies, 10:1 (2011), p. 86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patricia Ashdown Sharp quoted in Angela Neustatter, Hyenas in Petticoats: A Look at Twenty Years of Feminism (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eva Figes, Patriarchal Attitudes (London: Virago, 1978), p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Michele Roberts, Paper Houses (London: Virago, 2007), p. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  12. ‘Women Writing’, Jean Radford interviews Michele Roberts and Sara Maitland, Spare Rib, 76 (November 1978), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zoe Fairbairns et al., ‘Martha and Mary Raise Consciousness from the Dead’, Tales I Tell My Mother (London: Journeyman Press, 1978), pp. 71–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michele Roberts, A Piece of the Night (London: The Women’s Press, 1978), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zoe Fairbairns, ‘On Writing Benefits’, No Turning Back: Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement 1975–80, ed. Feminist Anthology Collective (London: The Women’s Press, 1981), p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zoe Fairbairns, Benefits (London: Virago, 1979), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Feminist Anthology Collective, ‘Introduction’, No Turning Back: Writings from the Women’s Liberation Movement 1975–80 (London: The Women’s Press, 1981), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Simone Murray, Mixed Media: Feminist Presses and Publishing Politics (London: Pluto, 2004), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rebecca O’Rourke, ‘Summer Reading’, Feminist Review, 2 (1979), p. 117, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosalind Coward, ‘“This Novel Changes Lives”: Are Women’s Novels Feminist Novels? A Response to Rebecca O’Rourke’s Article “Summer Reading”‘, Feminist Review, 5 (1980), p. 53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. For an account of this phenomenon in a US context, see Alice Echols, Daring to be Bad: Radical Feminism in America 1967–1975 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989), p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rita Felski, Beyond Feminist Aesthetics (London: Hutchinson Radius, 1989), p. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lisa Maria Hogeland, Feminism and its Fictions (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ‘A Literature of Our Own’, Elaine Showaiter interviewed by Rozsika Parker and Amanda Sebestyen, Spare Rib, 78 (January 1979), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elaine Showalter, A Literature of Their Own (London: Virago, 1984), p. 318.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Margaret Drabble, The Millstone (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (1929; London: Triad Grafton, 1977), p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Toril Moi, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (London: Methuen, 1985), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cora Kaplan, ‘Feminist Criticism Twenty Years On’, From My Guy to Sci-Fi: Genre and Women’s Writing in the Postmodern World, ed. Helen Carr (London: Pandora, 1989), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Terry Lovell, ed., British Feminist Thought: A Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pat Barker, Liza’s England (London: Virago, 1996), p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hazel V. Carby, ‘White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood’, Black British Cultural Studies, ed. Houston A. Baker Jr, Manthia Diawara, and Ruth H. Lindeborg (University of Chicago Press, 1996), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pratibha Parmar, ‘Other Kinds of Dreams’, Feminist Review, 31 (Spring 1989), p. 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Buchi Emecheta, In the Ditch (London: Flamingo, 1988), p. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Susheila Nasta, Home Truths: Fictions of the South Asian Diaspora in Britain (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002), p. 182. Nasta notes that ‘British Asian’ comes into currency in 1988 after the Commission for Racial Equality’s recommendation that the British Asian population no longer be classified as ‘black’.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Funded by the Greater London Council. See Miriam Ticktin, ‘Contemporary British Asian Women’s Writing: Social Movement or Literary Tradition?’, Women: A Cultural Review, 7:1 (1996), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ravinder Randhawa, A Wicked Old Woman (London: The Women’s Press, 1987), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jeanette Winterson, Oranges Are Not the Only Fruit (London: Pandora, 1985), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Angela Carter, ‘Notes From the Front Line’, in Wandor (1983), p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Angela Carter, The Passion of New Eve (London: Virago, 1982), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shirley Conran, Lace (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982), p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rita Felski, Doing Time: Feminist Theory and Postmodern Culture (New York University Press, 2000), p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Angela Carter, The Sadeian Woman: An Exercise in Cultural History (London: Virago, 1979), p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jill Tweedie, ‘Strange Places’, in Wandor (1983), p. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Maria Lauret, Liberating Literature: Feminist Fiction in America (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 187.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Imelda Whelehan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whelehan, I. (2015). ‘The Monstrous Regiment’: Literature and the Women’s Liberation Movement. In: Eagleton, M., Parker, E. (eds) The History of British Women’s Writing, 1970-Present. The History of British Women’s Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29481-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics