In 1900 a conference of delegates from trade unions and socialist societies (led by Keir Hardie) met in London in order to reflect on the means to improve the representation of the working class in British parliamentary institutions. It was decided to form the Labour Representation Committee and work towards the election of working-class men in the House of Commons. At the time, British employers feared contagion from the Continent, where the emergence of trade unionism and the gradual extension of suffrage1 appeared a potential threat to the constitutional status quo and to their interests. In 1906, 29 Members of Parliament (MPs) were elected with the support of the Labour Coordinating Committee (LCC) and chose the name Labour Party. A party constitution was adopted in 1918. The objective was to reform the British parliamentary system in accordance with its demographic and social transformation and to propose to the newly enfranchised electorate an alternative to the Liberal and Conservative parties.
KeywordsTrade Union Party Leader Labour Government Labour Party Electoral College
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adams, T. (2008) ‘The Comeback Kid: Peter Mandelson’, The Guardian, December 20, at http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/2008/dec/21/peter-mandelson, date accessed February 1, 2013.
- Andersson, J. (2010) The Library and the Workshop: Social Democracy and Capitalism in the Knowledge Age (Stanford CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
- Avril, E. (2007) Du Labour au New Labour de Tony Blair (Villeneuve-d’Ascq: Presses Universitaire du Septentrion).Google Scholar
- Beer, S. H. (1982) Modern British Politics, 3rd revised edn. (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar
- Cowley, P. (2005) The Rebels: How Blair Mislaid His Majority (London: Politico’s Publishing).Google Scholar
- Cracknell, R. (2009) ‘social Background of MPs.’ http://126.96.36.199/ukparliament/20090701094430/http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/briefings/snsg-01528.pdf date accessed February 1, 2013.Google Scholar
- Drucker, H. M. (1979) Doctrine and Ethos in the Labour Party (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
- Farrell, D. and P. Webb (2000) ‘Political Parties as Campaign Organizations’, in R. Dalton and M. P. Wattenberg (eds) Political Parties as Campaign Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Faucher-King, F. (2009) ‘The Party Is Over: the “Modernization” of the British Labour Party’, in T. Casey (ed.) Britain After Blair (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan), pp. 39–51.Google Scholar
- Faucher-King, F. and P. Le Galès (2010a) Les gouvernements New Labour, Le bilan de Tony Blair et Gordon Brown (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po).Google Scholar
- Faucher-King, F. and P. Le Galès (2010b) The New Labour Experiment: Change and Reform Under Blair and Brown (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
- Gould, P. (1999) The Unfinished Revolution: How the Modernisers Saved the Labour Party, new edn. (London: Abacus).Google Scholar
- Heath, A. F., R. M. Jowell, J. K. Curtice and B. Taylor (eds) (1994) Labour’s Last Chance? The 1992 Election and Beyond (Aldershot: Dartmouth).Google Scholar
- Jones, N. (1996) Soundbites and Spin Doctors: How Politicians Manipulate the Media — And Vice Versa (London: Indigo Cassell).Google Scholar
- Labour Party (1999) 21st Century Party. Members — The Key to Our Future (Great Britain: Labour Party).Google Scholar
- Minkin, L. (1992) The Contentious Alliance: Trade Unions and the Labour Party, new ed. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
- Shaw, E. (1996) The Labour Party Since 1945: Old Labour — New Labour (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell).Google Scholar
- Shaw, E. (2007) Losing Labour’s Soul?: New Labour and the Blair Government 1997–2007 (London: Routledge).Google Scholar