Advertisement

Abstract

The SAP is one of the most successful political parties of the 20th century. By combining principled reformism and tactical pragmatism, it became the major reference point in Swedish politics, and its successes have been studied and envied the world over. Yet in the early part of the 21st century the party has not avoided the electoral decline and diminishing political influence that other center-left parties have suffered from. Starting with its historical evolution, this chapter will look into the party’s development, examine its structure and policies, and assesses its ability to find a way out of its current crisis.

Keywords

Trade Union Full Employment Party Leadership Social Democratic Social Democratic Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn, J. (1996) ‘Ideology and Interest: The Case of Swedish Social Democracy, 1886–1911’, Politics and Society 24(2), 153–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. and T. Meyer (2003) ‘social Democracy, Unions, and Pension Politics in Germany and Sweden’, Journal of Public Policy 23(1), 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, I. and J. Weibull (1973) Swedish History in Brief (Södertälje: Wiking Tryckeri AB/the Swedish Institute).Google Scholar
  4. Arter, D. (1994) ‘“The War of the Roses”: Conflict and Cohesion in the Swedish Social Democratic Party’ in D. S. Bell and E. Shaw (eds) Conflict and Cohesion in Western European Social Democratic Parties (London: Pinter), pp. 70–95.Google Scholar
  5. Arter, D. (1999) Scandinavian Politics Today (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  6. Åsard, E. and L. Bennett (1997) Democracy and the Marketplace of Ideas, Communication and Government in Sweden and the United States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Aucante, Y. and J. Hinforss (2010) ‘social Democracy, Ideological Change, and the Global Crisis: Lost Opportunity or Business as Usual?’, Paper presented at the Annual Swepsa Conference, Gothenburg, 30 September – 2 October, (http://www.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1315/1315852_jonas-yohann-submitted-version-swepsa-2010-policyval-vid-samh — llsf — r — ndring.pdf, date accessed June 26, 2012).
  8. Aylott, N. (1997) ‘Between Europe and Unity: The Case of the Swedish Social Democrats’, West European Politics 20(2), 119–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aylott, N. (2003) ‘After the Divorce Social Democrats and Trade Unions in Sweden’, Party Politics 3(9), 369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aylott, N. (2005) ‘President Persson-How Did Sweden Get Him?’ in T. Poguntke and P. Webb (eds) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 176–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berman, S. (1998) The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Blyth, M. (2002) Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burkitt, B. and P. Whyman (1995) ‘Lessons from Sweden: Full Employment and the Evolution of Keynesian Political Economy’, Renewal 3(1), 24–36.Google Scholar
  14. Carlbom, M. (2012) ‘Rödgröna nära egen majoritet’, Dagens Nyheter, June 26 (http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/rodgrona-nara-egen-majoritet date accessed July 13, 2012).
  15. Castles, F. (1976) ‘Policy Innovation and Institutional Stability in Sweden’, British Journal of Political Science 6(2), 203–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Childs, M. (1936) Sweden: The Middle Way (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  17. De Geer, H. (1992) The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model: The Employers’ Confederation, SAF, and Industrial Relations over Ten Decades (Chichester: Carden Publications).Google Scholar
  18. Eklund, K. (2001) ‘Gösta Rehn and the Swedish Model: Did we follow the Rehn-Meidner Model too little rather than too much?’ in H. Milner and E. Wadensjö (eds) Gösta Rehn, the Swedish Model and Labour Market Policies: International and National Perspectives (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 53–72.Google Scholar
  19. Elder, N. C. M. and E. C. Page (2000) ‘sweden: The Quest for Coordination’ in B. G. Peters, R. A. W. Rhodes and V. Wright (eds) Administering the Summit: Administration of the Core Executive in Developed Countries, (Basingstoke: MacMillan), pp. 134–52.Google Scholar
  20. Eriksson, R. (2004) ‘AD ger Byggbnads r;tt’, Dagens Nyheter, December 22 (http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/ad-ger-byggnads-ratt, date accessed June 11, 2011).
  21. Erixon, L. (2001) ‘A Swedish Economic Policy — The Rehn-Meidner Model’s Theory, Application and Validity’ in H. Milner and E. Wadensjö (eds) Gösta Rehn, the Swedish Model and Labour Market Policies: International and National Perspectives (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 13–49.Google Scholar
  22. Esping-Andersen, G. and K. Kersbergen (1992) ‘Contemporary Research on Social Democracy’, Annual Review of Sociology 18, 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eurofound, (2010) ‘Laval Case’, (http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/areas/industrialrela-tions/dictionary/definitions/lavalcase.htm, date accessed April 11, 2012).
  24. Gidlund, G. (1992) ‘From Popular Movement to Political Party: Development of the Social Democratic Labor Party Organization’ in K. Misgeld, K. Molin and K. Åmark (eds) Creating Social Democracy. A Century of the Social Democratic Labor Party in Sweden (Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press), pp. 97–130.Google Scholar
  25. Gould, A. (1999) ‘The Erosion of the Welfare State: Swedish Social Policy and the EU’, Journal of European Social Policy 9(2), 165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould, A. (2000) ‘swedish Social Policy and the EU Social Dimension’ in L. Miles (ed.) Sweden and the European Union Evaluated (London and New York: Continuum), pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
  27. Green, J. (1995) ‘Public Finances, Adjustment Programs, and Debt Dynamics: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State’, International Monetary Fund Occasional Paper 130, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
  28. Gstöhl, S. (2002) Reluctant Europeans: Norway, Sweden and Switzerland in the Process of Integration (London: Lynne Riener).Google Scholar
  29. Hancock, M. (1978) ‘Productivity, Welfare and Participation in Sweden and West Germany: A Comparison of Social Democratic Reform Prospects’, Comparative Politics 11(1), 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, J.-B. (2000) ‘still Corporatism in Scandinavia? A Survey of Recent Empirical Findings,’ Scandinavian Political Studies 23(2), 157–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hinnfors, J. (2006) Reinterpreting Social Democracy (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  32. Hirdman, Y. (1988) Vi Bygger Landet (Stockholm: Tiden).Google Scholar
  33. Ingebritsen, C. (1998) The Nordic States and European Unity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Johansson, M. and A. Nilsson (2000) Persson: tankar och tal (Stockholm: Hjalmarson and Högberg).Google Scholar
  35. Lewin, L. (1967) Planhushållningsdebatten (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar
  36. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  37. Lindahl, R. (2000) ‘swedish Public Opinion and the EU’ in L. Miles (ed.) Sweden and the European Union Evaluated (London and New York: Continuum), pp. 97–124.Google Scholar
  38. Lindahl, R. and D. Naurin (2005) ‘sweden: The Twin Faces of a Euro-outsider’, Journal of European Integration 27(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lindbeck, A. (1997) ‘The Swedish Experiment’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(3), 1273–319.Google Scholar
  40. Lindgren, K. O. (2000) ‘EU-medlemskapets inverkan på den svenska parlamentarismen’, Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift 103, 133–220.Google Scholar
  41. LO (1996) ‘Utlåtanden del 1 och del 2, LO-kongressen 1996’ (LO: Stockholm).Google Scholar
  42. Lundberg, E. (1985) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Swedish Model’, Journal of Economic Literature 23(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
  43. Martin, A. (1979) ‘The Dynamics of Change in a Keynesian Political Economy: The Swedish Case and Its Implications’ in C. Crouch (ed.) State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (London: Croom Helm), pp. 88–121.Google Scholar
  44. Macallister, T. (2009) ‘sweden lifts ban on nuclear power’, The Guardian, February 5.Google Scholar
  45. Miles, L. (2000) ‘Making Peace with the Union? The Swedish Social Democratic Party and European Integration’, in R. Geyer, C. Ingebritsen and J. W. Moses (eds) Globalization, Europeanization and the End of Scandinavian Social Democracy? (Basingstoke: Palgrave), pp. 218–39.Google Scholar
  46. Miles, L. (2004) ‘sweden: “Hitchhiking” and the Euro Referendum’, Cooperation & Conflict 39(2), 154–64.Google Scholar
  47. Milner, H. (1990) Sweden: Social Democracy in Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  48. Möller, T. (1999) ‘The Swedish Election 1998: A Protest Vote and the Birth of a New Political Landscape’, Scandinavian Political Studies 22(3), 261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Möller, T. (2002) ‘Election Year 2002: Sweden’s Social Democrats Consolidate Their Dominance’, Current Sweden 439.Google Scholar
  50. Mosley, L. (2003) Global Capital and National Governments (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murhem, S. (2003) ‘Turning to Europe. A New Swedish Industrial Relations Regime in the 1990s’, PhD Thesis, University of Upssala.Google Scholar
  52. Öberg, P. (2002) ‘Does Administrative Corporatism Promote Trust and Deliberation?’, Governance 15(4), 455–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Öberg, P. and T. Svensson (2002) ‘Power, Trust and Deliberation in Swedish Labour Market Politics’, Economic and Industrial Democracy 23(4), 451–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Östberg, K. (2012) ‘swedish Social Democracy After the Cold War’ in B. Evans and I. Schmidt (eds) Social Democracy After the Cold War (Edmonton: AU Press) pp. 205–34.Google Scholar
  55. Persson, I. (2004) ‘De ifrågasätter föreningsrätten’ Aftonbladet, 27 November (http://www.aftonbladet.se/ledare/article10506191.ab, accessed March 17, 2011).
  56. Poguntke, T. and P. Webb (2005) The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pontusson, J. (1991) ‘Labor, Corporatism and Industrial Policy: The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Politics 23(2), 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramaswamyr, R. and J. Green (1995) ‘Recession and Recovery in the 1990s: Challenges to the Swedish Welfare State’, International Monetary Fund Occasional Paper 130 (IMF: Washington D.C.), pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  59. Ruin, O. (2000) ‘The Europeanization of Swedish Politics’ in L. Miles (ed.) Sweden and the European Union Evaluated (London and New York: Continuum), pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
  60. Ryner, M. (2004) Capitalist Restructuring, Globalisation and the Third Way: Lessons from the Swedish Model (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  61. SAP, (1979) Ekonomisk demokrati och löntagarfonder. Partistyrelsens utlåtande över motionerna 35:01–35:24. Bilagor till partistyrelsens protokoll. Löntagrainflytande och löntagarfonder, Series: A2B Volume: 032.Google Scholar
  62. SAP (1981) Socialdemokartiska partikongress 1981 ‘Framtid för Sverige (Protocols B-D)’ (Borås: Sjuhäradsbygdens Tryckeri AB).Google Scholar
  63. SAP (1997) The Constitution of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, (http://www.social-demokraterna.se/upload/Internationellt/Other%20Languages/SAPconstitution_eng. pdf, date accessed February 4, 2012).
  64. SAP (2001) Party Program of the Social Democratic Party, (http://www.socialdemokraterna.se/upload/Internationellt/Other%20Languages/party_program_english.pdf, date accessed February 10, 2012).
  65. SAP (2006) Election Manifesto 2006, (http://www.socialdemokraterna.se/upload/interna-tionellt/other%20languages/electionmanifesto2006.pdf, date accessed July 30, 2012).
  66. SAP (2012) The Constitution of the Swedish Social Democratic Party (http://www.socialdemokraterna.se/upload/Internationellt/Other%20Languages/SAPconstitution_eng. pdf, date accessed June 10, 2012).
  67. Sainsbury, D. (1991) ‘swedish Social Democracy in Transition: The Party’s Record in the 1980s and the Challenge of the 1990s’, West European Politics 14(3), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. SCB (2011) Åttapartivalet 2010: Allmänna valen: Valundersökningen, (http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/ME0106_2010A01_BR_ME05BR1101.pdf, date accessed June 28, 2012).
  69. Sundell, C. (2010) ‘sveriges enda arbetarparti’, Aftonbladet, July 4 (http://www.afton-bladet.se/nyheter/article12376638.ab, date accessed July 31, 2012).
  70. Therborn, G. (1991) ‘swedish Social Democracy and the Transition from Industrial to Postindustrial Politics,’ in F. Poxiven (ed.) Labor Parties in Postindustrial Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press), pp. 101–23.Google Scholar
  71. Tsarouhas, D. (2008) Social Democracy in Sweden: The Threat from a Globalized World (London and New York: IB Tauris).Google Scholar
  72. Tilton, T. A. (1979) ‘swedish Road to Socialism: Ernst Wigforss and the Ideological Foundations of Swedish Social Democracy’, American Political Science Review 73(2), 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vartiainen, J. (1998) ‘Understanding Swedish Social Democracy: Victims of Success?’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14(1), 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Widfeldt, A. (1999) Linking Parties with People? Party Membership in Sweden 1960–1997 (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dimitris Tsarouhas 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Tsarouhas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations