Advertisement

Methodological Approaches in Political Psychology: Discourse and Narrative

  • Phillip L. Hammack
  • Andrew Pilecki
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series book series (PSPP)

Abstract

In his speech formally nominating US president Barack Obama for re-election at the 2012 Democratic National Convention, former President Bill Clinton used the power of language to forge a link between Obama and the would-be voter. He crafted contrasting societal narratives of ‘you’re-on-your-own’ versus ‘we’re-all-in-this-together’, evoking contrasting imagery of isolation versus community in the midst of hardship and linking these narratives to two distinct party ideologies. The speech was rhetorically constructed to motivate and inspire an electorate that had become increasingly complacent amidst continued economic decline and the bitterness of an ugly campaign. Clinton delivered a series of rational arguments about why re-electing Obama would be vital — arguments rooted at least in part, as he put it, in ‘arithmetic’. Employing a rhetoric not just of reason but also of emotion (‘And if you will renew the president’s contract, you will feel it. You will feel it.’), he argued that Obama represented not just the sound, logical choice but the only hope for a politics of ‘cooperation’ rather than ‘constant conflict’.

Keywords

Discourse Analysis Discursive Practice Intergroup Relation Political Psychology Critical Discourse Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, M. (2007) Shaping History: Narratives of Political Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Tal, D. (2007) ‘Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts’. American Behavioural Scientist, 50(11): 1430–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, B. K. (2009) ‘Making Sense and No Sense of War: Issues of Identity and Meaning in Adolescents’ Experience with Political Conflict’. In: Barber, B. K. ed. Adolescents and War: How Youth Deal with Political Violence. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Billig, M. (1996) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology (2nd edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blumer, H. (1969) Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. S. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. S. (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Buckley-Zistel, S. (2009) ‘Nation, narration, unification? The politics of history teaching after the Rwandan genocide’. Journal of Genocide Research, 11(1): 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Charlick-Paley, T. and Sylvan, D. A. (2000) ‘The use and evolution of stories as a mode of problem representation: Soviet and French military officers face the loss of empire’. Political Psychology, 21(4): 697–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Chomsky, N. (1957) Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  16. Clinton, W. J. (2012, September). Speech to the Democratic National Convention. Charlotte, NC.Google Scholar
  17. Cohler, B. J. (1982) ‘Personal Narrative and the Life Course’. In: Baltes, P. B. and Brim, O. G. eds. Life Span Development and Behaviour. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. de Saussure, F. (1972) Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). Chicago: Open Court. (Original work published 1916)Google Scholar
  19. Durrheim, K. (2012) ‘Discourse, action, rhetoric: From a perception to an action paradigm in social psychology’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3): 456–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Durrheim, K. and Dixon, J. (2005) ‘Studying talk and embodied practices: Toward a psychology of materiality of “race relations”’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15: 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards, D. (1991) ‘Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization’. Theory and Psychology, 1: 515–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power (2nd edition). Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
  25. Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Fairclough, N. (2010) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd edition). Harlow, UK: Pearson.Google Scholar
  27. Fattah, K. and Fierke, K. M. (2009) ‘A clash of emotions: The politics of humiliation and political violence in the Middle East’. European Journal of International Relations, 15 (1): 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language (A. M. S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  29. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (1982) ‘The subject and power’. Critical Inquiry, 8: 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gavey, N. (1989) ‘Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis: Contributions to feminist psychology’. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13(4): 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gergen, K. J. and Gergen, M. M. (1983) ‘Narratives of the Self’. In: Sarbin, T. R. and Scheibe, K. E. eds. Studies in Social Identity. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  35. Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  36. Hammack, P. L. (2006) ‘Identity, conflict, and coexistence: Life stories of Israeli and Palestinian adolescents’. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21(4): 323–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hammack, P. L. (2008) ‘Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity’. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3): 222–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hammack, P. L. (2011a) Narrative and the Politics of Identity: The Cultural Psychology of Israeli and Palestinian Youth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hammack, P. L. (2011b) ‘Narrative and the politics of meaning’. Narrative Inquiry, 21(2): 311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hammack, P. L. (2014). ‘Mind, Story, Society: The Political Psychology of Narrative’. In: Hanne, M., Crano, W. and Mio, J. eds. Warring with Words: Narrative and Metaphor in Politics. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hammack, P. L. and Pilecki, A. (2012) ‘Narrative as a root metaphor for political psychology’. Political Psychology, 33(1): 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Herrera, M. and Reicher, S. (1998) ‘Making sides and taking sides: An analysis of salient images and category constructions for pro- and anti-Gulf War respondents’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6): 981–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hook, D. (2001) ‘Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis’. Theory and Psychology, 11(4): 521–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hook, D. (2005) ‘Genealogy, discourse, “effective history”: Foucault and the work of critique’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(1): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hyde, P. (2000) ‘Managing bodies — managing relationships: The popular media and the social construction of women’s bodies and social roles from the 1930s to the 1950s’. Journal of Sociology, 36(2): 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jäger, S. and Maier, F. (2009) ‘Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of Foucauldian Critical Discourse Analysis and Dispositive Analysis’. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Lieblich, A., Tuval-Mashiach, R. and Zilber, T. (1998) Narrative Research: Reading, Analysis, and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. McAdams, D. P. and Bowman, P. J. (2001) ‘Narrating Life’s Turning Points: Redemption and Contamination’. In: McAdams, D. P., Josselson, R. and Lieblich, A. eds. Turns in the Road: Narrative Studies of Lives in Transition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A. H. and Bowman, P. J. (2001) ‘When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative, and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 472–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  51. Nesbitt-Larking, P. and Kinnvall, C. (2012) ‘The discursive frames of political psychology’. Political Psychology, 33(1): 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pilecki, A. and Hammack, P. L. (2013) ‘“Victims” versus “righteous victims”: The rhetorical construction of social categories in historical dialogue among Israeli and Palestinian youth’. Political Psychology. doi: 10.1111/pops.12063.Google Scholar
  53. Plummer, K. (2001) Documents of Life 2: An Invitation to Critical Humanism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Potter, J. (1998) ‘Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices’. European Review of Social Psychology, 9: 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Potter, J. (2003) ‘Discursive psychology: Between method and paradigm’. Discourse and Society, 14(6): 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Potter, J., Edwards, D. and Wetherell, M. (1993) ‘A model of discourse in action’. American Behavioural Scientist, 36 (3): 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1995a) ‘Discourse Analysis’. In: Smith, J. A., Harré, R. and van Langenhove, L. eds. Rethinking Methods in Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  60. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1995b) ‘Natural order: Why social psychologists should study (a constructed version of) natural language, and why they have not done so’. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14: 216–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Potter, J., Wetherell, M., Gill, R. and Edwards, D. (1990) ‘Discourse: Noun, verb or social practice?’. Philosophical Psychology, 3: 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reicher, S., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, N. and Levine, M. (2006) ‘Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1): 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reicher, S. and Hopkins, N. (1996) ‘Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2): 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reicher, S. and Hopkins, N. (2001) ‘Psychology and the end of history: A critique and proposal for the psychology of social categorization’. Political Psychology, 22(2): 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation (Vols. I and II). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Sapir, E. (1921) Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
  67. Sapir, E. (1949) Selected Writings in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  68. Tileaga, C. (2005) ‘Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies’. Discourse and Society, 16(5): 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tileaga, C. (2006) ‘Representing the “Other”: A discursive analysis of prejudice and moral exclusion in talk about Romanies’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16(1): 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tileaga, C. (2007) ‘Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discourse reframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46: 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. van Dijk, T. A. (1993) ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’. Discourse and Society, 4: 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Dijk, T. (2008) Discourse and Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  73. Verkuyten, M. (2005) ‘Immigration discourses and their impact on multiculturalism: A discursive and experimental study’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2): 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Volosinov, V. N. (1973) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929).Google Scholar
  75. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Whorf, B. L. (1956) Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  78. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (2009) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis: History, Agenda, Theory and Methodology’. In: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Wooffitt, R. (2005) Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  80. Yates, S. and Hiles, D. (2010) ‘Towards a “critical ontology of ourselves”?: Foucault, subjectivity and discourse analysis’. Theory and Psychology, 20(1): 52–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Phillip L. Hammack and Andrew Pilecki 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip L. Hammack
  • Andrew Pilecki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations