Advertisement

Gender, Race and Ethnic Relations

  • Sebastian E. Bartoş
  • Peter Hegarty
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology Series book series (PSPP)

Abstract

After the Second World War, ‘prejudice’ became an object of the new science of social psychology. Gordon Allport’s The Nature of Prejudice (1954) was both the defining text of this field and its most enduringly influential synthesis. In spite of numerous theoretical and terminological alternatives, ‘prejudice’ has remained prominent. The long-standing treatment of women as subordinates to men, usually termed sexism or misogyny, has been sometimes subsumed within the overall category of prejudice. As an increasing range of groups make collective claims for equal treatment, homophobia, fat prejudice, ableism, mental illness stigma and ageism have all become objects of study for social and political psychology (Nelson, 2009). In this chapter, we will be using the terms discrimination to designate the unfair treatment of certain groups (e.g. employers’ reluctance to hire ethnic minority individuals) and stereotypes to describe persistent overgeneralisations about groups (e.g. the belief that women are inherently nurturing). Overall, terminological nuances and disputes are beyond the scope of this chapter (for a discussion, see Dovidio et al., 2010). We aim to review and evaluate the attempts of social and political psychology to make sense of conflicts based on group identity.

Keywords

European Union Stereotype Threat Social Dominance Orientation Sexual Prejudice Mental Illness Stigma 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACCEPT (2005) Bariere sociale în viaţa persoanelor LGBT [Social Barriers in the Lives of LGBT Persons]. Bucharest: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Achebe, C. (1977) ‘An image of Africa: Racism in Conrad’s “Heart of Darkness”’. Massachusetts Review, 18: 782–794.Google Scholar
  3. Achim, V. (2004) The Roma in Romanian History. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
  4. Adam, B. D. (1998) ‘Theorizing homophobia’. Sexualities, 1(4): 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. and Sanford, R. N. (1950) The Authoritarian Personality. Oxford: Harpers.Google Scholar
  6. Allport, G. W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Oxford: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  7. Altemeyer, R. (1981) Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
  8. Altemeyer, R. (2006) The Authoritarians. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
  9. Amenta, E., Caren, N., Chiarello, E. and Su, Y. (2010) ‘The political consequences of social movements’. Annual Review of Sociology, 36: 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barron, L. G. and Hebl, M. (2012) ‘The force of law: The effects of sexual orientation antidiscrimination legislation on interpersonal discrimination in employment’. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(2): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bartof, S. E. (2010) Discrimination and Distress in Romanian Gay Men. MA dissertation. Cluj-Napoca: Babef-Bolyai University.Google Scholar
  12. Bartof, S. E., Balf, M. A. and Berger, I. (2013) ‘Since Trajan and Decebalus: Online media reporting of the 2010 GayFest in Bucharest’. Psychology and Sexuality, doi: 10.1080/19419899.2013.784211.Google Scholar
  13. Bartoş, S. E., Berger, I. and Hegarty, P. (2014) ‘Interventions to Reduce Sexual Prejudice: A Study-Space Analysis and Meta-Analytic Review’. Journal of Sex Research, 51(4): 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beauvoir, S. (1949) Le Deuxième sexe [The Second Sex]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  15. Billig, M. (1991) Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  16. Bruckmüller, S., Hegarty, P. and Abele, A. E. (2012) ‘Framing gender differences: Linguistic normativity affects perceptions of power and gender stereotypes’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2): 210–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cernat, V. (2011) ‘Extended contact effects: Is exposure to positive outgroup exemplars sufficient or is interaction with ingroup members necessary?’. Journal of Social Psychology, 151(6): 737–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, V. (2002) ‘Resistance and Normalization in the Construction of Lesbian and Gay Families: A Discursive Analysis’. In: Coyle, A. and Kitzinger, C. eds. Lesbian and Gay Psychology: New Perspectives. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Cochran, S. D. (2001) ‘Emerging issues in research on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does sexual orientation really matter?’. American Psychologist, 56(11): 931–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Creteanu, A. and Coman, A. (1998) Homosexualitatea în presa scrisă din România [Homosexuality in the Written Press of Romania]. Available from: http://accept.ong.ro/presarom.html.
  21. Crisp, R. J. and Hewstone, M. (2007) ‘Multiple social categorization’. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39: 163–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crosby, F. J., Iyer, A. and Sincharoen, S. (2006) ‘Understanding affirmative action’. Annual Review of Psychology, 57: 585–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Danziger, K. (1997) Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found Its Language. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  24. Dion, K. L. (2003) ‘Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination’. In: Millon, T. and Lerner, M. J. eds. Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  25. Dovidio, J., Hewstone, M., Glick, P. and Esses, V. (2010) ‘Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination: Theoretical and Empirical Overview’. In: Dovidio, J., Hewstone, M., Glick, P. and Esses, V. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  26. Duckitt, J. (2010) ‘Historical Overview’. In: Dovidio, J., Hewstone, M., Glick, P. and Esses, V. eds. The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  27. Eagly, A. H. and Steffen, V. J. (1986) ‘Gender stereotypes, occupational roles, and beliefs about part-time employees’. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10(3): 252–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Equality and Human Rights Commission (2012) Making Fair Financial Decisions: An Assessment of HM Treasury’s 2010 Spending Review Conducted under Section 31 of the 2006 Equality Act. Available from: http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/Inquiries/s31_final.pdf.
  29. European Commission (2012) Progress on Equality between Women and Men in 2011. Brussels: Author.Google Scholar
  30. Foucault, M. (1976) L’Histoire de la sexualité [The History of Sexuality]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  31. Foucault, M. (2009) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Friedan, B. (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  33. Fromm, E. (1965) Escape from Freedom. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  34. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J. and Pomare, M. (1990) ‘How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias?’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4): 692–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giugni, M. G. (1998) ‘Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements’. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Gough, B. (2002) ‘“I’ve Always Tolerated It But…”: Heterosexual Masculinity and the Discursive Reproduction of Homophobia’. In: Coyle, A. and Kitzinger, C. eds. Lesbian and Gay Psychology: New Perspectives. Oxford: BPS Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. and Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) ‘Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6): 1464–1480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haney, C., Banks, C. and Zimbardo, P. (1973) ‘Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison’. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1(1): 69–97.Google Scholar
  40. Harris, L. T. and Fiske, S. T. (2006) ‘Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme outgroups’. Psychological Science, 17(10): 847–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haslam, S. A. and Ryan, M. K. (2008) ‘The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived auitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations’. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5): 530–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., McLaughlin, K. A., Keyes, K. M. and Hasin, D. S. (2010) ‘The impact of institutional discrimination on psychiatric disorders in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: A prospective study’. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3): 452–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. and Dovidio, J. (2009) ‘How does stigma get under the skin? The mediating role of emotion regulation’. Psychological Science, 20(10): 1282–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Houghton, D. P. (2009) Political Psychology: Situations, Individuals, and Cases. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Hovland, C. I. and Sears, R. R. (1940) ‘Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices’. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 9: 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Inglehart, R. and Baker, W. E. (2000) ‘Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values’. American Sociological Review, 65(1): 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Inglehart, R. F. (2008) ‘Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006’. West European Politics, 31(1–2): 130–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. INSOMAR (2009) Fenomenul discriminării în România: Perceppii şi atitudini [The Discrimination Phenomenon in Romania: Perceptions and Attitudes]. Bucharest: Author.Google Scholar
  49. Institutul pentru Politici Publice (2003) Intoleranţă, discriminare, extremism. România 2003 [Intolerance, Discrimination, Extremism. Romania 2003]. Bucharest: Author. Available from: http://www.ipp.ro/old/altemateriale/Intoleranta%20Discriminare%20Extremism%20Romania%202003.pdf.Google Scholar
  50. Jaucourt, L. (1765) ‘Préjugé’ [Prejudice]. In: Diderot, D. and D’Alembert, J. eds. Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers [Encyclopaedia or Rational Dictionary of the Sciences, Arts, and Crafts]. Paris: André le Breton et al. Available from: http://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/L%E2%80%99Encyclop%C3%A9die/Volume_13#PR.C3.89JUG.C3.89.Google Scholar
  51. Jones, F. L. (1997) ‘Ethnic diversity and national identity’. Journal of Sociology, 33(3): 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kitzinger, C. (1987) The Social Construction of Lesbianism. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  53. Kleiner, B. (1998) ‘Whatever: Its use in pseudo-argument’. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(5): 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leyens, J.-P., Rodriguez-Perez, A., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R., Paladino, M.-P., Vaes, J. and Demoulin, S. (2001) ‘Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31: 395–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marcu, A. M. (2007) Dehumanization of Ethnic Groups in Britain and Romania: Socio-Cognitive and Ideological Aspects. PhD Thesis. Guildford, UK: University of Surrey.Google Scholar
  56. McConaghy, J. (1983) ‘Modern Racism, Ambivalence and the Modern Racism Scale’. In: Dovidio, J. and Gaertner, S. L. eds. Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism: Theory and Research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Metcalf, H. (2009) Paygap across the Equality Strands: A Review. Manchester: NIESR.Google Scholar
  58. Meyer, I. H. (1995) ‘Minority stress and mental health in gay men’. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36(1): 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Milgram, S. (1963) ‘Behavioral study of obedience’. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4): 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mogosf, A. (2009) Réalités sociales médiatisées: représentations sociales des Roumains dans la presse écrite française [Mediated Social Realities: Social Representations of Romanians in the French Written Press]. PhD Thesis. Paris: Université Paris-8 Vincennes-Saint Denis. Available from: http://Lstatic.e-corpus.org/download/notice_file/1098665/MogosThese.pdf.Google Scholar
  61. Monroe, K. R., Hankin, J. and Van Vechten, R. B. (2000) ‘The psychological foundations of identity politics’. Annual Review of Political Science, 3: 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Monteith, M. J., Deneen, N. E. and Tooman, G. D. (1996) ‘The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and blacks’. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(3): 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moraru, A. (2010) ‘Social perception of homosexuality in Romania’. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5: 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morrison, A. M. and von Glinow, M. (1990) ‘Women and minorities in management’. American Psychologist, 45(2): 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Morrison, M. A. and Morrison, T. G. (2002) ‘Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women’. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2): 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nelson, T. D. ed. (2009) Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  67. Oprea, A. (2005) ‘The arranged marriage of Ana Maria Cioaba, intra-community oppression and Romani feminist ideals: Transcending the “primitive culture” argument’. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(2): 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Paluck, E. L. and Green, D. P. (2009) ‘Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice’. Annual Review of Psychology, 60: 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Paolini, S., Harwood, J. and Rubin, M. (2010) ‘Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures’. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12): 1723–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parker, I. (2004) Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Pascoe, E. A. and Richman, L. S. (2009) ‘Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review’. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4): 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peel, E. (2001) ‘Mundane heterosexism: Understanding incidents of the everyday’. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(5): 541–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pettigrew, T. F. and Tropp, L. R. (2006) ‘A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5): 751–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U. and Christ, O. (2011) ‘Recent advances in intergroup contact theory’. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3): 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  76. Rodrîguez-Pérez, A., Delgado-Rodríguez, N., Betancor-Rodríguez, V., Leyens, J.-P. and Vaes, J. (2011) ‘Infra-humanization of outgroups throughout the world. The role of similarity, intergroup friendship, knowledge of the outgroup, and status’. Anales de Psicologia, 27(3): 679–687.Google Scholar
  77. Sartre, J.-P. (1960) Critique de la raison dialectique [The Critique of Dialectical Reason]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  78. Saucier, D. A., Miller, C. T. and Doucet, N. (2005) ‘Differences in helping whites and blacks: A meta-analysis’. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(1): 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sedgwick, E. K. (1994) Tendencies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schein, V. E. (1973) ‘The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(2): 95–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, R. H. and Sherif, C. W. (1954) Intergroup Conflict and Cooperation: The Robbers Cave Experiment. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Sibley, C. G. and Duckitt, J. (2008) ‘Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review’. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3): 248–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sidanius, J. and Pratto, F. (1999) Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M. and Quinn, D. M. (1999) ‘Stereotype threat and women’s math performance’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1): 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Spineanu-Dobrota, S. (2005) Homosexualitatea între normal şi patologic [Homosexuality between Normality and Pathology]. Bucharest: Tritonic.Google Scholar
  86. Stainton-Rogers, W. (2003) Social Psychology: Experimental and Critical Approaches. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Staub, E. (1989) The Roots of Evil: The Origins of Genocide and Other Group Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Steele, C. M. and Aronson, J. (1995) ‘Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5): 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Stephan, W. G. and Stephan, C. W. (1985) ‘Intergroup Anxiety’. Journal of Social Issues, 41(3): 157–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stephan, W. G. and Stephan, C. W. (2000) ‘An Integrated Threat Theory of Prejudice’. In: Oskamp, S. ed. Reducing Prejudice and Discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  91. Stoler, A. L. (1995) Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault’s History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Swim, J. K. (1994) ‘Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1): 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Swim, J. K. and Stangor, C. (1998) Prejudice: The Target’s Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  94. Tajfel, H. (1970) ‘Experiments in intergroup discrimination’. Scientific American, 223: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. (1986) ‘The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior’. In: Worchel, S. and Austin, W. G. eds. Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  96. Tileagă, C. (2005) ‘Accounting for extreme prejudice and legitimating blame in talk about the Romanies’. Discourse and Society, 16(5): 603–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. van Dijk, T. A. (1992) ‘Discourse and the denial of racism’. Discourse and Society, 3(1): 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wetherell, M. (1998) ‘Positioning and interpretive repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue’. Discourse and Society, 9: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Williams, C. L. (1992) ‘The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the “Female” Professions’. Social Problems, 39(3): 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Williams, D. R., Neighbors, H. W. and Jackson, J. S. (2003) ‘Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: Findings from community studies’. American Journal of Public Health, 93(2): 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Woodcock, S. (2009) ‘Gay pride as violent containment in Romania: A brave new Europe’. Sextures, 1(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
  103. World Health Organization (2001) Health and Freedom from Discrimination. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar
  104. World Health Organization (2009) Women and Health: Today’s Evidence Tomorrow’s Agenda. Geneva: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sebastian E. Bartoş and Peter Hegarty 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian E. Bartoş
  • Peter Hegarty

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations