Skip to main content

I Hereby Find You Guilty of Cheating: How Television Judges Give Personal Problems Legal Dimensions

  • Chapter
Intersections of Law and Culture

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore how legal consciousness may be influenced by television court shows. I try to bridge a gap between studies in the humanities and socio-legal studies as I account for some theories about why people go to court, and attempt to answer the question of whether television courts work as motivating factors for people to turn to address specific problems.

Many thanks to Sara Steinert Borella, Priska Gisler and Caroline Wiedmer for their helpful comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Conley, J M and W M O’Barr (1998) Just Words, Law, Language, and Power ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, L (2009) ‘Emotional Tropes in the Courtroom: On Representation of Affect and Emotion in Legal Court Proceedings’ 21 Nordic Theatre Studies 129–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewick, P and S S Silbey, (1992) ‘Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness’ 26(3) New England Law Review 731–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M ( 1992 [1979]) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court ( New York: Russell Sage )

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P (1987) Legal Discourse: Studies in Linguistics, Rhetoric and Legal Analysis ( London/New York: Macmillan and St Martin’s Press )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich, P (1990) Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks ( London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson )

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrick, J (2006) ‘Everyone’s an Expert: The CSI Effect’s Negative Impact on Juries’ (autumn) The Triple Helix

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, P Z (2005) ‘Syndi-Court Justice: Judge Judy and Exploitation of Arbitration’ 4(1)Journal of American Arbititration

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, E (2007) ‘The Reality of Courtroom Television Shows: Should the Model Code of Judicial Conduct Apply to TV Judges?’ (summer) Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 779–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S (1979) ‘Going to Court: Strategies of Dispute Management in an American Urban Neighborhood’ 13(4) Law and Society Review 891–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J (2005) ‘Law, Literature and the Vanishing Reel: On the Future of an Interdisciplinary Illusion’ 112(2) (March) PMLA 442–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porsdam, H (1999) Legally Speaking, Contemporary American Culture and the Law ( Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Richland, J B (2005) ‘What are You Going to Do with the Village’s Knowledge? Talking Tradition, Talking Law in Hopi Tribal Court’ 39 Law and Society Review 235–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richland, J B (2008) Arguing with Tradition: The Language of Law in Hopi Tribal Court ( Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press )

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A and J Simon (eds) (2003) Cultural Analysis, Cultural Studies, and the Law: Moving Beyond Legal Realism ( Durham, NC: Duke University Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwin, R S (2000) When Law Goes Pop: The Vanishing Line Between Law and Popular Culture ( Chicago: Chicago University Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, S (2005) ‘After Legal Consciousness’ 1 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 323–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanase, T (1995) ‘The Management of Disputes: Automobile Accident Compensation in Japan’ in R Abel (ed.), Law and Society Reader ( New York: New York University Press )

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, R (2003) Everybody’s Guide to Small Claims Court in California ( Berkeley, CA: Nolo )

    Google Scholar 

Television shows

  • Divorce Court, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, 1999–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge Greg Mathis (17 May 2007, 16 December 2007) Blackpearl Productions, 1999–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge Joe Brown, CBS Paramount Television, 1998–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge Judy (2008) ‘Davenport vs Filkin’, Judge Judy, Second to None (DVD), CBS Paramount Television, 1996–2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Larry King Live, ‘TV Judges Take their Stands’ (18 January 2000, 9 pm) CNN, 1985–2010

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Anna Krakus

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krakus, A. (2012). I Hereby Find You Guilty of Cheating: How Television Judges Give Personal Problems Legal Dimensions. In: Gisler, P., Borella, S.S., Wiedmer, C. (eds) Intersections of Law and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-28500-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics