Advertisement

Associations and Social Capital

  • Jan W. van Deth
  • Bob Edwards
  • Gabriel B˘adescu
  • Alisa Moldavanova
  • Michael Woolcock

Abstract

Associations provide institutionalized opportunities for social exchange and the strengthening of pro-social attitudes and social skills. Social capital – such as trust, norms, and networks – is a by-product of associational involvement. In trustful relationships transaction costs are decreased for all participants because fewer resources are required for compliance. In this way, social capital provides an attractive solution to the collective-good dilemma. The causal relation between associational involvement and social capital is mainly explained by learning processes. Positive effects are especially expected from bridging social capital based on involvement in heterogeneous networks that reinforce tolerance, openness, and outer-directedness. Bonding social capital in homogenous networks strengthens feelings of exclusivity and inner-directedness. Increasingly, attention is drawn to feasible dark sides of and to modes of negative social capital.

Besides, the expectation that social capital will have pro-social functions implies an implicit ideological baggage that undermines its utility as an analytical concept.

Keywords

Social Capital Civil Society Civic Engagement Social Trust Voluntary Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aasland, Aadne, Ase Bent Grodeland, and Heiko Pleines. 2012. “Trust and Informal Practice Among Elites in East Central Europe, South East Europe and the West Balkans.” Europe-Asia Studies 64(1):115–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, Frane. 2008. “Mapping Social Capital Across Europe: Findings, Trends and Methodological Shortcomings of Cross-National Surveys.” Social Science Information 47(2):159–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, Alberto, Edward Glaeser, and Bruce Sacerdote. 2001. Why Doesn’t the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State? Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, Lisa. 2011. “Demystifying the Arab Spring: Parsing the Differences in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.” Foreign Affairs 90(3):2–7Google Scholar
  5. Barber, Benjamin R. 1995. Jihad Vs. Mcworld. New York: Times BooksGoogle Scholar
  6. Bebbington, Anthony, Michael Woolcock, Scott Guggenheim, and Elizabeth Olson, eds. 2006. The Search for Empowerment: Social Capital as Idea and Practice at the World Bank. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Bimber, Bruce, Cynthia Stohl, and Andrew J. Flanagin. 2008. “Technological Change and the Shifting Nature of Political Organization.” Pp. 72–85 in Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics, edited by A. Chadwick and P. N. Howard. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulianne, Shelley. 2009. “Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research.” Political Communication 26(2):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241–258 in Handbook of Theoty and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson. New York: Greenwood PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Burt, Ronald S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Coffé, Hilde, and Benny Geys. 2007. “Toward an Empirical Characterization of Bridging and Bonding Social Capital.” Nonprofit and Voluntaty Sector Quarterly 36(1):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, Jean L., and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theoty. Boston: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, James S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94:S95—S120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theoty. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Dekker, Paul, Ruud Koopmans, and Andries van den Broek. 1997. “Voluntary Associations, Social Movements and Individual Political Behaviour in Western Europe.” Pp. 221–239 in Private Groups and Public Life. Social Participation, Voluntaty Associations and Political Involvement in Representative Democracies, edited by J. W. van Deth. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Diani, Mario, and Doug McAdam, eds. 2003. Social Movements and Networks. Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Dudwick, Nora, Kathleen Kuehnast, Veronica Nyhan Jones, and Michael Woolcock. 2006. Analyzing Social Capital in Context. A Guide to Using Qualitative Methods and Data. Washington, DC: World Bank InstituteGoogle Scholar
  18. Easterly, William, Jozef Ritzen, and Michael Woolcock. 2006. “Social Cohesion, Institutions, and Growth.” Economics & Politics 18(2):103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edwards, Bob, and Michael W. Foley. 1997. “The Political Economy of Our Discontent.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(5):669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards, Bob, and Michael W. Foley. 1998. “Civil Society and Social Capital Beyond Putnam.” American Behavioral Scientist 42(1):124–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Edwards, Bob, Michael W. Foley, and Mario Diani, eds. 2001. Beyond Tocqueville. Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective. Hannover, NH: University Press of New EnglandGoogle Scholar
  22. Edwards, Michael, ed. 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Civil Society. Oxford, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Encarnación, Omar G. 2003. The Myth of Civil Society: Social Capital and Democratic Consolidation in Spain and Brazil. Houndmills: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  24. Esser, Hartmut. 2008. “The Two Meanings of Social Capital.” Pp. 22–49 in The Handbook of Social Capital, edited by D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, and G. Wolleb. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans, Peter. 1996. “Government Action, Social Capital and Development: Reviewing the Evidence on Synergy.” World Development 24(6):1119–1132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans, Sara M., and Harry C. Boyte. 1992. Free Spaces: The Sources of Democratic Change in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Fennema, Meindert, and Jean Tilly. 2005. “Civil Communities and Multicultural Democracy.” Pp. 219–236 in Democracy and the Role of Associations: Political, Organizational and Social Context, edited by S. Rateutscher. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Ferragina, Emanuele. 2012. Social Capital in Europe. A Comparative Regional Analysis. Cheltenham, UK: Edward ElgarGoogle Scholar
  29. Fine, Ben. 2003. “Social Capital: The World Bank’s Fungible Friend.” Journal of Agrarian Change 3(4):586–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fine, Ben. 2010. Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly. London: Pluto PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1996. “The Paradox of Civil Society.” Journal of Democracy 7(3):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1997. “Editors’ Introduction: Escape from Politics? Social Theory and the Social Capital Debate.” American Behavioral Scientist 40(5):550–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Foley, Michael W., and Bob Edwards. 1999. “Is It Time to Disinvest in Social Capital?” Journal of Public Policy 19(2):141–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freitag, Markus. 2003. “Social Capital in (Dis)Similar Democracies: The Development of Generalized Trust in Japan and Switzerland.” Comparative Political Studies 36(8):936–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Freitag, Markus, and Marc Bilhlmann. 2009. “Crafting Trust: The Role of Political Institutions in a Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Political Studies 42(12):1537–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Gesthuizen, Maurice, Peer Scheepers, William Veld, and Beate Völker. 2013. “Structural Aspects of Social Capital: Tests for Cross-National Equivalence in Europe.” Quality & Quantity 47(2):909–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Geys, Benny. 2012. “Association Membership and Generalized Trust: Are Connections Between Associations Losing Their Value?” Journal of Civil Society 8(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Giddens, Anthony. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge, UK: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6):1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Grimes, Marcia. 2012. “The Contingencies of Societal Accountability: Examining the Link Between Civil Society and Good Government.” Studies in Comparative International Development:1–23Google Scholar
  42. Halpern, David. 2005. Social Capital. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Hanifan, L. J. 1916. “The Rural School Community Center.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 67:130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hooghe, Marc, and Ellen Quintelier. 2013. “Do All Associations Lead to Lower Levels of Ethnocentrism? A Two-Year Longitudinal Test of the Selection and Adaptation Model.” Political Behavior 35(2):289–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Howard, Marc M. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Howard, Marc Morje, and Leah Gilbert. 2008. “A Cross-National Comparison of the Internal Effects of Participation in Voluntary Organizations.” Political Studies 56(1):12–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jordan, Grant, and William A. Maloney. 1997. The Protest Business: Mobilizing Campaign Groups. Manchester, UK: Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
  48. Jordan, Grant, and William A. Maloney. 2007. Democracy and Interest Groups: Enhancing Participation? London: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaminska, Monika Ewa. 2010. “Bonding Social Capital in a Postcommunist Region.” American Behavioral Scientist 53(5): 758–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Karklins, Rasma. 2002. “Typology of Post-Communist Corruption.” Problems of Post-Communism 49(4):22–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Keane, John. 1998. Civil Society: Old Images, New Visions. Cambridge: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  52. Knack, Stephen, and Philip Keefer. 1997. “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4):1251–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kopecky, Petr and Cass Mudde, eds. 2012. Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  54. La Due Lake, Ronald, and Robert Huckfeldt. 1998. “Social Capital, Social Networks and Political Participation.” Political Psychology 19(3):567–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lasinska, Katarzyna. 2013. Social Capital in Eastern Europe: Poland an Exception? Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  56. Lemann, Nicholas. 1996. “Kicking in Groups.” The Atlantic Monthly 277(4):22–26Google Scholar
  57. Letki, Nathalia, and Goeffrey Evans. 2005. “Endogenizing Social Trust: Democratization in East-Central Europe.” British Journal of Political Science 35(03):515–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Levi, Margaret. 1996. “Social and Unsocial Capital: A Review Essay of Robert Putnam’s Making Democracy Work.” Politics & Society 24(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li, Yaojun, Mike Savage, and Andrew Pickles. 2003. “Social Change, Friendship and Civic Participation.” Sociological Research Online 8(4). Retrieved: 15/12/2012Google Scholar
  60. Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital. A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  61. Lin, Nan, and Bonnie Erickson, eds. 2008. Social Capital: An International Research Program. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  62. Maloney, William. 2012. “The Democratic Contribution to Professionalized Representation.” Pp. 84–96 in New Participation Dimensions in Civil Society. Professionalization and Individual Collective Action, edited by J. W. van Deth and W. Maloney. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  63. Maloney, William A., and Jan W. van Deth. 2010a. Civil Society and Activism in Europe: Contextualizing Engagement and Political Orientations. London; New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  64. Maloney, William A., and Jan W. van Deth. 2010b. “Conclusion: Activists, Active People, and Citizens in European Communities.” Pp. 231–241 in Civil Society and Activism in Europe: Contextualizing Engagement and Political Orientations, edited by W. A. Maloney and J. W. van Deth. London. New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Maloney, William A., and Sigrid Rossteutscher, eds. 2007. Social Capital and Associations in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  66. Mascherini, Massimiliano, Daniele Vidoni, and Anna Rita Manca. 2011. “Exploring the Determinants of Civil Participation in 14 European Countries: One-Size-Fits None.” European Sociological Review 27(6):790–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meulemann, Heiner, ed. 2008. Social Capital in Europe: Similarity of Countries and Diversity of People? Multi-Level Analyses of the European Social Survey 2002. Leiden, Boston: BrillGoogle Scholar
  68. Morales, Laura, and Peter Geurts. 2007. “Associational Involvement.” Pp. 135–157 in Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis, edited by J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, and A. Westholm. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Morales, Laura. 2009. Joining Political Organizations: Institutions, Mobilization, and Participation in Western Democracies. Colchester, UK: ECPR PressGoogle Scholar
  70. Morales, Laura, and Marco Giugni, eds. 2011. Social Capital, Political Participation and Migration in Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  71. Mouw, Ted. 2006. “Estimating the Causal Effect of Social Capital: A Review of Recent Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 32(1):79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Neckerman, Kathryn M., ed. 2004. Social Inequality. New York: Russell Sage FoundationGoogle Scholar
  73. Offe, Claus. 1999. “How Can We Trust Our Fellow Citizens?” Pp. 42-87 in Democracy and Trust, edited by M. E. Warren. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  74. Oldenburg, Ray. 1999. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Bookstores, Bars, Hair Salons, and Other Hangouts at the Heart of a Community. New York: MarlowGoogle Scholar
  75. Paldam, Martin. 2000. “Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement.” Journal of Economic Surveys 14(5):629–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Paxton, Pamela. 2002. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” American Sociological Review 67:27–49Google Scholar
  77. Peerenboom, Randall. 2007. China Modernizes: Threat to the West or Model for the Rest? Oxford, New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  78. Petrova, Tsveta. 2011. “Citizen Participation in Local Governance in Eastern Europe: Rediscovering a Strength of Civil Society in the Post-Socialist World?” Europe-Asia Studies 63(5):757–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pichler, Florian, and Claire Wallace. 2007. “Patterns of Formal and Informal Social Capital in Europe.” European Sociological Review 23(4):423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Plagnol, Anke C., and Felicia A. Huppert. 2010. “Happy to Help? Exploring the Factors Associated with Variations in Rates of Volunteering across Europe.” Social Indicators Research 97(2):157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Polletta, Francesca. 2005. “How Participatory Democracy Became White: Culture and Organizational Choice.” Mobilization 10(2):271–288Google Scholar
  82. Portes, Alejandro. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  84. Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6:65–78Google Scholar
  85. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and SchusterGoogle Scholar
  86. Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century: The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30(2):137–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rose, Richard, William Mishler, and Christian Haerpfer. 1998. Democracy and Its Alternatives: Understanding Post-Communist Societies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University PressGoogle Scholar
  88. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2001. “Trust and Honesty in Post-Socialist Societies.” Kyklos 54(2-3):415–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rossteutscher, Sigrid. 2008. “Social Capital and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Perspective.” Pp. 208–240 in The Handbook of Social Capital, edited by D. Castiglione, J. W. van Deth, and G. Wolleb. Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  90. Rothstein, Bo, and Dietlind Stolle. 2008. “The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust.” Comparative Politics 40(4):441–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rothstein, Bo, and Eric M. Uslaner. 2005. “All for One: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust.” World Politics 58(1):41–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Salamon, Lester M. 2003. The Resilient Sector. The State of Nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution PressGoogle Scholar
  93. Sampson, Steven. 2002. “‘Trouble Spots’ - Projects, Bandits, and State Fragmentation.” Pp. 309–342 in Globalization, the State, and Violence, edited by J. Friedman. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira PressGoogle Scholar
  94. Sandholtz, Wayne, and Rein Taagepera. 2005. “Corruption, Culture, and Communism.” International Review of Sociology 15(1):109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Schofer, Evan, and Wesley Longhofer. 2011. “The Structural Sources of Association.” American Journal of Sociology 117(2):539–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Serageldin, Ismail, and Christiaan Grootaert. 2000. “Defining Social Capital: An Integrating View.” Pp. 40–58 in Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective, edited by P. Dasgupta and I. Serageldin. Washington, DC: The World BankGoogle Scholar
  97. Siisiainen, Martti. 2000. “Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu Vs. Putnam.” Paper presented at the ISTR Fourth International Conference, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
  98. Silitski, Vitali. 2007. “Different Authoritarianisms, Distinct Patterns of Electoral Change.” Pp. 155-174 in Reclaiming Democracy. Civil Society and Electoral Change in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by J. Forbrig and P. Dem& Washington, DC: The German Marshall Fund of the United StatesGoogle Scholar
  99. Sirianni, Carmen, and Lewis A. Friedland. 2001. Civic Innovation in America: Community Empowerment, Public Policy and the Movement for Civic Renewal. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  100. Skocpol, Theda. 2004. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma PressGoogle Scholar
  101. Smith, David H. 2012. “Negative Social Capital and Deviant Voluntary Associations.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Department of Sociology, Boston College. Unpublished PaperGoogle Scholar
  102. Smith, David H., with Sharon Eng and Kelly Albertson. 2017. “The Darker Side of Philanthropy: How Self-Interest and Incompetence Can Overcome a Love of Mankind and Serving the Public Interest.” Pp. 273–286 in The Routledge Companion to Philanthropy, edited by T. Jung, S. Phillips, and J. Harrow. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  103. Smith, David H., and John P. Robinson. 2017. “Data Contradicting Putnam’s Two Participation Decline Theses: Recent Volunteering and Membership Rates and Trends in North America and Elsewhere.” Chestnut Hill, MA: Department of Sociology, Boston College. Unpublished Paper Submitted for Editorial ReviewGoogle Scholar
  104. Smith, David H, and Ce Shen. 2002. “The Roots of Civil Society: A Model of Voluntary Association Prevalence Applied to Data on Larger Contemporary Nations.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43(2):93–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stolle, Dietlind, and Allison Harell. 2013. “Social Capital and Ethno-Racial Diversity: Learning to Trust in an Immigrant Society.” Political Studies 61(1):42–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Stolle, Dietlind, and Marc Hooghe. 2003. “Conclusion: The Sources of Social Capital Reconsidered.” Pp. 231–248 in Generating Social Capital, edited by D. Stolle and M. Hooghe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  107. Stolle, Dietlind, and Marc Hooghe. 2005. “Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The Debate About the Alleged Decline of Social Capital and Civic Engagement in Western Societies.” British Journal of Political Science 35(1):149–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stolle, Dietlind, and Thomas R. Rochon. 1998. “Are All Associations Alike?: Member Diversity, Associational Type, and the Creation of Social Capital.” American Behavioral Scientist 42(1):47–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Strömblad, Per, and Per Adman. 2010. “Political Integration through Ethnic or Nonethnic Voluntary Associations?” Political Research Quarterly 63(4):721–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sztompka, Piotr. 1998. “Trust, Distrust and Two Paradoxes of Democracy.” European Journal of Social Theory 1(1):19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Tocqueville, Alexis de. [1840] 1990. Democracy in America, Vol. II. New York: VintageGoogle Scholar
  112. Tsai, Lily L. 2007. Accountability Without Democracy: Solidary Groups and Public Goods Provision in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  113. Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  114. Uslaner, Eric M. 2011. “Trust, Diversity, and Segregation in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Comparative Sociology 10(2):221–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. van Deth, Jan W. 2003. “Measuring Social Capital: Orthodoxies and Continuing Contro-versies.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 6(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. van Deth, Jan W. 2008. “Political Involvement and Social Capital.” Pp. 191–218 in Social Capital in Europe: Similarity of Countries and Diversity of People? Multi-Level Analyses of the European Social Survey 2002, Vol. 16, edited by H. Meulemann. Leiden, Netherlands; Boston, MA: BrillGoogle Scholar
  117. van Deth, Jan W. 2010. “Participation in Voluntary Associations: Dark Shades in a Sunny World?” American Behavioral Scientist 53(5):640–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. van Deth, Jan W., and Frauke Kreuter. 1998. “Membership of Voluntary Associations.” Pp. 135–155 in Comparative Politics. The Problem of Equivalence, edited by J. W. van Deth. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  119. van Deth, Jan W., José Ramón Montero, and Anders Westholm, eds. 2007. Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  120. van Deth, Jan W., and Sonja Zmerli. 2010. “Introduction: Civicness, Equality, and Democracy: A Dark Side of Social Capital?” American Behavioral Scientist 53(5):631–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Van Ingen, Erik, and Matthijs Kalmijn. 2010. “Does Voluntary Association Participation Boost Social Resources?” Social Science Quarterly 91(2):493–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. van Oorschot, Wim, and Wil Arts. 2005. “The Social Capital of European Welfare States: The Crowding out Hypothesis Revisited.” Journal of European Social Policy 15(1):5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Varshney, Ashutosh. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar
  124. Walker, Edward T., John D. McCarthy, and Frank Baumgartner. 2011. “Replacing Members with Managers? Mutualism among Membership and Nonmembership Advocacy Organizations in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 116(4):1284–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wallace, Caire, Florian Pichler, and Christian Haerpfer. 2012. “Changing Patterns of Civil Society in Europe and America 1995–2005: Is Eastern Europe Different?” East European Politics & Societies 26(1):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Warren, Mark E. 2001. Democracy and Association. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  127. Wilkinson, Richard G., and Kate Pickett. 2009. The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. New York: Bloomsbury PressGoogle Scholar
  128. Wollebk, Dag, and Kristin Stromsnes. 2008. “Voluntary Associations, Trust, and Civic Engagement: A Multilevel Approach.” Nonprofit and Voluntaty Sector Quarterly 37(2):249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Wollebk, Dag, and Per Selle. 2007. “Origins of Social Capital: Socialization and Institutionalization Approaches Compared.” Journal of Civil Society 3(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Wollebk, Dag, and Per Selle. 2012. “Commentary on Geys: Keeping It Simple — The Scope of Organizational Activity and Generalized Trust.” Journal of Civil Society 8(1):91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Woolcock, Michael. 2010. “The Rise and Routinization of Social Capital, 1988-2008.” Annual Review of Political Science 13:469–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Woolcock, Michael, and Deepa Narayan. 2000. “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy.” The World Bank Research Observer 15(2):225–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan W. van Deth
    • 1
  • Bob Edwards
    • 2
  • Gabriel B˘adescu
    • 3
  • Alisa Moldavanova
    • 4
  • Michael Woolcock
    • 5
  1. 1.The Netherlands
  2. 2.USA
  3. 3.Romania
  4. 4.Ukraine
  5. 5.Australia

Personalised recommendations