Through the Grapevine: Rulfo, Garro, and National Allegory

  • Enrico Mario Santí
Part of the New Directions in Latino American Cultures book series (NDLAC)

Abstract

My meditation on restitution as a critical practice evokes obvious conceptual corollaries, such as the twin issues with which it is associated most frequently in contemporary theoretical discussions. The first of these, nation studies, is historical, and concerns the ways in which cultural evidence is marshaled to describe the contents of a national imaginary, often buried or at least unattended. The role of the critic in such practice is to restitute cultural contents that play a role in discourses that either construct or undermine collective identities, such as those encompassed by the concept of nation. Yet clearly the gap between the original nature of those contents and its eventual critical restitution, its retrospective rendering, ought to be mediated by, or at least checked against, the primary evidence of the national archive. And, needless to say, such practice does not always work neatly in favor of encompassing all the identities that are in need of articulation. The other issue, allegory, which is rhetorical rather than historical, would seem to go to the heart of the restitutive will, in the sense that every allegorical interpretation, by its very definition and structure (allegory being literally the discourse of the other, albs agoueirein), attempts to translate one code or set of ciphers onto another, perhaps more accessible, set of signs. Thus allegorical reading would appear to be a primary restituting activity, as decipherment, subject to speculation or correct reading, remains a matter of constant slippage.

Keywords

Entropy Dust Posit Arena Ghost 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jameson’s statement is the subtitle to his influential The Political Unconscious (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1980). On the alleged primacy of narrative in historical understanding, see Hayden White, “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality,” and “The Question of Narrative in Contemporary Historical Theory,” in his The Content of the Form (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987), 1–57Google Scholar
  2. Michel de Certeau, The Writing of History, trans. Tom Conley (New York: Columbia University press, 1988)Google Scholar
  3. Dominick LaCapra, History, Politics and the Novel (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For basic bibliography and general introductions to these authors, the best I know are the entries by Luis Leal and Adriana Méndez Rodenas in Latin American Writers, ed. Carlos Sole and Klaus Muller-Bergh (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 2002), I, 1227Google Scholar
  5. Peter Beardsell, “Juan Rulfo: Pedro Pâramo” in Landmarks in Modern Latin American Fiction ed. Philip Swanson (London: Routledge, 1990), 74–95.Google Scholar
  6. Patricia Rosas Lopáegui, Testimonios sobre Elena Garro (Monterrey: Ediciones Castillo, 2002)Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    Patricia M. Spacks, Gossip (NewYork: Alfred Knopf, 1988).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Homi Bhabha, Nation and Narration (London: Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
  9. Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, revised edition (London: Verso, 1983)Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    See Doris Sommer, Foundational Fictions: The National Romances of Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See Aijaz Ahmad, “Jameson’s Rhetoric of Otherness,” in his In Theory: Classes, Nations, Literatures (LondomVerso, 1992), 95–122; and Jean Franco, “The Nation as Imagined Community,” in The New Historicism, ed. H. Arameeser (New York: Routledge, 1989), 204–212.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jean Franco, Plotting Women: Gender and Representation in Mexico (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), 131.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Among notable exceptions, see Daniel Balderston, “The New Historical Novel: History and Fantasy in Los recuerdos del porvenir,” Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, vol. LXVI (1989), 41–46Google Scholar
  14. Sharon Sieber, “Elena Garros New Synthesis: Epic and History in Los recuerdos del porvenir,” Selecta: Journal of the PNCFL, vol. 18 (1997), 101–111.Google Scholar
  15. 21.
    See Stanley Ross, ed., ¿muerto la revolucián mexicana? (Mexico City: Secretaría de Educación Publica, 1972).Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    See Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 15.Google Scholar
  17. Bernard Cowan, “The Nomos of Deleuze and Guattari: Emergent Holism in A Thousand Plateaus,” Annals of Scholarship, vol. 11, no. 3 (1997), 213–289.Google Scholar
  18. 26.
    Ross Chambers, Loiterature (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1999), 93.Google Scholar
  19. 29.
    I cite from Luis Harss, “Juan Rulfo, o la pena sin nombre,” Los nuestros (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana, 1966), 355.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    Mikhail Bakhtin, Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, tr. and ed. Caryl Emerson (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984), 7.Google Scholar
  21. 31.
    Jan Mukarovsky, “Detail as the Basic Semantic Unit in Folk Art,” in his The Word and Verbal Art, trans. John Burbank and Peter Steiner (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977), 202.Google Scholar
  22. 32.
    On this subject the best guide is Gilbert M. Joseph, ed., Fragments of a Golden Age: The Politics of Culture in Mexico since 1940 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  23. 33.
    Michel Foucault, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–, ed. and trans. Colin Gordon et al. (New ork: Pantheon Books, 1980), 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Enrico Mario Santí 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Mario Santí

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations