Introduction

  • Enrico Mario Santí
Part of the New Directions in Latino American Cultures book series (NDLAC)

Abstract

My favorite Borges poem of all time is La cifra, the title work of one of his last books (1981).The poem’s overt subject is the inconstant moon, about which Borges wrote so often throughout his career, perhaps as a response to Leopoldo Lugones, Borges’s famous precursor who, following Laforgue, had turned it into a staple of modern Hispanic poetics. But for this old poet, whose persona permeates the bulk of Borges’s late works, the poem is not so much about the moon as what the moon has meant poetically and paradoxically, being both present in memory and inconstant physically. It reads:

Keywords

Sugar Burning Dust Arena Argentina 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991), 48.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    See Robert Alter, The Pleasures of Reading in an Ideological Age (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1989), 15.Google Scholar
  3. George Steiner, “Text and Context,” in his On Difficulty and Other Essays (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978), 1–17.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    See Gayatri C. Spivak, A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Toward a History of the Vanishing Present (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    J.R. de J. Jackson, Historical Criticism and the Meaning of Texts (New York: Routledge, 1989), 39.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Katerina Clark and Michael Holquist, Mikhail Bakhtin (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1984), 207.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    Gayatri C. Spivak, “Can the Subaltern Speak?” in Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader, ed. Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 66–111Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    See, for example, Mabel Morana, “El Boom del subalterno,” Revista de cntica cultural, no. 14 (1996–1997), 48–53, and Hugo Achugar, “Leones, cazadores e historiadores: a propósito de las politicas de la memoria y del conocimiento,” Revista Iberoamericana, vol. LXIII, no. 180 (Julio-setiembre 1997), 379–387.Google Scholar
  9. John Beverley, Subalternity and Representation: Arguments in Cultural Theory (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999), 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 12.
    See Florencia Mallon, “The Promise and Dilemma of Subaltern Studies: Perspectives from Latin American History,” American Historical Review, vol. 99, no. 5 (1994), 1491–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 13.
    See Jerome J. McGann, The Beauty of Inflections. Literary Investigations in Historical Method and Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 131.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    See Hayden White, “Formalist and Contextualist Strategies in Historical Explanation,” in his Figurai Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 43–65.Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    See Peter Hitchcock, “The ‘Othering’ of Cultural Studies,” Third Text, 25 (1993–1994), 11–20.Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    Gareth Williams, “The Fantasies of Cultural Exchange in Latin American Subaltern Studies,” in The Real Thing: Testimonial Discourse and Latin America, ed. Georg M. Gugelberger (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996), 245.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    See K.L. Pike, Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of Human behavior (1954; The Hague: Mouton, 1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 19.
    In Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures. Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973), 20.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Eric Kline Silverman, “Clifford Geertz: Towards a More ‘Thick’ Understanding?” in Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics and Post-Structuralism, ed. Christopher Tilley (Oxford: B.Blackwell, 1990), 148.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    See, especially, Vincent P. Pecora, “The Limits of Local Knowledge,” in The New Historicism, ed. H. AramVeeser (New York: Routledge, 1989), 243–276Google Scholar
  19. Melford E. Spiro, “Cultural Relativism and the Future of Anthropology,” Cultural Anthropology, vol. 1, no. 3 (August 1986), 259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 24.
    See Jonathan Culler, On Deconstruction (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982), 128.Google Scholar
  21. Jacques Derrida, Limited Inc. (Evanston, 111.: Northwestern University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    Octavio Paz, Sorjuana, or The Traps of Faith (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1988), 471–473Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    Jonathan Culler, Roland Barthes (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983), 84.Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    Roland Barthes, “The Death of the Author,” in his Image, Music, Text, trans. Stephen Heath (New York: Hill and Wang, 1977), 147.Google Scholar
  25. Claude Bremond and Thomas Pavel, De Barthes à Balzac: Fictions d’une critique, critiques d’une fiction (Paris: Albin Michel, 1998).Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    Thus, “cipher, n. f[rom] Arab sifr. … 1 an arithmetic symbol, 0, of no value by itself, but used to occupy a vacant place in decimal etc. numeration, 2 a numeral; especially an Arabic numeral… 3 a secret or disguised system of writing.…,” The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, ed. Lesley Brown (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), vol. 1,402. For histories and speculations, see: Robert Kaplan, The Nothing That Is. A Natural History of Zero (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
  27. Graham Flegg, Numbers-.Their History and Meaning (New York: Schocken Books, 1983), 67–73Google Scholar
  28. John McLeish, Number (New York: Fawcett Columbine, 1992), 139–143Google Scholar
  29. Charles Seifel, Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea (New York: Viking Press, 1998), 74–81Google Scholar
  30. George Ifrah, From One to Zero: A Universal History of Numbers (New York: Viking, 1985), 473–483Google Scholar
  31. 33.
    See Paul Ricoeur, Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation, trans. Denis Savage (New Haven: ale University Press, 1970), 33–34.Google Scholar
  32. 34.
    See Doris Sommer, “Supplying Demand: Walt Whitman as the Liberal Self,” in Reinventing the Americas: Comparative Studies of Literature of the United States and Spanish America, ed. Bell Gale Chevigny and Gari Laguardia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), 68–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Enrico Mario Santí 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Mario Santí

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations