A Desalambrar: Unfencing Gender’s Place in Research on Latin America
  • Janise Hurtig
  • Rosario Montoya
  • Lessie Jo Frazier


This volume brings together recent work by feminist anthropologists of Latin America whose research addresses the interplay of gender, place, and power. As anthropologists, we find “place” to be a useful conceptual vehicle for emphasizing the cultural, social, and historical specificity of gender relations and ideologies. As feminists, we recognize the necessity of incorporating gender—understood as an axis of social power (McDowell 1999) and a category of analysis—to examine how specific places operate as sites of cultural production, institutional inequalities, or grassroots struggles. In other words, the chapters in this volume theorize specific social practices, cultural constructions, identify formations, and historical transformations through the inter-relationship of gender and place.


Participatory Action Research Gender Relation Gender Ideology Feminist Research Conceptual Vehicle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1990. “The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power in Bedouin Women.” American Ethnologist 17(1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behar, Ruth. 1993. Translated Woman: Crossing the Border with Esperanza’s Story. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Behar, Ruth. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  4. Castañeda, Jorge G. 1994. Utopia Unarmed: The Latin American Left after the Cold War. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  5. de Lauretis, Teresa. 1987. Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Desbiens, Caroline. 1999. “Feminism ‘in’ Geography: Elsewhere, Beyond and the Politics of Paradoxical Space.” Gender, Place, and Culture 6(2): 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Leonardo, Micaela. 1991. “Gender, Culture, and Political Economy: Feminist Anthropology in Historical Perspective.” In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge, edited by Micaela Di Leonardo. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1–48.Google Scholar
  8. Dirlik, Arif. 1996. “The Global in the Local.” In Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary, edited by Rob Wilson and Wimal Dissanayake. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eagleton, Terry. 1990. “Nationalism: Irony and Commitment.” In Nationalism, Colonialism, and Literature, essays by Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson, and Edward Said. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Egmond, Florike and Peter Mason. 1997. The Mammoth and the Mouse: Microhistory and Morphology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fisher, Jo. 1993. Out of the Shadows: Women, Resistance and Politics in South America. London: Latin America Bureau.Google Scholar
  12. Foley, Doug, Bradley Levinson, and Janise Hurtig. 2002. “Anthropology Goes Inside: The New Educational Ethnography of Ethnicity and Gender.” In Review of Research in Education, edited by Walter Secada. Washington, DC: AERA, 37–98.Google Scholar
  13. Fuller, Norma. 2001. “The Anthropology of Gender in South America.” American Anthropological Association Newsletter, May 16.Google Scholar
  14. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Harding, Sandra. 1987. “Introduction: Is There a Feminist Method?” In Feminism and Methodology, edited by Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Joseph, Gilbert and Daniel Nugent. 1994. Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modem Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lamas, Marta, ed. 1996. El género: La construcción cultural de la diferencia sexual. Mexico D.F.: Programa Universitario de Estudios de Género, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
  18. Marcus, George E. 1998. Ethnography in/of the World System: Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Massey, Doreen. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. McDowell, Linda. 1999. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  21. McNay, Lois. 2000. Gender and Agency: Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  22. Melhuus, Mark and Kristi Anne Stølen. 1996. Machos, Mistresses, Madonnas: Contesting the Power of Latin American Gender Imagery. London, Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Mies, Maria. 1983. “Toward a Methodology for Feminist Research.” In Theories of Women’s Studies, edited by Gloria Bowles and Renate Duelli Klein. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  24. Montecino, Sonia and María Elena Boiser, eds. 1993. Huellas: Seminario mujer y antropología. Santiago: CEDEM.Google Scholar
  25. Montecino, Sonia and Regina Rodríguez, eds. 1999. Espejosy travesías: Antropología y mujer en los 90, Ediciones de las Mujeres No. 16. Santiago: ISIS.Google Scholar
  26. Montes, Soledad Gonzalez, ed. 1990. Mujeres y relaciones de género en la antropología latinoamericana. Mexico D.E: El Colegio de Mexico.Google Scholar
  27. Nash, June. 1986. “A Decade of Research on Gender in Latin America.” In Women and Social Change in Latin America, edited by June Nash and Helen Safa. South Hadley: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  28. Ortner, Sherry. 1995. “Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratt, Geraldine. 1998. “Geographic Metaphors in Feminist Theory.” In Making Worlds: Gender, Metaphor, Materiality, edited by Susan Hardy Aiken, Ann Brigham, Sallie A. Marston, and Penny Waterstone. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 13–30.Google Scholar
  30. Radcliffe, Sarah and Sallie Westwood. 1993. “Viva”: Women and Popular Protest in Latin America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Reiter, Rayna. 1975. “Introduction.” In Toward an Anthropology of Women, edited by Rayna Reiter. New York: Monthly Review Press, 11–19.Google Scholar
  32. Rose, Gillian. 1993. Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  33. Stephen, Lynn. 1997. Women and Social Movements in Latin America: Power from Below. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  34. Strathern, Marilyn. 1987. “An Awkward Relationship: The Case of Feminism and Anthropology.” Signs, 12(3): 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Taussig, Michael. 1992. The Nervous System. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Taussig, Michael. 1997. The Magic of the State. New York: Roudedge.Google Scholar
  37. Tsing, Anna. 1994. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Tsing, Anna. 2000. “The Global Situation.” Cultural Anthropology 15(3): 327–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rosario Montoya, Lessie Jo Frazier, and Janise Hurtig 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janise Hurtig
  • Rosario Montoya
  • Lessie Jo Frazier

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations