Skip to main content

Experimental Trust

  • Chapter
Experience and Faith
  • 43 Accesses

Abstract

“We’ll finish an education sometime, won’t we?” asked Emily Dickinson of her friend Abiah Root on February 23, 1845, adding, “You may then be Plato, and I will be Socrates, provided you won’t be wiser than I am” (L 1:10). Thus, at fourteen, the schoolgirl showed herself to be philosophically precocious, by recognizing the distinction between Plato and the chief persona of his dialogues and by anticipating her own role as gadfly On October 10, 1851, she wrote to her brother, Austin, “I had a dissertation from Eliza Coleman a day or two ago—don’t know which was the author—Plato, or Socrates—rather think Jove had a finger in it” (L 1:147). Thus, at twenty, besides playing again with the contrast between Plato and Socrates, she expressed ambivalence about whether philosophy trumps theology and implied that, on occasion, it probably should.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Freeman Dyson, “A New Newton,” The New York Review of Books 50 (July 3, 2003): 4–6, esp. 6. See also James Gleick, Isaac Newton; and Brantley, Eocke, Wesley, and the Method of English Romanticism, 1–26, esp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael V DePorte, “Digressions and Madness in A Tale of a Tub and Tristram Shandy,” The Huntington Eibrary Quarterly 34 (November 1970): 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Derek Taylor, “Mary Astell’s Ironic Assault on John Locke’s Theory of Thinking Matter,” Journal of the History of Ideas 64 (2001): 505–22, esp. 505–07, 522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See also Taylor , “Clarissa Harlowe, Mary Astell, and Elizabeth Carter: John Norris of Bemerton’s Female ‘Descendants,’” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 12 (October 1999): 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. G. S. Rousseau,“John Wesley’s Primitive Physick (1747),” Harvard Library Bulletin 16 (July 1968): 242–56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Howells, “Rethinking the Titanic: Hubris, Nemesis and the Modern World,” Symbiosis: A Journal of Anglo-American Literary Relations 1.2 (October 1997): 151–58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick E O’Connell, “Emily Dickinson’s Train: Iron Horse or ‘Rough Beast,?’” American Literature 52.3 (November 1980): 469–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. William Freedman, “Dickinson’s ‘I like to see it lap the miles,’” The ExpUcator 40.3 (Spring 1982): 30–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Julia M.Walker, “Emily Dickinson’s Poetic of Private Liberation,” Dickinson Studies, no. 45 (June 1983): 17–22, esp. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Elisa New, “Difficult Writing, Difficult God: Emily Dickinson’s Poems beyond Circumference,” Religion and Literature 18.3 (Fall 1986): 1–27, esp. 6–7, 10, 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rowena Revis Jones, “‘A Royal Seal’: Emily Dickinson’s Rite of Baptism,” Religion and Literature 18.3 (Fall 1986): 29–51, esp. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Heather McClave, “Emily Dickinson: The Missing All,” Southern Humanities Review 14.1 (winter 1980): 1–12, esp. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard Gravil, “Emily Dickinson (and Walt Whitman): The Escape from ‘Locksley Hall,’” Symbiosis: A Journal of Anglo-American Literary Relations 7.1 (April 2003): 56–75, esp. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anthony Hecht, “The Riddles of Emily Dickinson,” New England Review 1.1 (Autumn 1978): 1–24, esp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lynn Keller and Cristanne Miller, “Emily Dickinson, Elizabeth Bishop, and the Rewards of Indirection,” New England Quarterly 57.4 (December 1984): 533–53, esp. 546–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lisa Paddock, “Metaphor as Reason: Emily Dickinson’s Approach to Nature,” Massachusetts Studies in English 7.4.–8.1 (1981): 70–79, esp. 71–72, 73, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jonnie G. Guerra, “Dickinson’s ‘A bird came down the walk,’” The Explicator 48.1 (fall 1989): 29–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Douglas Anderson, “Presence and Place in Emily Dickinson’s Poetry,” New England Quarterly 57.2 (June 1984): 205–24, esp. 221–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Miller Budick, “The Dangers of the Living Word: Aspects of Dickinson’s Epistemology, Cosmology, and Symbolism,” ESQ: A Journal of the American Renaissance 29 (4th quarter 1983): 208–24, esp. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Juhasz , “‘To Make a Prairie’: Language and Form in Emily Dickinson’s Poems about Mental Experience,” Ball State University Forum 21.2 (Spring 1980): 12–25, esp. 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Richard E. Brantley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brantley, R.E. (2004). Experimental Trust. In: Experience and Faith. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12209-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics