Early Christian Attitudes toward Work

  • Patricia Ranft
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


The importance of Genesis in the development of Christian attitudes toward work is hard to overestimate. It is in the Genesis creation narratives that the chief principles of the theology of work are rooted. First, in the P narrative work is identified as an activity proper to God. Second, work is an activity that God alternated with rest: “And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made: and he rested on the seventh day from all the work which he had done” (Gn 2 :2).1 Rest is such an important part of work that this aspect is commemorated in a mandatory day of rest: “And he blessed the seventh day, and sanctified it; because in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made” (Gn 2 :2–3). Such an emphasis on rest indicates that a sense of justice must accompany work for it to be divine in origin. A sabbath year is even proposed as a means of establishing justice among the Israelites: “Six years thou shalt sow thy ground, and shalt gather the corn thereof But the seventh year thou shalt let it alone, and suffer it to rest, that the poor of the people may eat” (Ex 23:10–11). In Deuteronomy the sabbath is seen as a means of establishing social and economic justice: “In the seventh year thou shalt make a remission.” (Dt 15:1). The justice that emanates from rest, therefore, can only come about in the first place by the presence of work, for rest is but a cessation of work.


Manual Labor Manual Work Eleventh Century Wool Yarn Secular World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Scripture citations are from the Douay-Rheims translation of Jerome’s Vulgate: The Holy Bible according to the Douay and Rhemish Versions with Complete Notes of the Rev. Geo. Leo Haydock (photo reproduction: Monrovia, CA: Catholic Treasures, 1992).Google Scholar
  2. 59.
    See Maria McCarthy, The Rule for Nuns of St. Caesarius of Arles (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  3. 61.
    Cassiodorus, Institutiones divinarum lectionum, cited in M. L. W. Laistner, Thought and Letters in Western Europe A. D. 500 to 900, rev. ed. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1976), p. 98–101.Google Scholar
  4. 62.
    Philip Timko, “Cassiodorus,” Encyclopedia of Monasticism, ed. William Johnston (Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 2000), 1:250.Google Scholar
  5. 65.
    PL 97, 381, cited in Bede Lackner, The Eleventh-Century Background of Cîteaux (Washington, DC: Cistercian Publications, 1972), p. 11.Google Scholar
  6. 68.
    Mumford , The Myth of the Machine: Technics and Human Development (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1966–67) p. 263.Google Scholar
  7. 69.
    Rosamond McKitterick, The Carolingians and the Written Word (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 109.Google Scholar
  8. See also Janet Nelson, “Literacy in Carolingian government,” in The Uses of Literacy in Early Medieval Europe, ed. Rosamond McKitterick (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 258–96.Google Scholar
  9. 72.
    Kenneth Conant, “Observations on the Practical Talents and Technology of the Medieval Benedictines,” in Cluniac Monasticism in the Central Middle Ages, ed. Noreen Hunt (London: Macmillan, 1971), p. 80.Google Scholar
  10. 73.
    C. Lawrence, Medieval Monasticism (London: Longman, 1984), p. 112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Patricia Ranft 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Ranft

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations