Advertisement

Uneasy Spaces: The Domestic Uncanny in Contemporary Installation Art

  • Fiona Carson

Abstract

This chapter will consider the intersection of discourses around motherhood and space in the work of four contemporary female installation artists: Rachel Whiteread, Jessica Stockholder, Tacita Dean, and Louise Bourgeois. Their work references domestic and interior spaces and their associations with the maternal body and the uncanny. Freud’s original essay on The Uncanny, published in 1919, developed ideas about the fear generated by the familiar becoming unfamiliar.1 Amongst the examples of the uncanny discussed by Freud, the double, the haunted house, and the maternal womb are relevant to this discussion. The correspondence between the maternal body and the house have been further explored by feminist psychoanalytic writers like Julia Kristeva and Barbara Creed, whose arguments will be drawn on here.

Keywords

Maternal Body Maternal Origin Interior Space Domestic Space Separate Sphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Sigmund Freud, The Uncanny (London: Penguin Books, 2003), 124.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griselda Pollock, Vision and Difference: Feminism, Femininity, and the Histories of Art (London: Roudedge, 1988), 54–63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anthony Vidier, The Architectural Uncanny: Essays in the Modern Unhomely (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), 27–37.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For quotation, see Freud, The Uncanny, 124, elaborated in Barbara Creed, The Monstrous Feminine (London: Routledge, 1993), 53.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carol Clover, Men, Women, and Chainsaws (London: BFI, 1992), 18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaston Bachelard, The Poetics of Space, translated from French by Maria Jolas (Boston: Beacon Press, 1989), 5–7, 79.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charlotte Mullins, Rachel Whiteread (London: Tate Publishing, 2004), sections 1 and 2.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Michael Archer, “Ghost Meat,” Artscribe 87 (1991), 35–38.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barry Schwabsky, Lynne Tillman, and Lynne Cooke, Jessica Stockholder (London: Phaidon, 1995), 35.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Mela Davila and Roland Groenenboom, Tacita Dean (Barcelona: Museu d’Art Contemporani de Barcelona and Actar, 2001), 52.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    Julia Kristeva, “About Time,” in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986), 190–192.Google Scholar
  12. 15.
    Fred Botting, Gothic (New York: Routledge, 1996), esp.11.Google Scholar
  13. 19.
    Roger Dadoun, “Fetishism in the horror film,” in Fantasy and the Cinema, ed. James Donald, 53–54 (London: BFI, 1989), quoted in Creed, The Monstrous Feminine, 20.Google Scholar
  14. 20.
    Marina Warner, Louise Bourgeois (London: Tate Gallery, 2000), 12.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    Louise Bourgeois, Destruction of the Father, Reconstruction of the Father (London: Violette, 1998), 321.Google Scholar
  16. 23.
    Mieke Bal, “Narrative inside out: Louise Bourgeois’ Spider as Theoretical object,” Oxford Art Journal 22, no. 2 (1999), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sarah Hardy and Caroline Wiedmer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona Carson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations