Advertisement

Interface of Security and Development: The Bases

  • W. Scott Thompson

Abstract

However much grumbling there was nationally about the extent of U.S. assistance to the Philippines, within the armed forces there was always a businesslike attitude and gratitude for American weaponry and training. The military, as columnist Tony Abaya put it, “rightly or wrongly, is perceived to be pro-American.”1 Although the roots of this perception are in the nature of the connection, the practical spirit of this cooperation was always a function of senior AFP and civilian DND leaders. During the 1960s and into the 1970s it was Alejandro Melchor, an Annapolis graduate, who incarnated this. As under secretary of DND and then executive secretary at Malacañang Palace, Melchor made it his business to know all the key American military personnel in the Philippines—as well as their bosses back home. Several CINCPACs (Commanders in Chief, Pacific) were personal friends. He came to know weapons issues intimately.

Keywords

Foreign Policy Peace Corps Exploratory Talk American Base Public Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 5.
    Bonifacio S. Salamanca, “Quezon, Osmena, and Roxas and the American Military Presence in the Philippines,” Philippine Studies 37 (1989), p. 314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© W. Scott Thompson 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Scott Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.Fletcher School of Law and DiplomacyUSA

Personalised recommendations