Skip to main content
  • 86 Accesses

Abstract

In speaking about anagnorisis Aristotle had in mind the tragedies of his own culture. The protagonists of those tragedies were great even if they were flawed (hamartia) and even if the audience moved toward catharsis in the theatrical experience. Despite the continuities that are appealed to in the construction of “Western” culture, which is part of intellectual history and the trope of the translation of empire, there have been great changes. Many of those transformations, especially since the Middle Ages, and, particularly since the advent of the Industrial Revolution, have been technological. Trains, planes, automobiles, film, television, and computers are just a few innovations that go beyond those scientific discoveries that drove navigation, manufacture, warfare, and artistic production. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller looked back to the witch-hunt in Salem, Massachusetts, at the end of the seventeenth century to create a typology between that hysteria and the recent outbreak led by McCarthy against Communists and those who would be smeared with that name. In creating Death of a Salesman, Miller addressed the idea that an ordinary person could be the focus of a tragedy. Democratic America—the brave New World—could usher in a new kind of hero. Moreover, film and television directors could produce plays with ethical and theatrical values that built on those of the Greeks but that also differed with them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. In this production, Hoffman’s Salesman, only because that is the most ready way to identify it and that is the way it will probably be remembered, when I talk about the director, Volker Schlondorff as if he controlled the artistic decisions of the production, it may be a fiction, for theatre and television drama are collaborative arts and in television drama, producers may have much say in the final product as I know Sam Levene did when producing The Tempest with director John Hirsch, at Stratford, Ontario, for the production of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Having made this assumption, I have picked the director as the representative most commonly responsible for artistic decisions. Lee J. Cobb played “Willy in the first film. A draft of this essay was first presented at the Fifth International Conference on Television Drama at Michigan State University. This earlier version became “The Promised End: The Conclusion of Hoffman’s Death of a Salesman, “Literature/Film Quarterly 19 (1991), 60–65. My thanks to the editors of that journal, especially James M. “Welsh, for their original interest and for their permission to reprint and to my host at MSU, Philip McGuire. Besides refraining this argument in a larger context in relation to other parts of my study on recognition and interpreting culture generally, I have tried to update the notes whenever more recent works are germane. For Miller generally, see The Cambridge Companion to Arthur Miller, ed. and intro. Christopher Bigsby (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1997). For Miller and film, see R. Barton Palmer, “Arthur Miller and the Cinema,” The Cambridge Companion to Arthur Miller, ed. and intro. Christopher Bigsby (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 184–210.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Tetsumaro Hayashi, Arthur Miller Criticism (1930–1961) (Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow, 1969)

    Google Scholar 

  3. John V. Hagopian, “Arthur Miller: The Salesman Two Cases,” Modern Drama 6(1963), 117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur Miller, “Tragedy and the Common Man” in The New York Times, February 27, 1949, 11, 1–3, rpt. in Arthur Miller, Death of a Salesman (Text and Criticism: The Viking Critical Library), ed. Gerald “Weales (New York: Viking 1967, rpt. 1977), 147. For more on tragedy and tragic elements, see Vernon Elso Johnson, Dramatic Influences in the Development of Arthur Miller’s Concept of Social Tragedy, Dissertation Abstracts 23(1962), 2135–36

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esther Merle Jackson, “Death of a Salesman: Tragic Myth in the Modern Theatre,” College Language Association Journal 7(1963), 63–76

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chinmoy Banerjee, “Arthur Miller: The Prospect of Tragedy,” An English Miscellany 3(1965), 66–76

    Google Scholar 

  7. William K. Brashear, “The Empty Bench: Morality, Tragedy, and Arthur Miller,” Michigan Quarterly Preview 5(1966), 270–78

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clinton “W. Trowbridge, “Arthur Miller: Between Pathos and Tragedy,” Modern Drama 10(1967), 221–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robert A. Martin, “Arthur Miller and the Meaning of Tragedy,” Modern Drama, 13(1970): 34–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B.S. Held, Jr., “Hamartiain Death of a Salesman,” Twentieth Century Literature: A Scholarly and Critical Journal 18(1972), 19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2006 Jonathan Hart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hart, J. (2006). Seeing Inside Willy Loman’s Head: The Tragedy of the Commoner on Film. In: Interpreting Cultures: Literature, Religion, and the Human Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11665-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics