Institutional Impediments to Human Development in Pakistan

  • Christopher Candland


Within two decades of its independence, American economic advisors declared Pakistan’s economic development a resounding success.2 Since its creation in August 1947, Pakistan had achieved and maintained high rates of growth of gross national product (GNP), averaging more than 6 percent per annum. According to dominant economic thought when Pakistan was in its formative years, the key to development — defined as growth of GNP per capita — was the concentration of capital. Thus, Pakistan’s economic planners aimed to achieve high growth rates by concentrating capital, and diverting a minimum of resources to social welfare. Inequality was an explicit component of Pakistan’s strategy of economic growth through ‘functional inequality’.3 Given the emphasis placed at that time on the ‘social utility of greed’, it seems a little strange that many now regard Pakistan’s combination of high gross domestic product growth rates and low levels of human development as ‘enigmatic’ or ‘paradoxical’.4 In view of the low priority given to human development in the past, it is not surprising that Pakistan currently suffers some of the lowest rates of literacy, life expectancy, infant and maternal survival in the world.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Mahbubul Haq, Human Development in South Asia 1997 (Oxford: Human Development Centre, 1997), 37.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    On Pakistan’s successful experiment with the ‘social utility of greed’, see Gustav Papanek, Pakistan’s Development: Social Goals and Private Incentives (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967). Papanek was an advisor to Pakistan’s Planning Commission.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    On the option of functional inequality in early Pakistani economic strategies, see Angus Maddison, ‘The Social Impact of Pakistan’s “Functional Equality”’, Class Structure and Economic Growth in India and Pakistan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973), 136–163.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    The quotations are from Iftikar Malik, State and Civil Society in Pakistan: Politics of Authority, Ideology and Ethnicity (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1997), 163; and Omar Noman, Pakistan: Political and Economic History Since 1947 (London: Kegan Paul International, 1988), 167.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen, India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995), 6–16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    UNDP, Human Development Report 1997 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), 187. The figures compared were for 1980, the latest available; and Mahbubul Haq and Khadija Haq, Human Development in South Asia 1998 (Oxford: Human Development Centre, 1998), 180–181. Figures are for 1993/4 and 1990 respectively.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Olenick, ‘Poor Socioeconomic Status Is Linked to High Maternal Mortality in Rural Pakistan’, International Family Planning Perspectives 24(2), June 1998, 96–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 9.
    Sophia Swire, Old Roads, New Highways: 50 Years of Pakistan (Karachi: Oxford University Press), 230.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    Myron Weiner, The Child and the State in India (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991), 7175.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Social Policy and Development Centre, Review of the Social Action Program, June 1997, vii.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Aisha Ghaus-Pasha, et al., Social Development in Pakistan (Karachi: Social Policy and Development Center, 1998), 40.Google Scholar
  12. 25.
    Omar Noman, ‘Primary Education in Pakistan’, in Myron Weiner and Omar Noman, The Child and the State in India and Pakistan: Child Labor and Education Policies in Comparative Perspective (Karachi: Oxford, 1995), 258.Google Scholar
  13. 28.
    Akbar Zaidi, The Political Economy of Health Care in Pakistan (Lahore: Vanguard, 1988).Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    Habibur Rahman, Growth Models and Pakistan: A Discussion of Planning Problems (Karachi: Allies Book Company, 1962), 5.Google Scholar
  15. 35.
    Akmal Hussain, Strategic Issues in Pakistan’s Economic Policy (Lahore: Progressive Publishers, 1988), 367–373.Google Scholar
  16. 36.
    Mahbubul Haq, The Strategy of Economic Planning (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963), 1–3.Google Scholar
  17. 38.
    Mahbubul Haq, ‘A Critical Review of the Third Five Year Plan’, in M. A. Khan, ed., Management and National Growth (Karachi: West Pakistan Management Association, 1968), 27. Cited and quoted in Maddison, Class Structure and Economic Growth, 158.Google Scholar
  18. 39.
    On the negative consequences of economic concentration under Ayub, see Keith Griffin and Azizur Rahman Khan, eds, Growth and Inequality in Pakistan (London: Macmillan, 1972); Stephen Lewis, Jr., Economic Policy and Industrial Growth in Pakistan (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1969); and Stephen Lewis, Pakistan: Industrialization and Trade Policies (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  19. 40.
    S. Akbar Zaidi, ‘Health, Well-being and Adjustment: The Case of Pakistan’, paper prepared for the Conference on the Impact of Structural Adjustment on Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 1997, 7.Google Scholar
  20. 42.
    Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Finance, Pakistan Economic Survey 1990 (Islamabad: Government of Pakistan Printing Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    World Bank, ‘Pakistan: Country Economic Memorandum FY93: Progress Under the Adjustment Program’ (Washington, DC: World Bank, 23 March 1993), 49.Google Scholar
  22. 44.
    Jean-Germain Gros, ‘Towards a Taxonomy of Failed States in the New World Order: Decaying Somalia, Liberia, Rwanda and Haiti’, Third World Quarterly 17(3), 1996, 455–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 45.
    Afzal Iqbal, Islamisation of Pakistan (Lahore: Vanguard, 1986), 108. Zakat collections have increased steeply since their inception in 1980, from a rate of 5.2 percent in the 1980s to 17.4 percent in the 1990s in real terms. In 1993–94, the Government of Pakistan collected Rs 1.75 billion in zakat. Asad Sayeed and A. F. Aisha Ghaus, ‘Has Poverty Returned to Pakistan?’ Social Policy and Development Centre, July 1996, 11, citing the Pakistan Economic Survey and the Annual Reports of the State Bank of Pakistan.Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    Max Weber, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, trans. H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958), 78.Google Scholar
  25. 48.
    Social Policy and Development Centre, Review of the Social Action Program (Karachi: SPDC, June 1997).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Amita Shastri and A. Jeyaratnam Wilson 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Candland

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations