Skip to main content

The Party System and the Race Problem

  • Chapter
Political Parties in American Society

Abstract

The problem of racial inequality in America, and the way the parties have responded to that problem and dealt with it, has for long posed an important test for our party system. In this chapter we describe and analyze how well the parties have done. We could have focused on other minorities (Native Americans, Hispanics, and so on). Or we could have addressed any number of policy areas in the same way: health care, the environment, education, taxation, welfare, or foreign affairs. We chose the race question because of its historical significance and contemporary salience. It is a critical issue dividing us, representing a major ideological cleavage in our politics. Our objective is to discuss the state of racial inequality, how well the parties have faced the issue, and the possible strategies that might be utilized to achieve greater progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Thomas West, Vindicating the Founders, (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835. Quoted in Donald Kinder and Lynn Sanders, Divided by Color (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. E. B. DuBois, The Souls of Black Folk (New York: Vintage, 1903), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunnar Myrdal, An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy (New York: Harper and Row, 1944), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. O. Key, Jr., Political Parties and Pressure Groups 3rd ed. (New York: Crowell, 1954), 132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cornel West, Race Matters (New York: Random House, 1994), 155–56.

    Google Scholar 

  7. We have relied a great deal on the historical scholarship of John Hope Franklin, From Slavery to Freedom (New York: Knopf, 1974), for many facts and insights presented in this summary.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edward G. Carmines and James A. Stimson, Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989). Their historical account is relied on greatly here, 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michael C. Dawson, “Black Power in 1996 and the Demonization of African Americans,” PS 29 (September 1996): 456–61.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Melvin L. Oliver and Thomas M. Shapiro, Black Wealth/White Wealth (New York: Routledge, 1997), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sheldon Danziger and Peter Gottschalk, America Unequal (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995), 90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ibid., 86.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For an elaboration of this theory, see Stephen Burman, The Black Progress Question (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995), 213–16. See also Danziger and Gottschalk, America Unequal, chap. 5, “Why Poverty Remains High.” They disagree with those who blame the black family structure as the main reason, and also develop a theory on the economic changes that have accompanied demographic shifts.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Angus Campbell, Gerald Gurin, Warren E. Miller, The Voter Decides (Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson, 1954), 10, 191–92, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenstone and Hansen present data suggesting that by 1968/72 the turnout was 67 percent (increase of 35 percent over the fifties.) They also report a decline of about 13 percent 1972 to 1988, to 54 percent. However, NES data on the reported vote do not agree with this level of decrease, suggesting a 66 percent turnout in 1964–1968, 65 percent 1972–1976, 64 percent 1980–1988, and 67 percent again in 1992. These authors, however, question the calculation of the turnout in a lengthy footnote. See Steven J. Rosenstone and John Hansen, Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America, (New York: Macmillan, 1993), 58, fn, 220–23.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Putnam, The Comparative Study of Political Elites (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1976), 171.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donald Matthews and James Prothro, Negroes and the New Southern Politics (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1966), 177.

    Google Scholar 

  19. James H. Svara, A Survey of America’s City Councils (Washington, DC: National League of Cities, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katherine Tate, From Protest to Politics (Harvard: Russell Sage Foundation, 1994), 179.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stokely Carmichael and Charles V. Hamilton, Black Power (New York: Vintage Books, 1967), 183.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Arthur H. Miller and Bruce E. Gronbeck, eds., Presidential Campaigns and American Self Images (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1994), 202–5.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Donald Kinder and Lynn M. Sanders, Divided By Color (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Charles Tilly, Durable Inequality (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 245–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2000 Bedford/St. Martin’s

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eldersveld, S.J., Walton, H. (2000). The Party System and the Race Problem. In: Political Parties in American Society. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11290-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-11290-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-62492-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-11290-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics