Eastern Marvels

  • Michael Uebel
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


In 1238, England experienced a glut of herring. At coastal cities near Yarmouth, an overabundance of the fish drove prices down to almost nothing; and in areas distant from the sea herring sold at a fraction of the usual price. That year the fish merchants of Gotland and Friesland decided against making the annual trip to Yarmouth, the place from which they always returned, their ships weighed down with herring. For Matthew Paris, whose Chronica maiora records this event, the availability and price of herring did not so much illustrate the microeconomics of fish production as lay bare a mentalité underlying Western European attitudes toward what is unknown and uncontainable.


Thirteenth Century Double Status Western Origin Usual Price Neutral Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    John Heaton, “The Other and Psychotherapy,” The Provocation of Levinas: Rethinking the Other, ed. Robert Bernascon and David Wood (London: Routledge, 1988), pp. 5–6. The other, as a central critical term in my analysis and one inherited by cultural studies from the hermeneutic philosophy of Hegel, Husserl, and Heidegger, too often loses its historical and cultural specificity in contemporary discussions of difference. For a provocative philosophical account of alterity, seeGoogle Scholar
  2. Mark C. Taylor, Altarity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987). While I would want to begin with an abstract, unlocalized definition of the other, such as the one I cite here from Tzetvan Todorov, my guiding concern is to show how medieval culture tells its own story through a history of the other: We can discover the other in ourselves, realize we are not a homogeneous substance, radically alien to whatever is not us: as Rimbaud said, Je est un autre. But others are also “Is subjects just as I am, whom only my point of view—according to which all of them are out there and I alone am in here—separates and authentically distinguishes from myself. I can conceive of these others as an abstraction, as an instance of any individual’s psychic configuration, as the Other—other in relation to myself, to me or else as a specific social group to which we do not belong. This group in turn can be interior to society: women for men, the rich for the poor, the mad for the “normal”; or it can be exterior to society, i.e., another society…unknown quantities, outsiders whose language and customs I do not understand, so foreign that in extreme instances I am reluctant to admit they belong to the same species as my own. (The Conquest of America: The Question of the Other, trans. Richard Howard [NewYork: Harper, 1984], p. 3)Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Matthew Paris, Chronica majora, ed. Henry Richards Luard, 6 vols. (London, 1876) 3: 488. All translations, unless otherwise cited in text, are my own.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    John of Piano Carpini, History of the Mongols, ch. 8 in The Mongol Mission: Narratives and Letters of the Franciscan Missionaries in Mongolia and China in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries, ed. and trans. Christopher Dawson (New York: Sheed and Ward, 1955), p. 45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The legend of Prester John as a Western fantasy of power dominated the imagination of crusaders from the Second to the Fifth Crusade (ca. 1150–1240). An interesting, yet as we shall see typical, conflation occurred at the time of the Fifth Crusade, as the crusaders approach Damietta. In a letter, dated April 18, 1221, sent to a number of important personages, including Pope Honorius III, Jacques de Vitry expected relief from a certain oriental prince named David, whom he identified with Prester John. David (also taken to be Prester John’s son) turned out to be none other than Genghis Khan. The letter is edited by R. B. C. Huygens, Lettres de Jacques de Vitry, 1160/70-1240, évêque de S. Jean-d’Acre (Leiden: Brill, 1960), pp. 134–53. On the identification of Prester John with David and its role in the propaganda of the Fifth Crusade, see Friedrich Zarncke, “Der Priester Johannes als Vorfahr des sogenanntes König David, des Mongolen Dschingiskhan,” Abhandlungen der philologisch-historischen Classe der königlichen sächsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften 8 (1883): 5–59; Martin Gosman, “La legende du Prêtre Jean et la propagande auprès des Croisés devant Damiette (1218–1221),” La croisade: réalités et fictions. Actes du Colloque d’Amiens 18–22 Mars 1987 (Göppingen: Kümmerle, 1989), pp. 133–42; andGoogle Scholar
  6. R. W. Southern, Western Views of Islam in the Middle Ages (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962), pp. 45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 8.
    See, e.g., “The Tartar Relation” (Historia Tartarorum), a largely ethnographic description of the Mongols written down in 1247 by a certain C. de Bridia upon the occasion of Piano Carpini’s return to Europe, in R. A. Skelton, Thomas E. Marston, and George D. Painter, The Vinland Map and the Tartar Relation (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1965), p. 97. Or this concerning the taste of Mongols for pickled human flesh in the Egerton MS version of Mandeville:“When thai ensege a castell or a walled toune, thai behete thaim that er enseged so faire proffers that it is wonder; for thai will graunt tham what-sum-ever thai asch. Bot, als sone as thai hafe yolden tham, thai slae tham and cuttez off thaire eres and layes tham in vynegre for to sowce and makez of thaim a dayntee meet for grete lordes” (The Buke of John Maundeuill. being the Travels of John Mandeville, Knight 1322–56. A Hitherto Unpublished English Version from the Unique Copy (Egerton Ms. 1982) in the British Museum… together with the French Text, Notes, and an Introduction, ed. George F. Warner [London: Roxburghe Club, 1889], p. 123). For a recent overview of Western myths of Mongol cannibalism, seeGoogle Scholar
  8. Gregory G. Guzman, “Reports of Mongol Cannibalism in the Thirteenth-Century Latin Sources: Oriental Fact or Western Fiction?” Discovering New Worlds: Essays on Medieval Exploration and Imagination ed. Scott D. Westrem, (NewYork: Garland, 1991), pp. 31–68. The figure of the cannibal, as I suggest later, is an important image in the construction of specific kinds of fantasies. The widespread figure was central to the formation of national consciousness and identity.Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    The existence of Gog and Magog was established on the basis of Gen. 10:1–5, Ezek. 38:1–23 and 39:1–6, and Rev. 20:7–10. On his map of Palestine, Matthew Paris depicts in the north Alexanders walls and the inclusi, and states in a rubric that from this same direction came the Tartars. See Konrad Miller, Mappae Mundi: Die ältesten Weltkarten, 6 vols. (Stuttgart, 1895–98) 3: 93. The fourteenth-century Hereford mappa mundi shows a northern European peninsula surrounded by walls and towers. The rubric occupying the area refers to the medieval legend of Gog and Magog: seeGoogle Scholar
  10. Vicomte de Santarém, Essai sur l’histoire de la cosmographie et de la cartographie pendant le Moyen-Age, ed. Martim de Albuquerque, 3 vols. [Lisbon: Administra? do Porto de Lisboa, 1989] 2: 338. On the equation of the Tartari inclusi with Gog and Magog, seeGoogle Scholar
  11. Andrew Runni Anderson, Alexander’s Gate, Gog and Magog, and the Enclosed Nations (Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy, 1932), pp. 14, 98–103.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    On the development of the “siege mentality” in late-medieval and early-modern Europe see Jean Delumeau, La peur en Occident (XlVe-XVIIIe siècles): Une cité assiégé (Paris: Fayard, 1978).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Margaret T. Hodgen characterizes the first 1,300 years of Christianity as “a prolonged interlude of continual anxiety” (Early Anthropology in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries [Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1964], p. 73).Google Scholar
  14. Jacques Le Goff frames the Middle Ages in the same general terms: “the mentalities and sensibilities of medieval men were dominated by [a] sense of insecurity which determined the basis of their attitudes” (Medieval Civilization [New York: Blackwell, 1988], p. 325). A classic statement on Western medieval “paranoid phantasy” (p. 71), here in the context of popular eschatology, isGoogle Scholar
  15. Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium (London: Seckar and Warburg, 1957), pp. 69–74.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    By “ideological construction,” I refer to the “representational structures” of “the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence” (Louis Althusser, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses,” Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster [New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971], p. 162).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Jonathan Dollimore, Sexual Dissidence: Augustine to Wilde/Freud to Foucault (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), p. 229; emphasis added. Or, as Dollimore puts it in a trenchant aphorism, “to be against (opposed to) is also to be against (close up, in proximity to) or, in other words, up against” (p. 229).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    Michel de Certeau, “Spatial Stories,” The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Rendall (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), p. 127.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin Heidegger, “Building, Dwelling, Thinking,” Basic Writings, ed. David Ferreu Krell (NewYork: Harper & Row, 1977), p. 332.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Louis Marin, “Frontiers of Utopia: Past and Present,” Critical Inquiry 19 (1993): 416 [397–420].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Identifying with others can generate what Dollimore calls “a politics of proximity.” Dollimore quotes a crucial passage in Homi Bhabha, “The Commitment to Theory,” New Formations 5 (1988): 10–11 [5-23]:“The language of critique is effective not because it keeps for ever separate the terms of the master and the slave…but to the extent to which it overcomes the given grounds of opposition and opens up a space of‘translation’: a place of hybridity, figuratively speaking, where the construction of a political object that is new, neither the one nor the Other, properly alienates our political expectations, and changes, as it must, the very forms of our recognition of the ‘moment’ of politics…This must be a sign that history is happening— within the windless pages of theory.”Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    See Jacques Le Goff, “The Medieval West and the Indian Ocean: An Oneiric Horizon,” Time, Work, and Culture in the Middle Ages, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980), pp. 189–200.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Three excellent encyclopedic treatments of medieval conceptions of Eastern wonders, especially monster traditions, are Rudolf Wittkower, “Marvels of the East: A Study in the History of Monsters,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 5 (1942): 159–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. John Block Friedman, The Monstrous Races in Medieval Art and Thought (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981); andGoogle Scholar
  25. Claude Lecouteux, Les monstres dans la littérature allemande du Moyen Age: Contribution à l’étude du merveilleux médiéval, 3 vols. (Göppingen: Kümmerle, 1982).Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Saint Augustine, City of God, trans. Henry Bettenson (New York: Penguin, 2003), p. 662.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    On the theme of wilderness in Hebrew thought see George H. Williams, Wilderness and Paradise in Christian Thought: The Biblical Experience of the Desert in the History of Christianity and the Paradise Theme in the Theological Idea of the University (New York: Harper, 1962), pp. 10–64; andGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayden White, “The Forms of Wildness: Archaeology of an Idea,” Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978), pp. 157–62. The prominence of the city/wilderness opposition in Greek thought should also be mentioned. The opposition between civilized and barbarian translates to one of inside/outside: in the city-state a man could achieve full humanity as a “political animal” (Aristotle); outside the city lawlessness precluded the possibility of a man ever realizing his full humanity. Inside he could be a political subject, outside only a curious object (see White, “The Forms Of Wildness,” p. 169).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See, e.g., the account of Muhammad’s origins and rise to power in cap. 2 of William of Tripoli’s Tractatus de statu Saracenorum et de Mahomete pseudo-propheta et eorum lege et fide in Hans Prutz, Kulturgeschichte der Kreuzzüge (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964), pp. 575–98, esp. 576.Google Scholar
  30. 34.
    The conflation of Saracens and dogs occurs in the French chansons de geste, where the Muslims are frequently portrayed as barking like dogs when they rush into battle. See C. Meredith Jones, “The Conventional Saracen of the Songs of Geste,” Speculum 17 (1942): 205 [201–225].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 39.
    This sense of monstrum as something to behold is conveyed in the primary meanings of the word and its cognates. In addition to ModE “monster,” these include a visit or view, a sample (s.v. “monstrum” in R. E. Latham, Revised Medieval Latin Word-List from British and Irish Sources [London: Oxford University Press, 1965]); a celestial phenomenon (s.v.“monstrum” in Novum Glossarium latinitatis [Hafni: Munkgaard, 1900-]); pieces of evidence (s.v. “monstra” inGoogle Scholar
  32. Jan Frederik Niermeyer, Mediae latinitatis lexicon minus: A Medieval Latin-French/English Dictionary [Leiden: Brill, 1976]); ecclesiastical monstrance (s.v.“monstrum (2)” in Glossarium mediae et infitnae latinitatis, ed. Charles du Cange et al. [Paris: Firmin Didot, 1840–50]).Google Scholar
  33. 40.
    Anthropologist Michael Taussig (The Nervous System [NewYork: Routledge, 1992]) uses the term “nervous system” as a figure for the historical condition of terror, which he asserts is the other in the postmodern age. Such a nervous system is structured upon a dialectic of disorder and order, hysteria and numbing acceptance, centered reason and “decentered randomness.” He refers to “a state of doubleness of social being in which one moves in bursts between somehow accepting the situation as normal, only to be thrown into a panic or shocked into disorientation by an event, a rumor, a sight, something said, or not said—something that even while it requires the normal in order to make its impact, destroys it” (p. 18). Taussig’s “optics of the nervous system” provides a postmodern analog to medieval forms of imagining the other. See esp. pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  34. 41.
    Michel de Certeau, “Montaigne’s ‘Of Cannibals’: The Savage ‘I,’” Heterologies: Discourse on the Other, trans. Brian Massumi (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), p. 70.Google Scholar
  35. 42.
    India, though the most important for the construction of the Prester John myth, is hardly the only neutral space in the Middle Ages; others include St. Brendan’s island, the Purgatory of St. Patrick, the Land of Cocaigne, the Fortunate Isles, Ireland, and Columbus’s West Indies. A good, if outdated, survey of these spaces is George Boas, Essays on Primitivism and Related Ideas in the Middle Ages (New York: Octagon, 1948).Google Scholar
  36. 43.
    See John Kirtland Wright, The Geographical Lore of the Time of the Crusades: A Study in the History of Medieval Science and Tradition in Western Europe (New York: American Geographical Society, 1925), p. 272. Wright’s citation of an exception to the threefold division of India is mistaken. The Elysaeus account of Prester John’s kingdom, cited as evidence of a twofold division, in fact maintains the traditional threefold one:“Indiae tres sunt.” For a sense of the shifting geographical limits defining the three Indias, seeGoogle Scholar
  37. Jean Richard, “L’extrème-orient légendaire au moyen âge: Roi David et Prêtre Jeun,” Annales d’Ethiopie 2 (1957): 226–27 [225-42].Google Scholar
  38. 45.
    Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981), p. 79.Google Scholar
  39. 46.
    Jean-Luc Nancy and Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, “The Nazi Myth,” Critical Inquiry 16 (1990): 297 [291–312].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 47.
    Georges Dumézil (The Destiny of the Warrior, trans. Alf Hiltebeitel [Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970]) writes that “the function of…myths is to express dramatically the ideology under which a society lives; not only to hold out to its conscience the values it recognizes and the ideals it pursues from generation to generation, but above all to express its very being and structure, the elements, the connections, the balances, the tensions that constitute it; to justify the rules and traditional practices without which everything within a society would disintegrate” (p. 3).Google Scholar
  41. 48.
    Northrop Frye, “Varieties of Literary Utopias,” Utopias and Utopian Thought, ed. Frank E. Manuel (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1966), p. 25. See also the third essay, “Archetypal Criticism: Theory of Myths,” in his Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957), pp. 131–58.Google Scholar
  42. 50.
    See the brief discussion of this topos in Hans Robert Curtius, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans. Willard R. Trask (New York: Pantheon, 1953), pp. 160–61.Google Scholar
  43. 51.
    Aymeri de Narbonne, ed. Louis Demaison, 2 vols. (Paris, 1887) 1: 55; ll.1277, 1283–84, cf. 1. 2426. For other examples of the India topos and the extent of its use, see André Moisan, Repertoire des noms propres de personnes et de lieux cités dans les chansons de geste fran?ses et les oeuvres étrangères dérivées, 5 vols. (Genève: Droz, 1986) 2: 1199, s.v. “Inde, Ynde”; and Ernest Langlois, Table des noms propres de toute nature compris dans les chansons de geste imprimées (1904; Genève: Slatkine, 1974), p. 359, s.v. “Inde, Ynde.”Google Scholar
  44. 52.
    See, e.g., two of the earliest and clearest statements on the subject in Arnold van Gennep, The Rites of Passage, trans. Monika B. Vizedom and Gabrielle L. Caffee (1908; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960) andGoogle Scholar
  45. Victor W. Turner, The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure (Chicago: Aldine, 1969), pp. 94–130.Google Scholar
  46. 54.
    See Friedman, Monstrous Races, pp. 37–58. For good discussions of the significance of medieval cartography, see Anna-Dorothee von den Brincken, “Mappamundi und Chronographia,” Deutsches Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters 24 (1968): 118–86; and her “‘…ut describeretur universus orbis’: Zur Universalkartographie des Mittelalters,” Miscellanea Mediaevalia 7 (1970): 249–78.Google Scholar
  47. 55.
    Roger Bacon, The Opus Majus of Roger Bacon, trans. Robert Belle Burke, 2 vols. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1928) 1: 320. Compare Statements in Pliny the Elder, Naturalis Historia 2.80.189–91, in Natural History, trans. H. Rackham (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949) 1: 321–23; and Albertus Magnus, De natura loci, tract. 1 cap. 2, in De natura loci/De causis proprietatum elementorum/De generatione et corruptione Google Scholar
  48. ed. Paul Hossfeld, vol. 5, pt. 2 of Opera Omnia (Aschendorff: Monasterii Westfalorum, 1980), pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Uebel 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Uebel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations