Advertisement

Cross-Border Categories: Ethnic Chinese and the Sino-Vietnamese Border at Mong Cai

  • Christopher Hutton

Abstract

People on borders, and people who cross borders, people who live on boats, and people who are nomadic may be especially difficult to classify. They are not tied to a particular territory, and do not fit the agrarian model of identity that underlies both much of Western theorizing (ethnic group plus language plus homeland) and nationalist ideologies based on peasant culture. They represent the remnants of pre-modern identities in the sense that the people concerned do not have to have a clear answer to questions such as “What is your mother-tongue?” or “What is your ethnicity?” The questions asked by the ethnographer or linguist symbolize the approaching centralizing-categorization process of the state.

Keywords

Special Force Illegal Immigrant Detention Centre South China Morning Vietnamese Government 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso, 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Batha, Emma. “UN Accepts Former Viet Soldiers as Refugees”. South China Morning Post, 3 June 1997a.Google Scholar
  3. Batha, Emma. “An Old Soldier Wins His Fight for Freedom”. South China Morning Post, 15 June 1997b.Google Scholar
  4. Batha, Emma. “Ethnic Chinese Lose Appeal”. South China Morning Post, 6 January 1997c.Google Scholar
  5. Buttinger, Joseph. The Smaller Dragon: A Political History of Vietnam. New York: Praeger, 1958.Google Scholar
  6. Castillon du Perron, P. “Étude d’un peuplement Man Xanh-Y”. Bulletin de la Société des Études Indochinoises 29, no. 1 (1954): 22–42.Google Scholar
  7. Chen Min. The Strategic Triangle: Lessons from the Indochina War. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Chen Yongling, ed. Minzu Cidian [Dictionary of ethnology]. 2nd ed. Shanghai: Shangha Cishu Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Chuong Sau. “Dan Toc Hoa”. In Cac Dan Toc It Nguoi o Viet Nam, pp. 388–95. Hanoi: Nha Xuat Ban Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, Beryl. “Illegal Immigrants Sail into Trouble”. South China Morning Post, 23 April 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Dang Nghiem Van, Chu Thai Son, and Luu Hung. The Ethnic Minorities in Vietnam. Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Dang Nghiem Van, Chu Thai Son, and Luu Hung. Ethnic Minorities in Vietnam. Vietnam: The Gioi Publishers, 1993.Google Scholar
  13. [Dossier]. The Hoa in Vietnam: Dossier. Documents of Vietnam Courier. Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1978a.Google Scholar
  14. [Dossier II]. The Hoa in Vietnam: Dossier II. Documents of Vietnam Courier. Hanoi: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1978b.Google Scholar
  15. Edmondson, Jerold. “Some Kadai Languages of Northern Guangxi, China”. In Pan-Asiatic Linguistics: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 28–43. Thailand, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Fall, Bernard. The Two Viet-Nams: A Political and Military Analysis. 2nd rev. ed. Boulder and London: Westview Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, George, et al. U.S. Army Area Handbook for Vietnam. Washington, D.C.: Foreign Areas Studies Division, U.S. Army, 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Haudricourt, A. “Note sur les dialectes de la région de Moncay”. Bulletin de l’École Française d’extrême-Orient. Tome L. Fase. 1 (1960): 161–77.Google Scholar
  19. Hu Qiaomu, ed. Zhongguo Da Baike Quangshu (Minzu) [Encyclopaedia Sinica: ethnology]. Beijing: Zhongguo Da Baike Quangshu, 1986.Google Scholar
  20. Lewallen, John. Ecology of Devastation: Indochina. Maryland: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
  21. Mackenzie, Annette. “Thousands of Vietnamese in China Set to Flee to Hong Kong”. South China Morning Post, 13 July 1993.Google Scholar
  22. MacMahon, F. and S. Furlong. “Fears for Repatriated Minority”. South China Morning Post, 5 August 1992.Google Scholar
  23. Maspero, Georges. Un empire colonial françtais, L’indochine, vol. 1. Paris: G. van Oest, 1929.Google Scholar
  24. Ng Kang-Chung. “Unwanted Campers Plan Their Escape”. South China Morning Post, 17 July 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Nguyen Dinh Khoa. Cac Dan Toc o Mien Bac Viet Nam [The minorities of northern Vietnam]. Hanoi: Nha Xuat Ban Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi, 1976.Google Scholar
  26. Nguyen Truc Binh. “Ve toc danh dan, sin trong nhom ngoui hoa o vung ven bien Quang Ninh”. Thong bao Dan toc hoc 1 (1972): 90–96.Google Scholar
  27. Nguyen Van Ai. “Vai net ve he thong ngu am tieng San Diu”. Pages 125–138 In Tim hieu ngon ngu cac dan toc thieu so o viet nam [Investigations into the languages of the ethnic minorities of Vietnam], vol. 1. Hanoi: Uy Ban Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi Viet Nam, 1972.Google Scholar
  28. Nguyen Van Canh. Vietnam under Communism, 1975–1982. Stanford, California: Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. [Nung]. “Request for Help from a Group of Minority People Who Migrated from the Highland of North Vietnam — the Nung”, translated by Ka Fue. Mimeographed. Hong Kong, 1990.Google Scholar
  30. Olson, James. Dictionary of the Vietnam War. New York: Greenwood Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  31. Prados, John. The Hidden History of the Vietnam War. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 1995.Google Scholar
  32. Savina, F.M. Dictionnaire Etymologique. Français-Nung-Chinois. Hong Kong: Imprimerie de la Société des Missions Étrangères, 1924.Google Scholar
  33. Schröck, Joann et al. Minority Groups in North Vietnam. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.Google Scholar
  34. Torode, Greg. “French Lobbied in Border Dispute”. South China Morning Post, 7 May 1997.Google Scholar
  35. Unger, E.S. “The Struggle over the Chinese Community in Vietnam”. Pacific Affairs 60 (1987): 596–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Urciuoli, Bonnie. “Language and Borders”. Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1995): 525–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vaillant, Louis. “L’Étude anthropologique des Chinois Hak-ka de la province de Mongcay (Tonkin)”. L’Anthropologie 30 (1920): 83–109.Google Scholar
  38. Vietnam Economic Times. “Too Much? After Years of Chronic Cement Shortages, Vietnam May Be Heading for a Market Glut”. Supplement, June 1997.Google Scholar
  39. [Vietnamese government]. “Nomenclature of Vietnamese Ethnic Groups. Report persuant to Directive No. 83-CD of the Government Council of Vietnam, in which 54 groups were identified (December 1978)”. Vietnamese Studies 2, no. 72 (1978): 161–68.Google Scholar
  40. Vu Ba Hung. “Buoc dau tim hieu he thong nhu am tieng hoa”. In Tim hieu ngon ngu cac dan toc thieu so o viet nam [Investigations into the languages of the ethnic minorities of Vietnam], vol. 1, pp. 105–38. Hanoi: Uy Ban Khoa Hoc Xa Hoi Viet Nam, 1972.Google Scholar
  41. Vy Thi Be, Janice E. Saul, and Nancy Freiberger Wilson. Nung Fan Slihng-English dictionary. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1982.Google Scholar
  42. Wan, Mariana. “We Don’t Belong in Vietnam”. South China Morning Post, 1 May 1995.Google Scholar
  43. Western, Neil. “Hope for 250 as Court Frees Viet”. Hong Kong Standard, 31 May 1997.Google Scholar
  44. Weinrich, Uriel. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, no. 1. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York, 1953.Google Scholar
  45. Whitfield, Danny. Historical and Cultural Dictionary of Vietnam. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  46. Womack, Brandy. “Sino-Vietnamese Border Trade”. Asian Survey 34 (1994): 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Hutton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations