Advertisement

Analyzing Japanese Firms’ Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Asia

  • Vinod K. Aggarwal

Abstract

Despite the lingering effects of the regional currency crises in the late 1990s, and Japan’s stubborn economic affliction, the Asia-Pacific economies continue to be among the most attractive markets in the world. The track record of these newly industrialized countries, both before and after the crises, China’s phenomenal growth rates, and the widespread regional trend of economic liberalization speak for themselves. But the ups and downs of East Asian markets have forced Japanese, American, and European firms to rethink their strategies. Some firms responded by increasing investments in the region, hoping to snatch up distressed assets that will strengthen their position to profit from renewed growth. Other firms are concerned that excessive reliance on Asia has made them vulnerable. As a result, they have sought to diversify their operations to position themselves in newly emerging markets in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and elsewhere.

Keywords

World Trade Organization Foreign Firm Japanese Firm Market Strategy Uruguay Round 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aggarwal,Vinod K. (1992). “The Political Economy of Service Sector Negotiations in the Uruguay Round,” The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, vol. 16, no. 1 (Winter), pp. 35–54.Google Scholar
  2. Aggarwal,Vinod K. ed. (1998). Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages, and Nesting (Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Aggarwal,Vinod K. (2000). “The Wobbly Triangle: Europe, Asia and the U.S. after the Asian Crisis.” In After the Asian Crises: Perspectives on Global Politics and Economics, ed. Maria Weber (London: Macmillan), pp. 173–198.Google Scholar
  4. Aggarwal, Vinod K., Robert Keohane, and David Yoffie (1987). “The Dynamics of Negotiated Protectionism,” American Political Science Review, vol. 81, no. 2 (June), pp. 345–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Charles Morrison, eds. (1998). Asia-Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC (NewYork: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  6. Aggarwal,Vinod K. and John Ravenhill (2001).”Undermining the WTO: The Case Against ‘Open Sectoralism,’ “Asia Pacific Issues, no. 50 (February).Google Scholar
  7. Bain, J. E. (1956). Barriers to New Competition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, David (1999). “Integrated Market and Nonmarket Strategies in Client and Interest Group Politics,” Business and Politics 1 (1) (April).Google Scholar
  9. Baron, David (2000). Business and Its Environment, 3rd edition (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  10. Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal (1989). Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution (Boston: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Coase, Ronald (1960). “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics (October), p. 186.Google Scholar
  12. Coase, Ronald, Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  13. Dupont, Cedric (2001). ”Euro-Pressure:Avenues and Strategies for Lobbying the European Union.” In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwal (New York: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  14. Haas, Ernst (1980).”Why Collaborate? Issue-linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 357–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad (1989). “Strategic Intent,” Harvard Business Review (May June), pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, Charles and Gareth Jones (1995). Strategic Management Theory: An Integrated Approach (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
  17. Henisz, Witold Jerzy (2000). “The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 16 (2): pp. 334–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein, Benjamin and Keith B. Leffler (1981). “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,”Journal of Political Economy 89, pp. 615–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. North, Douglass C. (1981). Understanding the Process of Economic Change (London: Institute of Economic Affairs)Google Scholar
  20. North, Douglass C. (1999). Structure and Change in Economic History, 1st edition (NewYork: Norton).Google Scholar
  21. Oye, Kenneth (1979). “The Domain of Choice.” In Eagle Entangled: U.S. Foreign Policy in a Complex World, eds. Kenneth Oye, Robert Lieber, and Donald Rothschild (NewYork: Longman), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
  22. Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel (1990). “The Core Competence of the Corporation,” Harvard Business Review (May June), pp. 79–91.Google Scholar
  23. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  24. Ravenhill, John (2001). “Nonmarket Strategies in Asia: The Regional Level.” In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, ed. Vinod K. Aggarwal (New York: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  25. Stein, Art (1980). “The Politics of Linkage,” World Politics, vol. 33, no. 1, October.Google Scholar
  26. Williamson, Oliver E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets and Relational Contracting (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  27. Williamson, Oliver E. (1996). The Mechanisms of Governance (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Vinod K. Aggarwal and Shujiro Urata 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vinod K. Aggarwal

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations