Advertisement

Petitioning and Creating Rights: Judicialization in Argentina

  • Catalina Smulovitz
Part of the Studies of the Americas book series (STAM)

Abstract

Courts and the law are playing an increasingly important political role. Courts are redefining public policies decided by representative authorities, and citizens are using the law and rights-framed discourses as political tools to address private and social demands, as well as to govern everyday social interactions previously regulated by cooperation, trust, or kinship. This increased use of legal procedures and rights-framed discourses is taking place in various forms and in different regions and has given birth to a growing literature on the judicialization of politics.1 Analysts agree that the process involves the expansion of the domains and roles of the courts, judges, and litigants. While some studies highlight the non-democratic political impact that courts as political agencies, and judges as political actors, have on sovereign decisions; others center on the democratic implications of citizens’ increased use of the law as a petitioning tool. Still others emphasize the deleterious consequences of the judicialization of interpersonal and everyday relationships on social life (Glendon, 1991). These outcomes are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, they can take place simultaneously, leading to mixed and ambiguous assessments regarding the consequences of the process of judicialization.

Keywords

Sexual Harassment Pension Fund Supreme Court Legal Strategy Legal Dispute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acufia, Carlos and Catalina Smulovitz (1997) “Guarding the Guardians in Argentina: Some Lessons about the Risks and Benefits of Empowering the Courts,” in James McAdams (ed.), Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 93–122.Google Scholar
  2. Bercholc, Jorge (2000) “Independencia de la Corte Suprema a traves del control de constitucionalidad 1935–1983” (MIMEO).Google Scholar
  3. CELS (Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales) (1998) Derechos Humanos en Argentina: Informe Anual. Google Scholar
  4. CLES@@(July 2002) Argentina: Shadow Report from ONGs to CEDAW Committee [Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women].Google Scholar
  5. Consejo Nacional de la Mujer (2002) La mujery la violencia en la Republica Argentina (Buenos Aires: CNM). See http://www.cnm.gov.ar/areainterv/violencia.htmGoogle Scholar
  6. Epp, Charles (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  7. Felstiner, William, Richard Abel, and Austin Sarat, “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…,” Law and Society Review, vol. 15, no. 3–4 (1980–1981), pp. 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galanter, Marc (1983) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Keith Boyum and Lynn Mather (eds.), Empirical Theories About Courts (New York: Longman), pp. 117–42.Google Scholar
  9. Garapon, Antoine (1997) Juez y democracia (Madrid: Flor del Viento Ediciones).Google Scholar
  10. Glendon, Mary Ann (1991) Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  11. Guarneri, Carlo and Patrizia Pederzoli (1999) Los jueces y la politica: Poder judicialy democracia (Madrid: Taurus).Google Scholar
  12. Lynch, Horacio, “Emergencia, derecho, justicia y seguridad juridical (reflexiones sobre la crisis y las libertades economicas),” La Ley, vol. 2002-C, pp. 1287–312.Google Scholar
  13. McCann, Michael “Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on Theory and its Application,” Studies in Law, Politics and Society, vol. 11 (1991), pp. 225–54.Google Scholar
  14. McCann, Michael@@(1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  15. McCann, Michael@@(1998) “How Does Law Matter for Social Movements?” in Bryant Garth and Austin Sarat (eds.), How Does Law Matter? (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press), pp. 76–108.Google Scholar
  16. Minow, Martha, “Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover,” Tale Law Journal, vol. 96, no. 8 (July 1987), pp. 1860–1915.Google Scholar
  17. Molinelli, Guillermo (1999) “La Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nacion frente a los poderes politicos a traves del control de constitucionalidad, 1983–98” (MIMEO).Google Scholar
  18. Scheingold, Stuart (1974) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy and Political Change (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Shapiro, Martin and Alec Stone Sweet (2002) On Law, Politics and Judicialization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smulovitz, Catalina (2001) “Judicializacion y Accountability Social” (MIMEO).Google Scholar
  21. Smulovitz, Catalina@@(2002) “The Discovery of Law: Political Consequences in the Argentine Experience,” in Bryant Garth and Yves Dezalay (eds.), Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press), pp. 249–75.Google Scholar
  22. — (2003) “Protest by Other Means: Legal Mobilization in the Argentinian Crisis” (MIMEO).Google Scholar
  23. Tate, Neal and Torbjorn Vallinder (eds.) (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Tobar, Federico, C. Fernandez Pardo et al. (2001) “Impacto economico de la mala praxis medica: Costo de las demandas, juicios y seguros en Argentina” (Programa de Investigation Aplicada. Buenos Aires: Instituto Universitario Isalud).Google Scholar
  25. Zemans, Frances, “Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System,” American Political Science Review vol. 77. no. 3 (1983), pp. 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catalina Smulovitz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations