Abstract
Ever since the arrest of General Augusto Pinochet by British authorities in October 1998—and the trial that followed it over the next two years—the judicialization of Chilean politics has been associated with this landmark case. Indeed, given the spectacular nature of the trial of one of the world’s most notorious dictators in a procedure that seemed to inaugurate the era of universal jurisdiction in cases involving gross human rights violations, it is only natural that journalistic and academic attention has focused on the role of the Chilean courts in this case, as well as in others dealing with human rights violations perpetrated during the 17-year-long regime initiated with the military coup of 1973. As a result of this interest, there has been a considerable amount of research over the past few years that have addressed the origins, trajectory, and potential consequences of the Pinochet and related trials for the future of Chile’s democratic system.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abraham, Henry (1968) The Judicial Process: An Introductory Analysis of the Courts of the United States, England, and France (New York: Oxford University Press).
Atria, Fernando, “Revision judicial: El sindrome de la victima insatisfecha,” Estudios Publicos, no. 79 (2000), pp. 347–402.
Bauer, Carl, “The Contradictory Role of the Judiciary in Chile’s Neoliberal Economic Model” (Paper presented at the First Congress of the Latin American and Caribbean Association of Law and Economics, Mexico City, February 2–3, 1995).
Becker, Theodore (1987) Comparative Judicial Politics: The Political Functioning of Courts (Washington, DC: University Press of America).
Brody, Reed and Michael Ratner (eds.) (2000) The Pinochet Papers: The Case of Augusto Pinochet in Spain and Britain (Leiden, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff).
Burbach, Roger (2004) The Pinochet Affair: State Terrorism and Global Justice (London: Zed Books).
Cavallo, Ascanio (1998) La historia o cult a de la transicion: Memoria de una epoca, 1990–1998 (Santiago, Chile: Editorial Grijalbo).
Centro de Estudios Publicos (1991) Proposiciones para la reforma judicial (Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Publicos).
Cisternas, Maria Soledad (2001) “La discapacidad en Chile: Un tema de proyeccion urgente,” in Felipe Gonzalez (ed.), Discriminacion e Interes Publico (Santiago, Chile: Cuadernos de Analisis Juridico de la Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales), pp. 9–63.
Comision Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliation (1991) Informe. In translation by Phillip E. Berryman (1993) (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).
Correa, Jorge (1999) “La Cenicienta se queda en la fiesta: El poder judicial chileno en la decada de los 90,” in Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic (eds.), El modelo chileno: Democracia y desarrollo en los noventa (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones), pp. 281–315.
Corte Suprema, “Respuesta de la Corte Suprema al Informe de la Comision de Verdad y Reconciliation,” Estudios Publicos, no. 42 (1991), pp. 237–50.
Couso, Javier, “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition, 1990–2002,” Democratization, vol. 10, no. 4 (2003), pp. 70–91.
Davis, Madeleine (ed.) (2003) The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress, and Implications (London: Institute of Latin American Studies).
Epp, Charles (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Diego Portales (2003) Informe anual de derechos humanos: Hechos del 2002 (Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales).
Gomez, Gaston (1999) “Algunas ideas criticas sobre la jurisdiction constitutional en Chile,” in Gaston Gomez (ed.), La jurisdiction constitucional chilena ante la reforma (Santiago, Chile: Cuadernos de Analisis Juridicos de la Universidad Diego Portales, vol. 41), pp. 89–107.
Gonzalez, Felipe (2004) “Cultura judicial y ensenanza del derecho en Chile: Una aproximacion,” in Informe de Investigation (Santiago, Chile: Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales), pp. 293–319.
Hilbink, Lisa (1999) “Legalism against Democracy: The Political Role of the Judiciary in Chile, 1964–1994” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego).
Holland, Kenneth (ed.) (1991) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective (London: Macmillan).
Human Rights Watch (1998) The Limits to Tolerance: Freedom of Expression and Public Debate in Chile (New York: Human Rights Watch).
Huneeus, Carlos (2000) El regimen de Pinochet (Santiago, Chile: Editorial Sudamericana).
Lira, Elizabeth and Brian Loveman (1999) “Derechos humanos en la ‘Transition Modelo,’” in Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic (eds.), El modelo chileno: Democracia y desarrollo en los noventa (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones), pp. 339–74.
Loveman, Brian and Elizabeth Lira (2000) Las ardientes cenizas del olvido: Via chilena de reconciliation politica, 1932–1994 (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones).
Matus, Alejandra (1999) El libro negro de la justicia chilena (Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta).
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Pefia, Carlos (1996) Practice constitutional y derechos fundamentaks (Santiago, Chile: Coleccion Estudios no 5, Corporation Nacional de Reparation y Reconciliation).
Powe, Lucas (2000) The Warren Court and American Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Tate, C. Neal and Torbjorn Vallinder (eds.) (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Tower (New York: New York University Press).
Woodhouse, Diana (ed.) (2000) The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing).
Zapata, Patricio (2002) La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitutional (Santiago, Chile: Biblioteca Americana, Universidad Andres Bello).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2005 Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Couso, J.A. (2005). The Judicialization of Chilean Politics: The Rights Revolution That Never Was. In: Sieder, R., Schjolden, L., Angell, A. (eds) The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10887-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10887-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-61969-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10887-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)