The Judicialization of Chilean Politics: The Rights Revolution That Never Was

  • Javier A. Couso
Part of the Studies of the Americas book series (STAM)


Ever since the arrest of General Augusto Pinochet by British authorities in October 1998—and the trial that followed it over the next two years—the judicialization of Chilean politics has been associated with this landmark case. Indeed, given the spectacular nature of the trial of one of the world’s most notorious dictators in a procedure that seemed to inaugurate the era of universal jurisdiction in cases involving gross human rights violations, it is only natural that journalistic and academic attention has focused on the role of the Chilean courts in this case, as well as in others dealing with human rights violations perpetrated during the 17-year-long regime initiated with the military coup of 1973. As a result of this interest, there has been a considerable amount of research over the past few years that have addressed the origins, trajectory, and potential consequences of the Pinochet and related trials for the future of Chile’s democratic system.1


Judicial Review Democratic Transition Military Regime Universal Jurisdiction Supreme Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abraham, Henry (1968) The Judicial Process: An Introductory Analysis of the Courts of the United States, England, and France (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Atria, Fernando, “Revision judicial: El sindrome de la victima insatisfecha,” Estudios Publicos, no. 79 (2000), pp. 347–402.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, Carl, “The Contradictory Role of the Judiciary in Chile’s Neoliberal Economic Model” (Paper presented at the First Congress of the Latin American and Caribbean Association of Law and Economics, Mexico City, February 2–3, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. Becker, Theodore (1987) Comparative Judicial Politics: The Political Functioning of Courts (Washington, DC: University Press of America).Google Scholar
  5. Brody, Reed and Michael Ratner (eds.) (2000) The Pinochet Papers: The Case of Augusto Pinochet in Spain and Britain (Leiden, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
  6. Burbach, Roger (2004) The Pinochet Affair: State Terrorism and Global Justice (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  7. Cavallo, Ascanio (1998) La historia o cult a de la transicion: Memoria de una epoca, 1990–1998 (Santiago, Chile: Editorial Grijalbo).Google Scholar
  8. Centro de Estudios Publicos (1991) Proposiciones para la reforma judicial (Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Publicos).Google Scholar
  9. Cisternas, Maria Soledad (2001) “La discapacidad en Chile: Un tema de proyeccion urgente,” in Felipe Gonzalez (ed.), Discriminacion e Interes Publico (Santiago, Chile: Cuadernos de Analisis Juridico de la Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales), pp. 9–63.Google Scholar
  10. Comision Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliation (1991) Informe. In translation by Phillip E. Berryman (1993) (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
  11. Correa, Jorge (1999) “La Cenicienta se queda en la fiesta: El poder judicial chileno en la decada de los 90,” in Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic (eds.), El modelo chileno: Democracia y desarrollo en los noventa (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones), pp. 281–315.Google Scholar
  12. Corte Suprema, “Respuesta de la Corte Suprema al Informe de la Comision de Verdad y Reconciliation,” Estudios Publicos, no. 42 (1991), pp. 237–50.Google Scholar
  13. Couso, Javier, “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition, 1990–2002,” Democratization, vol. 10, no. 4 (2003), pp. 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, Madeleine (ed.) (2003) The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress, and Implications (London: Institute of Latin American Studies).Google Scholar
  15. Epp, Charles (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  16. Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Diego Portales (2003) Informe anual de derechos humanos: Hechos del 2002 (Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales).Google Scholar
  17. Gomez, Gaston (1999) “Algunas ideas criticas sobre la jurisdiction constitutional en Chile,” in Gaston Gomez (ed.), La jurisdiction constitucional chilena ante la reforma (Santiago, Chile: Cuadernos de Analisis Juridicos de la Universidad Diego Portales, vol. 41), pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
  18. Gonzalez, Felipe (2004) “Cultura judicial y ensenanza del derecho en Chile: Una aproximacion,” in Informe de Investigation (Santiago, Chile: Facultad de Derecho, Universidad Diego Portales), pp. 293–319.Google Scholar
  19. Hilbink, Lisa (1999) “Legalism against Democracy: The Political Role of the Judiciary in Chile, 1964–1994” (Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, San Diego).Google Scholar
  20. Holland, Kenneth (ed.) (1991) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  21. Human Rights Watch (1998) The Limits to Tolerance: Freedom of Expression and Public Debate in Chile (New York: Human Rights Watch).Google Scholar
  22. Huneeus, Carlos (2000) El regimen de Pinochet (Santiago, Chile: Editorial Sudamericana).Google Scholar
  23. Lira, Elizabeth and Brian Loveman (1999) “Derechos humanos en la ‘Transition Modelo,’” in Paul Drake and Ivan Jaksic (eds.), El modelo chileno: Democracia y desarrollo en los noventa (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones), pp. 339–74.Google Scholar
  24. Loveman, Brian and Elizabeth Lira (2000) Las ardientes cenizas del olvido: Via chilena de reconciliation politica, 1932–1994 (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones).Google Scholar
  25. Matus, Alejandra (1999) El libro negro de la justicia chilena (Buenos Aires: Editorial Planeta).Google Scholar
  26. McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity and the Politics of Legal Mobilization (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  27. Pefia, Carlos (1996) Practice constitutional y derechos fundamentaks (Santiago, Chile: Coleccion Estudios no 5, Corporation Nacional de Reparation y Reconciliation).Google Scholar
  28. Powe, Lucas (2000) The Warren Court and American Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Tate, C. Neal and Torbjorn Vallinder (eds.) (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Tower (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Woodhouse, Diana (ed.) (2000) The Pinochet Case: A Legal and Constitutional Analysis (Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
  31. Zapata, Patricio (2002) La jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitutional (Santiago, Chile: Biblioteca Americana, Universidad Andres Bello).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Javier A. Couso

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations