Skip to main content

The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America

  • Chapter
The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

Current trends toward the judicialization of politics in Latin America are deeply embedded in a context of regional and international legalization. In this chapter I argue that one cannot fully understand the domestic judicialization of politics in most Latin American countries without taking this regional and international context into account. For example, to understand outcomes in the area of the judicialization of human rights politics in many countries in Latin America, we also need to be attentive to developments in international and regional human rights law, as well as the role of transnational advocacy groups. Borrowing a concept from social movement theory, I believe that to understand the current level of judicialization of human rights policy in Latin America, it is necessary to situate it within its relevant international and domestic political and legal opportunity structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abuelas de la Plaza de Mayo (2001) Juventud e Identidad, vol. 2 (Buenos Aires, Argentina: Espacio Editorial).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, Alan (2003) “The Pinochet Factor in Chilean Politics,” in Madeleine Davis (ed.), The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress and Implications (London: Institute of Latin American Studies), pp. 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo Lopez, Francisco (2003) “The Pinochet Case in the Chilean Courts,” in Madeleine Davis (ed.), The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress and Implications (London: Institute of Latin American Studies), pp. 107–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Madeleine (ed.) (2003) The Pinochet Case: Origins, Progress and Implications (London: Institute of Latin American Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Detzner, John A. (1988) Tribunates Chilenos y Derecho International de Derechos Humanos (Santiago, Chile: Editorial Tiempo Nuevo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, Charles (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippini, Leonardo (2004) “La Corte Suprema Argentina y la Convencion Americana sobre Derechos Humanos: Analisis Jurisprudencial” (LLM thesis, Palermo University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William and David S. Meyer (1996) “Framing Political Opportunity,” in Doug McAdam, John McCarthy and Mayer Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Judith, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (eds.) (2001) Legalization and World Politics (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourevitch, Peter (2002) “Domestic Politics and International Relations,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons (eds.), The Handbook of International Relations (New York: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, Oona, “The Cost of Commitment,” Stanford Law Review, vol. 55, no. 5 (2003), pp. 1821–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, Rosalyn (1994) Problems and Process: International Law and How we Use It (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbink, Lisa (2003) “An Exception to Chilean Exceptionalism? The Historical Role of Chile’s Judiciary,” in Susan Eckstein and Timothy Wickham-Crowley (eds.), What Justice? Whose Justice? Lighting for Fairness in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 64–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahler, Miles (2001) “Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case,” in Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Rober O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter (eds.), Legalization and World Politics (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret and Kathryn Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman, Brian and Elizabeth Lira (1999) Las suaves cenizas del olvido: Via chilena de reconciliation politica 1814–1932 (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones).

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2000) Las ardientes cenizas del olvido: Via chilena de reconciliation politica 1932–1994 (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveman, Brian and Elizabeth Lira (2002) El espejismo de la reconciliation: Chile 1990–2002 (Santiago, Chile: LOM Ediciones).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Ellen and Kathryn Sikkink, “The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials,” Chicago Journal of International Law, vol. 2, no. 1 (2001), pp. 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Doug (1996) “Conceptual Origins, Current Problems, Future Direction,” in Doug McAdam, John McCarthy and Mayer Zald (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 23–40.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, Douglas, Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly (2001) Dynamics of Contention (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew, “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe,” International Organization, vol. 54, no. 2 (2000), pp. 217–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natanson, Jose (ed.) (2004) El Presidente inesperado: Elgobierno de Kirchner segun los intelectuales argentinos (Buenos Aires: Homo Sapiens).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo and Phillippe C. Schmitter (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert, 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games,” International Organization, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 427–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas (2002) “Transnational Actors and World Politics,” in Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (NewYork: Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas and Kathryn Sikkink (1999) “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices,” in Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink (eds.), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Risse-Kappen, Thomas (1995) “Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: An Introduction,” in Thomas Risse-Kappen (ed.), Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures, and International Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriaza, Naomi (2004) The Pinochet Effect: Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano, Cesare, “The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle,” New Tork University Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 31, no. 4 (1999), pp. 709–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peralta Ariela (2002), Servicio Paz y Justicia Uruguay, unpublished manuscript. Servicio Paz y Justicia (SERPAJ) Uruguay (1989) Uruguay Nunca Mas: Informe sobre la violacion a los derechos humanos (1972–1985) (Montevideo: Altamira), pp. 417–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, Alfred (1986) “Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and Comparative Considerations,” in Guillermo O’Donnell, Phillippe C. Schmitter, and Laurence Whitehead (eds.), Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Comparative Perspectives (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 64–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, Alec, “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance,” Comparative Political Studies, vol. 32, no. 2 (1999), pp. 147–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney (1994) Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics (2nd edition) (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, Sidney (1996) “States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements,” in Doug McAdam, John McCarthy, and Mayer N. Zald. (eds.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Eramings (New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Rachel Sieder Line Schjolden Alan Angell

Copyright information

© 2005 Rachel Sieder, Line Schjolden, and Alan Angell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sikkink, K. (2005). The Transnational Dimension of the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. In: Sieder, R., Schjolden, L., Angell, A. (eds) The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10887-6_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics