American Academe in the Early Twentieth Century

  • Christopher J. Lucas


Reflecting back upon American higher education as he had experienced it in the early years of the 1900s, Henry Seidel Canby (Alma Mater, 1936) recalled it as a period of relative calm and tranquility underlain by a certain ambiguity of purpose. “Particularly in the first decade of the new century,” he reported, “they were trying in our college to combine various incompatibles. … A young instructor on the faculty in, say 1905, could look upon this unheard of combination of sporting resort, beer garden, political convention, laboratory, and factory for research with a mind as confused as a Spanish omelet.”1 But Canby’s sense of incompatibility seems not to have been widely shared, judging from the tone of the many writings on higher learning that appeared in scholarly and popular journals of the day. As compared with the deep divisions of opinion and sharply contrasting views vented in books and journals in the 1870s and 1880s, the overall climate was more nearly one of consensus and accommodation.2


Teacher Preparation Academic Freedom Black Student High Learning Normal School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Henry Seidel Canby, Alma Maten The Gothic Age of the American College (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1936), pp. 81–82.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    To speak of an “overall climate” is something of an historiographical fiction, but the general theme is amplified to good advantage in Laurence R. Veysey, The Emergence of the American University (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965), pp. 342ff.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    For an illustrative retrospective view by a major participant-observer, refer to Daniel Coit Gilman, “The Launching of a University” in Scribner’s Magazine 31 (March 1902): 327–331, later expanded into a book of the same title. Portions of the 1906 revised text appear as “Daniel Coit Gilman Reviews the Accomplishments of the University Era, 1869–1902,” in Richard Hofstadter and Wilson Smith, eds., American Higher Education, A Documentary History, 2 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961), II, pp. 595–601.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    J. R. Wheeler, “The Idea of a College and of a University,” Columbia University Quarterly 10 (December 1907): 12.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    On the contrast between the “old-time college” and the modern university, see Walter P. Metzger, Academic Freedom in the Age of the University (New York: Columbia University Press, 1955), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Relevant commentary includes Frank Thilly, “What Is a University?” Educational Review 22 (December 1901): 500Google Scholar
  7. R. M. Wenley, “The Classics and the Elective System,” School Review 18 (October 1910): 518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Webster Cook, “Evolution and Education,” Education 9 (February 1889): 372Google Scholar
  9. Robert MacDougall, “University Training and the Doctoral Degree,” Education 24 (January 1904): 261–276Google Scholar
  10. A. Lawrence Lowell, At War with Academic Traditions in America (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1934), pp.5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Russell Thomas, The Search for a Common Learning: General Education, 1800–1960 (New York: McGraw Hilt, 1962), pp. 24–25Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    J. P. Gordy, The Rise of the Normal-School Idea in the United States (Washington, D.C.: United States Bureau of Education, 1891)Google Scholar
  13. Wesley E. Armstrong, “Teacher Education, 1839–1953,” Higher Education 10 (April 1954): 123–131Google Scholar
  14. William F. Russell, “A Century of Teacher Education,” Teachers College Record 4 (March 1940): 481–492Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thorstein Veblen, The Higher Learning in America (New York: B.W. Huebsch, 1918)Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Veysey, pp. 305–312ff. See also Frank P. Graves, “The Need of Training for the College Presidency,” Forum 32 (February 1902): 680–685.Google Scholar
  17. 22.
    G. M. Stratton, “Externalism in American Universities,” Atlantic Monthly 100 (October 1907): 518.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    The potential implications are discussed in Richard Hof stadter and Walter P. Metzger, The Development of Academic Freedom in the United States (New York: Columbia University Press, 1955), pp. 453–454.Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    The theme is developed at some length in Merle Curti, Philanthropy in the Shaping of American Higher Education (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    Claude M. Fuess, The College Board: Its First Fifty Years (New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1950), pp. 9–25.Google Scholar
  21. 35.
    John J. Chapman, “The Harvard Classics and Harvard,” Science 30 (October 1, 1909): 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 36.
    John Dewey, “Academic Freedom,” Educational Review 23 (January 1902); 11.Google Scholar
  23. 37.
    The point is discussed in Veysey, pp. 346–347. See Thorstein Veblen, The Higher Learning in America (New York: B.W. Huebsch, 1918)Google Scholar
  24. 47.
    Thomas Elmer Will, “A Menace to Freedom,” Arena 26 (September 1901): 244–257.Google Scholar
  25. 48.
    Edward A. Ross, SeventyYears of It (Engiewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1936), pp. 94ff.Google Scholar
  26. 49.
    Orrin Leslie Elliott, Stanford University: The FirstTwenty-fiveYears (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1937), pp. 326–378.Google Scholar
  27. 50.
    Stephen B. L. Penrose, “The Organization of a Standard College,” Educational Review 44 (September 1912): 119.Google Scholar
  28. 67.
    Randolph S. Bourne, “The College: An Undergraduate View.” Atlantic Monthly 58 (October 1911): 668.Google Scholar
  29. 69.
    See I. GWyllire, “The Businessman Looks at the Higher Learning,” Journal of Higher Education 23 (June 1952): 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 70.
    Calvin Thomas, “The New Program of Studies at Columbia College,” Educational Review 29 (April 1905): 335.Google Scholar
  31. 72.
    Eugene Babbitt, “College Words and Phrases,” Dialect Notes 2 (1900): 3–70.Google Scholar
  32. 73.
    Edwin E. Slosson, Great American Universities (New York: Macmillan, 1910), pp. 75–77.Google Scholar
  33. 75.
    Woodrow Wilson, “What Is a College for?” Scriber’s Magazine 46 (October 1909): 574.Google Scholar
  34. 77.
    Randolph Bourne, “The College,” Atlantic Monthly 58 (October 1911): 669.Google Scholar
  35. 78.
    Upton Sinclair, The Goose-step, A Study of American Education (New York: Albert and Charles Boni, 1936), pp. 90–91Google Scholar
  36. 80.
    Richard G. Axt, The Federal Government and Financing Higher Education (New York: Columbia University Press, 1952), pp. 79–81.Google Scholar
  37. 81.
    See Maxine Davis, The Lost Generation (New York: Macmillan, 1936)Google Scholar
  38. Howard Bell, Youth Tell Their Story (Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1938)Google Scholar
  39. 93.
    Mabel Newcomer, A Century of Higher Education for American Women (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1959), p. 46.Google Scholar
  40. 109.
    See Mowat G. Fraser, The College of the Future (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937)Google Scholar
  41. Woodrow Wilson, “The Preceptorial System at Princeton,” Educational Review 39 (April 1910): 385–390.Google Scholar
  42. 115.
    John Dewey, The Educational Situation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1902), pp. 85–36.Google Scholar
  43. 120.
    See Frank Aydelotte, Breaking the Academic Lock Step:The Development of Honors Work in American Colleges and Universities (New York: Harper and Row, 1944)Google Scholar
  44. Burton R. Clark, The Distinctive College (Chicago: Aldine, 1970)Google Scholar
  45. 139.
    See Elbert K. Fretwell, Founding Public Junior Colleges (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1954)Google Scholar
  46. Leland L. Medsker and Dale Tillery, Breaking The Access Barriers (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971),pp. 18ff.Google Scholar
  47. 140.
    A. Monroe Stowe, Modernizing the College (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1926), pp. 55–56.Google Scholar
  48. 149.
    Willard S. Elsbree, The American Teacher, Evolution of a Prof ession in a Democracy (New York: American Book Company, 1939), p. 331.Google Scholar
  49. 150.
    W. F. Sutton, “The Organization of the Department of Education in Relation to Other Departments in Colleges and Universities,” Journal of Pedagogy 19 (December 1906–March 1907): 81–130.Google Scholar
  50. 151.
    Jurgen Herbst, And Sadly Teach: Teacher Education and Professionalization in American Culture (Madison,Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), pp. 161Google Scholar
  51. 153.
    James Donaldson, “The Science of Education,” American Journal of Education 26 (1876): 485–487.Google Scholar
  52. 156.
    Thomas J. Morgan, What Is the True Function of a Normal School? (Boston: Willard Small, 1886), p. 14.Google Scholar
  53. 157.
    F.A. P. Barnard, Annual Report of the President of Columbia College, Made to the Board of Trustees, June 6, 1881 (New York: Columbia College, 1881), p. 55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Christopher J. Lucas 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher J. Lucas

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations