Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Queenship and Power ((QAP))

  • 177 Accesses

Abstract

Othello and The Tempest seem unlikely plays to illustrate queenship. They revolve around strong males tyrannizing over females—a wife and a daughter—who display few of the authoritative qualities of Shakespeare’s model woman ruler, Elizabeth I. However, the plays do present ways of thinking about female authority that were new, even revolutionary, for an early modern English audience. References in each play to sightings of difierently formed humans—men whose heads stand below their shoulders—allow for rethinking the human body as a model for political and marital hierarchies. When these references are analyzed in conjunction with the plays’ politics, Othello and The Tempest suggest that, despite early modern beliefs about the unnaturalness of woman rulers, queenship could arise organically in the known world. This suggestion is surprising in light of the plays’ bold exhibitions of male power. More significant is the radical political perspective that the differently formed body implies, given that constructions of early modern authority rest on the idea that a human head is and will always be above and thus superior to the human body.1 This essay will examine early modern marital and political theorists’ manipulation of the body metaphor as a way of legitimizing exclusive male rulership and proceed with an analysis of the plays, ultimately demonstrating Shakespeare’s subtle undermining of early modern political and social orthodoxy.

Sir John Mandeville, Travels (1574) By permission of the Houghton Library, Harvard University.

As for the head of the naturall body, the head hath the power of directing all the members of the body to that use which the judgement in the head thinkes most convenient. It may apply sharpe cures, or cut off corrupt members, let blood in what proportion it thinkes fit, and as the body may spare, but yet is all this power ordained by God.

(King James, A Speech to the Lords and Commons of the Parliament at Whitehall, 1609)

Paul, Ephesians 5 sayeth this: ye wyves, submit yourselves unto your husbands, as unto the lorde, For the husband is the wyves heads, like as Christ also is the head of the congregation,… so let the wives also be in subjection to theyr husbands in all thynges.

(Heinrich Bullinger, The Christen state of matrimonye, 1543)

It was my hint to speak—such was my process—

And of the Cannibals that each [other] eat,

The Anthropophagi, and men whose heads

Do grow beneath their shoulders.

(Othello, 1.3.142–44)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Anne Somerset, Elizabeth I (New York: Knopf, 1991), p. 122.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Carole Levin, The Heart and Stomach of a King: Elizabeth I and the Politics of Sex and Power (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994), p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Leah Marcus, “Erasing the Stigma of Daughterhood: Mary I, Elizabeth I, and Henry VIII,” Daughters and Fathers, ed. Lynda E. Boose and Betty S. Flowers (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a thorough examination of the relationship between marital governance and political governance, see Constance Jordan, “The Household and the State: Transformations in the Representation of an Analogy from Aristotle to James I,” Modern Language Quarterly, 54 (1993), pp. 307–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. For an insightful discussion of Desdemona and Othello’s relationship and this moment in particular, see Irene G. Dash, Wooing, Wedding, and Power: Women in Shakespeare’s Plays (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981), p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony Gerard Barthelemy, Black Face, Maligned Race (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1987), p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dash, p. 123. For more on the prevailing of female authority at the end of Othello, see Emily C. Bartels, “Strategies of Submission: Desdemona, the Duchess, and the Assertion of Desire,” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 36:2 (1996), pp. 429–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See Lorie Jerrell Leininger, “The Miranda Trap: Sexism and Racism in Shakespeare’s Tempest,” The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, ed. Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz, Gayle Greene, and Carol Thomas Neely (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1983), especially pp. 285–87. As David Scott Kastan points out, Princess Elizabeth’s marriage more logically parallels that of Claribel to the Prince of Tunis. See Shakespeare After Theory (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 190.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Constance Jordan, Shakespeare’s Monarchies: Ruler and Subject in the Romances (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1997), p. 168.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deborah Willis, “Shakespeare’s Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism,” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 29:2 (1989), p. 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Carole Levin Jo Eldridge Carney Debra Barrett-Graves

Copyright information

© 2003 Carole Levin, Jo Eldridge Carney, Debra Barrett-Graves

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ray, S. (2003). “No head eminent above the rest”: Female Authority in Othello and The Tempest. In: Levin, C., Carney, J.E., Barrett-Graves, D. (eds) “High and Mighty Queens” of Early Modern England: Realities and Representations. Queenship and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10676-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10676-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-230-62118-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-10676-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics